J.-S. Jiang et al.
PhytochemistryLetters26(2018)88–92
compound 2 was determined by HR-ESI–MS at m/z 429.2058 [M+H]+
(calcd 429.2125).
which was determined by HR-ESI–MS at m/z 415.2312 [M+H]+ (calcd
415.2332).
The 1H NMR spectrum (Table 1) showed a single olefinic hydrogen
signal at δH 6.46, an anomeric proton signal at δH 4.28, three methyl
protons at δH 1.13 (6H), and 0.74 (3H), and a series of aliphatic hy-
drogen signals at δH 1.00–2.50. The 13C NMR spectrum showed 21
carbon signals (Table 1). Except for β-D-pyranoglucose carbon signals at
δC 96.9, 73.6, 77.1, 70.4, 76.4, and 61.3, the remaining 15 carbon
signals were confirmed as a sesquiterpene skeleton. Additionally, two
olefinic carbon signals at δH 130.7 and 147.2, two conjugated carbonyl
carbon signals at δC 167.9 and 201.2 in the 13C NMR and a series of
aliphatic hydrogen signals at δH 1.00–2.50 in the 1H NMR, were ob-
served. Combining with unsaturation, sesquiterpene groups were con-
cluded to be an α,β-unsaturated ketone fragment sesquiterpene with a
bicyclic structure. Furthermore, the NMR data of bicyclic sesquiterpene
were similar to aglycone of 3-hydroxylisopterocarpolone-3-O-β-D- glu-
(H-3). The relations of H-3/COOH (δC 167.9) in HMBC confirmed that
the C-4 position linked with a carboxy group instead of methyl group.
Therefore, bicyclic sesquiterpene was concluded to be eudesmane with
a carboxy group. Additionally, β-D-pyranoglucose was confirmed to be
located at C-11 by the relation of H-1′/C-11 in HMBC. Thus, the planar
structure of 2 was identified as 14-carboxylisopterocarpolone-11-O-β-D-
glucopyranoside.
The 1H and 13C NMR data showed that compound 4 (Table 1)
possessed four methyl protons at δH 1.14, 1.15, 1.16, and 1.59, an
anomeric proton signal at δH 4.32, β-D-pyranoglucose carbon signals at
δC 97.0, 73.8, 77.2, 70.4, 76.4, and 61.3, and a carbonyl group at δC
208.0. Compound 4 also has an α,β-unsaturated ketone sesquiterpene
aglycone according to the above data. Compared with eudesmane ses-
quiterpene of compound 3, the chemical shifts of α,β-unsaturated ke-
tone in 4 moved to the low field. Thus, the α,β-unsaturated ketone was
preliminarily deduced to be located in the structure of cyclopentane,
rather than cyclohexane. According to the reported results, the data of
the sesquiterpene moiety of compound 4 were in agree with those of
quiterpene structure of compound 4 was confirmed to be a guaiane
sesquiterpene. In addition, OH and glucose were located at C-7 and C-
11 by the correlation signals OH/C-1 and C-9, H-1′/C-11 in the HMBC
spectrum, respectively. Thus, the planar structure of 4 was identified as
10,11-dihydroxy-4-guaien-3-one 11-O-β-D-glucopyranoside.
Similarly, the stereochemistry of 4 was elucidated on its ROESY and
ECD spectra data (Figs. 2 and 3). In the ROESY spectrum, the relations
of H-1/H-7 and H-15, H-7/H-15 suggested that the relative configura-
tions of C-1, C-7 and C-10 were consistent with that of (1S,7R,10R)-
11,15-dihydroxy-4-guaien-3-one 11-O-β-D-glucopyranoside (Xu et al.,
2017). At the same time, compound 4 exhibited similar Cotton effects
in the range of 200 ∼ 400 nm in the ECD spectra, indicating that their
absolute configurations were consistent. Thus, the absolute stereo-
chemistry at the C-1, 7, 10 positions in 4 were shown to be 1R,7R,10S.
Finally, compound 4 was identified and named (1R,7R,10S)-10,11-di-
hydroxy-4-guaien-3-one 11-O-β-D-glucopyranoside.
The stereochemistry of 2 was determined by the same method as
compound 1. Furthermore, 2 displayed a similar negative Cotton effect
at
348 nm
(Δε = −1.03)
with
(5R,7R,10S)-3-hydro-
plaining the same absolute configurations of C-5, C-7 and C-10 in the
ECD spectrum. Consequently, the absolute stereochemistry of 2 was
shown to be 5R,7R,10S. Thus, compound 2 was defined as (5R,7R,10S)-
14-carboxylisopterocarpolone-11-O-β-D-glucopyranoside.
