3
Generally, N-methyl substituted thiazolidinones gave better
yields than the N-unsubstituted ones, as evidenced for
compounds 2f vs 2g (74 and 58% yield, respectively, see entries
6 and 7, Table 1). In this context, the reaction yields seem to be
favored when using thiazolidinones derived from aldehydes (R2 =
H), instead of those derived from ketones (R2 = Me), yields
ranging from 68 to 74%, see entries 4-6.
Electron donating or withdrawing groups (EDG and EWG
respectively) in the phenyl ring, did not affect the final yields. As
an example, strong EDG present in 2i displays the highest yield
(89%, see entry 9, Table 1), but the methyl derivative 2h, bearing
a medium EDG showed the lowest yield (25%, see entry 8, Table
1). A similar behavior is observed when using EWG.
To further evaluate the scope of WR as a reducing agent, we
prepared the α,β-unsaturated selenazolidinone 1k, and the
treatment with WR led to the reduced product 2k in 67% yield
(see entry 11, Table 1).
Scheme 3. Proposed mechanism for the selective reduction of
α,β-unsaturated thiazo and selenazolidinone compounds.
could explain the importance of the α,β-conjugated ester in the
selective reduction mechanism.
Benzylidenes 6a-b,13 were also selected as substrates; see
Scheme 2. The main difference in both substrates is the
α,β−conjugated group: a benzylidene (6) instead of an ester (2).
When we applied the protocol to 6a-b after 48 h at rt, or even at
reflux, the starting material was recovered and no reduced
product was formed, pointing out the needed of the ester as an
EWG to reduce the substrate.
A series of heterocycles α,β-unsaturated esters (1a-1k) were
selectively reduced to the corresponding saturated heterocycles
2a-2k, using WR and mild reaction conditions.
It seems that the reaction is not sensitive to the electronic
effects in the aromatic ring of the thiazolidinones. Therefore,
when using either electron-donating (-OMe, -Me) or electron-
withdrawing groups (-Br, -Cl), the desired reduction products
were obtained in good yields (Table 2, entries 1-10). Besides, the
position of the substituent groups did not considerably affect the
reactivity.
Looking for a plausible mechanism for the reduction we
explored in literature for antecedents. It is described the use of
NaSeH and LiSeH as selective reducing agents of α,β-
unsaturated carbonyl compounds.14 Recently, Alves and co-
workers reduced electron deficient olefins as chalcones using
PhSe-SePh.15 WR was also used as a chemoselective reductive
agent for diketones, reported by Jaisankar and co-workers.16
In this sense, a new applicability of Woollins’ reagent is
a selective reducing agent of thiazo or
described as
selenazolidinone olefins conjugated to esters.
Based on this background and our findings, we suggested a
possible mechanism for the selective reduction, as it is depicted
in Scheme 3.
Acknowledgments
It is reported that WR is in equilibrium with
a
diselenaphosphorane species, being the reactive one in solution.17
The conjugated addition of the Se atom to the α,β unsaturated
ester gives the intermediate I, that could undergo Se0 to form
compound 2 formation.
The CSIC-Grupos UdelaR supported this work. C.P. is
grateful to the Agencia Nacional de Investigación e Innovación
(ANII) for a fellowship (BE_POS_2010_1_2362). We thank Dr.
A. Rodríguez-Haralambides for HRMS.
References and notes
1. Woollins, J.D.; Hua, G. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 1368.
2. Bhattacharyya, P.; Woollins, J.D. Tetr. Lett. 2001, 42, 5949.
3. Hua, G.; Li, Y.; Slawin, A.M.Z.; Woollins, J.D. Org. Lett., 2006,
8,5251
O
O
NH
NH
O
O
H
O
O
S
S
R
WR
PhMe, rt
NH
X
4. Ostrowski, W.; Gierczyk, B.; Frański, R. J .Heterocycl. Chem.
2012, 49, 1266.
O
S
PhMe, reflux
6a-b
7a-b
5
5. Gray, I.P; Bhattacharyya, P.; Slawin, A.M.Z.; Woollins, J.D.
Chem. Eur. J. 2005, 11, 6221.
6a: R = OMe, 95%
6b: R = CF3, 91%
R
R
6. Hua, G.; Li, Y.; Slawin, A.M.Z.; Woollins, J.D. Dalton Trans.
2007, 15, 1477.
Scheme 2. Synthesis of thiazolidinones 6a-b and its attempt
7. (a) Liotta, D.; Monahan, R. Science. 1986, 231, 356; (b) Wirth, T.
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2000, 39, 3740; (c) Rhoden, C. R. B.; Zeni,
G. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2011, 9, 1301; (d) Levason, W.; Reid, G.;
Zhang, W. Dalton Trans. 2011, 40, 8491.
to reduction
According to the proposed mechanism for the selective α,β
reduction, a 1,4 Se attack of the diselenaphosphorane specie
would take place.
8. (a) Garían, J. Adv. Heterocycl. Chem. 1995, 62, 249; (b) Uemoto,
T. Adv. Heterocycl. Chem. 1995, 64, 323; (c) Swapna, K.; Murthy,
S. N.; Nageswar, Y. V. D. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2011, 10, 1940.
9. (a) Mugesh, G.; du Mont, W. W.; Sies, H. Chem. Rev. 2001, 101,
2125; (b) Nogueira, C. W.; Zeni, G.; Rocha, T. B. T. Chem. Rev.
2004, 104, 6255; (c) Ninomiya, M.; Garud, D R.; Koketsu, M.
Coord. Chem. Rev. 2011, 255, 2968.
Comparing both electron withdrawing groups (ester
compounds 1a-k, and p-trifluoromethyl phenyl moiety,
compound 6b), it is noticeable that the conjugation obtained
using an α,β ester gets a more activated 4 position, for the attack
of the Se, according to the mechanistic proposal. These results
10. Pizzo, C.; Faral-Tello, P.; Salinas, G.; Fló, M.; Robello, C.; Wipf,
P.; Mahler, S. G. Med. Chem. Commun. 2012, 3, 362.
11. Pizzo, C.; Faral-Tello, P.; Robello, C.; Mahler, G. Eur. J. Med.
Chem. 2016, 109, 107.