yellow-I = lucifer yellow iodoacetamide (MP#L1338); SR-B =
sulforhodamine-B (Aldrich#23,016-2); SR-101 = sulforhoda-
mine-101 (Aldrich#28,491-2); MPTS = methoxypyrenetrisul-
fitting the data with eqn. (1). Apparent glucose binding constants
were calculated by fitting the data with eqn. (4):
F
calc = (Fmin + FmaxK[glucose])/(1 + K[glucose])
(4)
fonate (MP#335); CTR
=
carboxytetramethylrhodamine
tetrakis(4-sulfophenyl)porphine
(
(
(
MP#C300);
MP#T6932); TCPP
MP#T6931). The preparation of HPTS(Lys)
TSPP
=
where Fcalc is the calculated fluorescence intensity, Fmin is the
initial fluorescence intensity of the quenched dye, Fmax is the
calculated intensity at which the fluorescence increase reaches
=
tetrakis(4-carboxyphenyl)porphine
has already been
3
9
described. Perylenetetracarboxylic acid (PTCA) was prepared
by simple alkaline hydrolysis of perylene dianhydride with
potassium hydroxide and used as the tetrapotassium carboxylate
salt. Details for the preparation and characterization of m-
BBVBP are given in the supporting information.‡ All other
reagents including HPTS dye were purchased from Aldrich Co.
and used as received. All solvents were HPLC grade. DMF was
27
its maximum and K is the apparent binding constant.
Quencher : dye ratio optimization for glucose sensing
4
+
The fluorescence measurements were done in situ by taking the
emission spectra of a 1 : 1 quencher : dye solution then adding
an aliquot of buffered 1 M glucose solution and measuring the
new fluorescence emission after shaking for 60 s. Additional
aliquots were added and measurements taken until a glucose
concentration of 30 mM was obtained. The overall process
was then repeated at successively higher ratios until an optimal
quencher : dye ratio could be determined.
stirred over CaH for 2 days and filtered immediately before
2
use. All reactions were conducted under an inert atmosphere of
argon using air sensitive techniques. Measurements of pH were
1
1
carried out on a Mettler Toledo MP 220 pH meter. B NMR
spectra were measured on a Bruker 250 using BF :Et O as an
3
2
1
3
1
external standard. C and H NMR spectra were measured on
a Varian 500 referenced to TMS.
Glucose sensing
The fluorescence measurements for each dye were done in situ
by taking the fluorescence emission spectra of the quencher :
dye solution at its optimized ratio. An aliquot of buffered 1 M
glucose solution was then added and the new fluorescence
emission was measured after shaking for 60 s. Additional
aliquots were added and measurements taken until a glucose
concentration of 30 mM was obtained. Representative spectra
are provided in supporting information.‡
Fluorescence emission and UV-vis absorption studies
All studies were carried out in pH 7.4 buffer solution prepared
with water purified via a Nanopure Ultrafiltration system.
Buffer solution (pH 7.4, 0.1 ionic strength) was freshly prepared
using KH
2
PO
4
and Na
2
HPO . Fluorescence spectra were taken
4
on a Perkin-Elmer LS50-B luminescence spectrometer. The
absorption spectra were taken on a Hewlett Packard 8452A
Diode Array Spectrophotometer. All studies were carried out
◦
at 20 C without exclusion of air. Excitation and emission
Acknowledgements
wavelengths for each dye are given in Fig. 1. For fluorescence
titration experiments, the added volume did not exceed 3% of
the total volume and the sample absorbance for fluorescent
We thank Glumetrics, Inc., operating through the BioStar
Industry–University Cooperative Research program, for con-
tinuing financial support.
24
measurements was below 0.1. All experiments except the
quencher : dye optimization studies were carried out in triplicate
and the error is reported as the standard deviation. All data was
analyzed using the Solver (non-linear least-squares curve fitting)
25
References
in Microsoft Excel.
1
2
3
H. Fang, G. Kaur and B. H. Wang, J. Fluoresc., 2004, 14, 481.
R. J. McNichols and G. L. Cote, J. Biomed. Opt., 2000, 5, 5.
J. R. Chen, Y. Q. Miao, N. Y. He, X. H. Wu and S. J. Li, Biotechnol.
Adv., 2004, 22, 505.