Sesquiterpenes were the main ingredients isolated from A. lanceae,
which primarily existed as types of eudesmane, guaiane and spir-
ovetivane. Compounds 1–3 were eudesmane-type, and 4 was guaiane-
type, as determined by detailed spectroscopic means (NMR, and MS
et al.). The compounds’ absolute configurations were determined by
using experimental ROESY and ECD spectra, as well as chemical
methods. The findings of these compounds add to the diversity of these
ingredients. The bioactive assays showed that compounds 1–4 ex-
hibited weak α-glycosidase enzyme inhibition activities and weak
PTP1 B inhibition activities.
Compound 3 was obtained as a white powder, [α]2D0 +42.1° (c 0.15,
MeOH). The IR spectrum of 3 showed the presence of hydroxyl groups
(3380 cm−1), carbonyl groups (1651 cm−1), and an olefinic bond
(1604 cm−1). The molecular formula was determined to be C21H34O8
(Ω = 6) based on the m/z 415.2311 [M+H]+ in HR-ESI–MS.
Analysis of the 1H and 13C NMR data (Table 1) indicated the pre-
sence of four methyl groups, a carbonyl group, an olefinic bond, and β-
D-pyranoglucose. These groups were similar to those of compounds 1
and 2. The aglycone of 3 was concluded preliminarily to be eudesmane
sesquiterpene and showed an oxymethine (H-1) at δC 72.7 in 13C NMR.
The oxymethine confirmed that the hydroxyl was linked with C-1 by the
correlations of H-15/C-1, and H-2/C-1 in the HMBC spectrum. In ad-
dition, the correlations of H-15/C]C (C-5, δC 163.0) and H-2/C]C (C-
4, δC 127.9) confirmed that the double bond was located at the C-4 and
C-5 positions, and the carbonyl group was assigned to C-3 position by
the correlations of H-2 and H-14/C-3 in the HMBC spectrum. According
to the above conclusions, eudesmane sesquiterpene of 3 was 1-hydroxy-
3-carbonyl-Δ-4,5-eudesmane. Additionally, β-D-pyranoglucose was
confirmed to be located at C-11 by the relation of H-1′/C-11 in HMBC.
Thus, the planar structure of 3 was identified as 1-hydroxylcarissone-
11-O-β-D-glucopyranoside.
3. Materials and methods
3.1. Generals
The specific rotations, UV, and ECD data were individually mea-
sured on JASCO P-2000, JASCO V-650, and JASCO J-815 spectrometers
(JASCO, Easton, MD, U.S.A.). IR spectra were collected by a Nicolet
5700 instrument (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, U.S.A.). NMR
spectra were run on a Bruker 500 Hz spectrometer (Bruker-Biospin,
Billerica, MA, U.S.A.), and chemical shifts were given in δ (ppm) with
DMSO-d6 peaks as the reference. HRESIMS data were collected using an
Agilent 1100 series LC/MSD ESI/TOF instrument (Agilent
Technologies, Waldbronn, Germany). GC analyses were performed on
an Agilent 7890A system. Reversed-phase preparative HPLC (P-HPLC)
was run on a Shimadzu LC-10AT system quipped with an SPD-10A
detector (Shimadzu, Japan). An Agilent 1260 series system equipped
with an Apollo C18 column (250 × 4.6 mm, 5 μm, Grace Davison) was
used for HPLC analyses.
Furthermore, the stereochemistry of 3 was also confirmed by its
ROESY and ECD spectra data (Figs. 2 and 3). In the ROESY spectrum,
the relations of H-7/H-6a, H-15/OH-1 and H-15/H-6b suggested that H-
1 and H-7 were on the same side of the eudesmane ring plane. In the
ECD spectrum, compound 3 exhibited an identical negative Cotton ef-
the absolute stereochemistry of 3 was determined to be 1R,7R,10R.
Finally, compound
3 was identified as depicted and named
3.2. Plant material
(1R,7R,10R)-1-hydroxylcarissone-11- O-β-D-glucopyranoside.
Compound 4 was also obtained as a white powder, [α]2D0 −61.2° (c
0.08, MeOH). The IR of 4 showed the presence of hydroxyl groups
(3394 cm−1), carbonyl groups (1680 cm−1), and an olefinic bond
(1630 cm−1). Compound 4 possessed a molecular formula of C21H34O8,
The rhizomes of A. lancea were collected at Huanggang City (Hubei
Province, China) in June 2014 and were identified by Prof. Lin Ma. A
voucher specimen (ID-s-2596) was deposited in the herbarium at the
Department of Medicinal Plants, Institute of Materia Medica, Chinese
91