A R T I C L E S
Wakahara et al.
Arenas and co-workers6 made a theoretical study on the
photoexcited 3H-diazirine and came to the following conclusion.
By means of dynamical calculations, they demonstrated that
carbene formation does not take place in the excited state and
it is formed on the ground-state surface after decaying through
a conical intersection.
141.06 (s), 140.04 (s), 138.99 (s), 138.50 (s), 138.09 (s), 137.27 (s),
136.24 (s), 134.67 (s), 134.52 (s), 75.90 (s), 67.56 (s), 39.35 (d), 17.76
(q). UV-vis (λmax, toluene): 339 nm. FABMS (toluene/NBA): m/z
1
810 (M), 720 (C60). Minor isomer, H NMR (500 MHz, CS2/CDCl3):
δ 2.20 (sept, 1H, J ) 6.4 Hz), 1.12 (d, 6H, J ) 6.4 Hz). 13C NMR
(CS2/CDCl3 ) 3/1, 125 MHz): δ 146.98 (s), 144.89 (s), 144.35 (s),
144.32 (s), 144.00 (s), 143.65 (s), 143.59 (s), 143.48 (s), 143.16 (s),
143.01 (s), 142.93 (s), 142.41 (s), 142.22 (s), 142.09 (s), 141.71 (s),
141.12 (s), 141.51 (s), 140.16 (s), 139.07 (s), 138.25 (s), 137.32 (s),
136.58 (s), 136.29 (s), 135.01 (s), 84.59 (s), 59.28 (s), 32.54 (d), 17.51
(q) (seven peaks of minor isomer might be overlapped by some of the
major isomer’s peaks). UV-vis (λmax, toluene): 339 nm. FABMS
(toluene/NBA): m/z 810 (M), 720 (C60).
Recently, we reported the use of C60 as a probe to distinguish
carbene/diazo partition in the photolysis of adamantanediazirine.7
C60 reacts with diazomethane to yield fulleroid. By adding onto
C60, carbene affords methanofullerene. We now wish to report
the photolysis of two diazirines in the presence of C60 with the
object of determining the contribution of various pathways in
the decomposition of alkylchlorodiazirine.
Photochemical Reaction of 3-Chloro-3-chloromethyldiazirine
with C60. We photoirradiated a toluene/o-dichlorobenzene (1:3) solution
of 3-chloromethyl-3-chlorodiazirine (8.0 mg, 3.4 × 10-3 M) and C60
(24 mg, 7.0 × 10-3 M) with a high-pressure mercury-arc lamp for 3 h
at -40 °C in a NMR tube. 1H NMR measurement of the reaction
mixture showed the yield of 1,2-dichloroethylene (E- and Z-) and
C60C(Cl)CH2Cl to be 45 and 25%, respectively. The ratio of the (E)-
and (Z)-1,2-dichloroethylene was 28/72 (E/Z ) 0.38). We also carried
out a preparative-scale experiment using diazirine 7 (44.4 mg, 8.0 ×
10-2 M) and C60 (144 mg, 2.0 × 10-2 M) to obtain an authentic sample
of the isomeric C60C(Cl)CH2Cl adduct (8). We isolated adduct 8 (7.4
mg) by HPLC separation with a Buckyprep column. Compound 8, 1H
NMR (300 MHz, CS2/C6D6): 4.68 (s, 2H). 13C NMR (125 MHz, CS2/
C6D6): 145.19 (s), 145.15 (s), 145.11 (s), 145.06 (s), 145.00 (s), 144.79
(s), 144.75 (s), 144.70 (s), 143.54 (s), 144.47 (s), 144.36 (s), 144.29
(s), 144.05 (s), 143.58 (s), 143.28 (s), 143.10 (s), 143.00 (s), 142.87
(s), 142.78 (s), 142.19 (s), 142.11 (s), 142.03 (s), 141.68 (s), 141.24
(s), 140.96 (s), 139.14 (s), 137.12 (s), 78.27 (s), 56.69 (s), 46.80 (t).
UV-vis (λmax, toluene): 328, 429, 485 nm. FABMS (toluene/NBA):
m/z 816 (M), 720 (C60).