Absorbance studies to show complex formation
Measurements were done in situ by taking the absorbance
spectra of the dyes HPTS, HPTS(Lys)
3
, PTCA, MPTS and
4 H. S. Cao and M. D. Heagy, J. Fluoresc., 2004, 14, 569.
5
T. D. James and S. Shinkai, Topics in Current Chemistry, ed.
S. Penad e´ s, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2002, vol. 218.
J. P. Lorand and J. O. Edwards, J. Org. Chem., 1959, 24, 769.
J. N. Camara, J. T. Suri, F. E. Cappuccio, R. A. Wessling and B.
Singaram, Tetrahedron Lett., 2002, 43, 1139.
fluorescein-SA at a series of quencher concentrations. The
−
5
emission of each dye (2 mL of 1 × 10 M in buffer, TCPP
6
7
−
6
and TSPP at 4 × 10 M) was first obtained, then aliquots of
quencher (0.005, 0.05, 0.01 or 0.1 M) were added, the solution
shaken for 60 s and the new absorbance was measured. In order
to minimize the volume of quencher solution being added, more
highly concentrated quencher stock solutions were used for
the titrations of dyes requiring high quencher concentrations
to achieve significant perturbation in their absorbance spectra.
Association constants (KUV) were calculated by means of
Benesi–Hildebrand plots and eqn. (2):
8 J. T. Suri, D. B. Cordes, F. E. Cappuccio, R. A. Wessling and B.
Singaram, Langmuir, 2003, 19, 5145.
J. T. Suri, D. B. Cordes, F. E. Cappuccio, R. A. Wessling and B.
Singaram, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2003, 42, 5857.
9
1
1
1
1
1
0 F. E. Cappuccio, J. T. Suri, D. B. Cordes, R. A. Wessling and B.
Singaram, J. Fluoresc., 2004, 14, 521.
1 E. B. de Borba, C. L. C. Amaral, M. J. Politi, R. Villalobos and M. S.
Baptista, Langmuir, 2000, 16, 5900.
2 K. Nakashima and N. Kido, Photochem. Photobiol., 1996, 64,
b/(DA) = 1/(S
with association constants determined using eqn. (3):
UV = (y-intercept)/(slope) = −(x-intercept)
t
K
UV D∈[L]) + 1/(S
t
D∈)
(2)
2
96.
3 Z. G. Zhao, T. Shen and H. J. Xu, J. Photochem. Photobiol., A, 1990,
5
2, 47.
4 B. S. Gaylord, S. J. Wang, A. J. Heeger and G. C. Bazan, J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 2001, 123, 6417.
15 D. L. Wang, X. Gong, P. S. Heeger, F. Rininsland, G. C. Bazan and
K
(3)
where b is the y-intercept, DA is the change in absorbance at the
monitored wavelength, S is the substrate (dye) concentration,
D∈ is the change in the molar absorptivity and [L] is the ligand
quencher) concentration. Absorbance spectra and plots are
A. J. Heeger, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 2002, 99, 49.
t
1
6 L. H. Chen, D. W. McBranch, H. L. Wang, R. Helgeson, F.
26
Wudl and D. G. Whitten, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 1999, 96,
(
1
2287.
provided as supporting information.‡
1
7 N. DiCesare, M. R. Pinto, K. S. Schanze and J. R. Lakowicz,
Langmuir, 2002, 18, 7785.
ꢀ
ꢀ
Fluorescence emission studies
18 4,4 -N,N -Bis-[benzyl-(3-methylene-pyridinium bromide)-5-(boronic
acid)]-dipyridinium dibromide.
19 J. R. Lakowicz, Principles of Fluorescence Spectroscopy, Kluwer
Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York, 1999, 2nd edn.
Fluorescence intensity was taken as the area under the emission
curve for all studies. Stern–Volmer constants were calculated by
1
7 1 2
O r g . B i o m o l . C h e m . , 2 0 0 5 , 3 , 1 7 0 8 – 1 7 1 3