Experimental Section
Gel permeation chromatographic separation was performed on a
recycling preparative HPLC with a series of Jaigel 1H and 2H columns
(Japan Analytical Industry Co., Ltd.) using toluene as an eluent. The
isolation of isomers was performed by using a preparative HPLC system
with a Buckyprep column (Nacalai Tesque: 20 mm φ × 250 mm)
with toluene as an eluent. The ratio of isomers was determined by HPLC
analysis using an analytical Buckyprep column (Nacalai Tesque: 4.6
mm φ × 250 mm) with toluene as an eluent. The yields of 1-chloro-
2-methyl-1-propene, 1,2-dichloroethylene, and C60CClCH2Cl were
determined by 1H NMR measurement of the reaction mixture. Bibenzyl
was used as an internal standard. The yield of C60CCl(i-Pr) was
determined by HPLC analysis. Isopropylchlorodiazirine and chlorom-
ethylchlorodiazirine were synthesized by a previously reported proce-
dure.8
Photochemical Reaction of 3-Chloro-3-isopropyldiazirine with
C60. We photoirradiated a toluene/o-dichlorobenzene (1:3) solution of
isopropylchlorodiazirine 1 (8.0 mg, 3.4 × 10-2 M) and C60 (48 mg,
3.4 × 10-2 M) with a high-pressure mercury-arc lamp for 30 min at
-40 °C in a sealed Pyrex NMR tube. The reaction mixture was allowed
to stand for 3 h in the dark at room temperature to complete N2
elimination. 1H NMR measurement of the reaction mixture showed the
yield of 1-chloro-2-methyl-1-propene to be 82%. The HPLC analysis,
using a Buckyprep column, demonstrated that adduct 5 was obtained
in 18% yield, respectively. The HPLC analysis also showed the ratio
of 5a and 5b as 28/72. We also carried out a preparative-scale
experiment using diazirine 1 (137 mg, 3.8 × 10-2 M) and C60 (72 mg,
3.3 × 10-3 M) to obtain an authentic sample of the isomeric C60CCl-
(i-Pr) adduct (5). We isolated adduct 5 (21 mg) by first-stage HPLC
separation with a GPC column and isomers 5a (6 mg) and 5b (15 mg)
by second-stage HPLC separation with a Buckyprep column. Compound
Results and Discussion
The establishment of the role of the excited state in the
chemistry of diazirine has been studied by fluorescence spec-
troscopy, as demonstrated by Platz and co-workers.9 Alkyl-
chlorodiazirines, which fluoresce weakly or not at all, have a
low fluorescence quantum yield which makes the study of
excited-state chemistry difficult. Another method entails the
analysis of the products obtained under photolysis and ther-
molysis in the presence of various amounts of a reactive olefin
at various temperatures, as performed for chloromethylchlo-
rodiazirine and n-propylchlorodiazirine.10 This method is tedious
and time-consuming. Yet a different method to study the excited
state of diazirine is the time-resolved photoacoustic calorimetry,
which monitors the amplitude and time evolution of heat
depositions following photoexcitation.10,11
Investigators now recognize that, when diazirines are used
as the source of carbenes, several processes contribute to the
formation of the final product including the rearrangement of
the excited state of the diazirine. As well, the formation of the
metastable diazo intermediate competes with the production of
carbene. The efficiency of these three ways of decomposition
of the diazirine strongly depends on the structure of the diazirine
being used. No rules exist to predict the relative efficiency of
these different pathways. Considering all of the procedures
described earlier, we found that the C60 trapping methodology
presents a simple way to determine the efficiencies of these
1
5a, H NMR (300 MHz, CS2/CDCl3): δ 3.36 (sept, 1H, J ) 6.6 Hz),
1.66 (d, 6H, J ) 6.6 Hz). 13C NMR (75 MHz, CS2/CDCl3): δ 145.98
(s), 145.05 (s), 145.02 (s), 144.99 (s), 144.95 (s), 144.87 (s), 144.82
(s), 144.64 (s), 144.45 (s), 144.41 (s), 144.31 (s), 144.27 (s), 144.17
(s), 144.16 (s), 143.50 (s), 143.43 (s), 143.09 (s), 142.91 (s), 142.90
(s), 142.84 (s), 142.78 (s), 142.72 (s), 142.68 (s), 142.21 (s), 142.03
(s), 141.94 (s), 141.56 (s), 141.02 (s), 140.76 (s), 138.73 (s), 131.42
(s), 80.24 (s), 64.30 (s), 31.08 (d), 18.62 (q). UV-vis (λmax, toluene):
331, 430 nm. FABMS (toluene/NBA): m/z 810 (M), 720 (C60).
Compound 5b, major isomer, 1H NMR (CS2/CDCl3, 500 MHz): δ 5.02
(sept, 1H, J ) 6.4 Hz), 1.51 (d, 6H, J ) 6.4 Hz). 13C NMR (CS2/
CDCl3, 125 MHz): δ 147.24 (s), 147.75 (s), 144.53 (s), 143.77 (s),
143.72 (s), 143.71 (s), 143.59 (s), 143.51 (s), 143.38 (s), 143.20 (s),
143.04 (s), 143.02 (s), 142.99 (s), 142.77 (s), 142.70 (s), 142.46 (s),
142.29 (s), 142.24 (s), 141.79 (s), 141.69 (s), 141.37 (s), 141.28 (s),
(6) Arenas, J. F.; Toco`n, I. L.; Otero, J. C.; Soto, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002,
124, 1728.
(7) Akasaka, T.; Liu, M. T. H.; Niino, Y.; Maeda, Y.; Wakahara, T.; Okamura,
M.; Kabayashi, K.; Nagase, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 7134.
(8) Graham, W. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1965, 87, 4396.
(9) Modarelli, D.; Morgan, S.; Platz, M. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114, 7034.
(10) Bonneau, R.; Liu, M. T. H.; Kim, K. C.; Goodman, J. L. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1996, 118, 3829.
(11) LaVilla, J. A.; Goodman, J. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1989, 111, 712 and 6877.
9
9466 J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 124, NO. 32, 2002