Z. Shi et al.
Molecular Catalysis 496 (2020) 111190
Fig. 1. (a) The coordination environment of Cu(I)–CN–BPY.
(A: 1-x, 1-y, 2-z; Color code: Cu1, teal spheres; Cu2, sky blue
spheres; C, gray spheres; N, blue spheres; all hydrogen atoms
are omitted for clarity). (b) The 1D chain-like of Cu(I)–
CN–BPY. (c) The connection scheme of two kinds of Cu(I) with
–CN bonds in the 2D layers of frame. (d) The 3D network frame
of Cu(I)–CN–BPY. (For interpretation of the references to
colour in the figure legend, the reader is referred to the web
version of this article.)
catalytic sites [42–48]. Cu(I)-based MOFs have efficient ability to
2.39; N, 16.73; Cu, 37.93; Found: C, 42.98; H, 2.41; N, 16.71; Cu, 37.90.
catalyze cycloaddition of CO2 with terminal alkynes to produce
α
-alkylidene cyclic carbonates under mild conditions, for example,
2.2. Catalysis
Zhao’s group reported an effective MOF catalyst with [Cu4I4] clusters to
catalyze the cyclization of propargylic alcohols with CO2 under mild
conditions, and the turnover number (TON) could reach up to 14400
[49].
Carboxylic cyclization of propargylic alcohols: before the catalysis
experiments, compound 1, 2 and 3 as catalysts were solvent exchanged
by CH3CN for three days, and dried in a vacuum at 100 ℃ to remove the
solvent molecules. The typical experiments were studied heteroge-
Inspired by the excellent work, we optimized the synthesis of a Cu
(I)–CN-based MOF, [Cu2(CN)2(BPY)] (Cu(I)–CN–BPY, compound 1), by
incorporating simple CuCl2, 4,4’-bipyridine (BPY) organic bridged
ligand and Na4W10O32 in mixable solvent of H2O and CH3CN under a
solvothermal reaction. In the process, CNꢀ was in situ obtained from the
neously with 20 μL TEA, 84 mg (1 mmol, about 100 μL) 2-methyl-3-
butyn-2-ol in 1 mL CH3CN as solvent, 0.05 mmol of Cu(I)–BPYs (about
15, 25 and 35 mg for Cu(I)–CN–BPY, Cu(I)–Cl–BPY and Cu(I)–I–BPY) in
autoclave with 0.5 MPa CO2 at appropriate temperatures and pre-
determined time. The pressure of CO2 was staid stable throughout re-
action. After the reaction, remains were purified by column
chromatography, and then performed by 1H NMR analysis for yield.
cleavage of the C–CN bond of acetonitrile by the synergistic effect Cu2+
4ꢀ
ions and W10
O
under hydrothermal reaction. Despite the structure of
32
Cu(I)–CN–BPY has been synthesised by Zhou and co-workers in 2011,
we improved the synthesis process of green cyanide source by replace-
ment K4Fe(CN)6⋅3H2O with acetonitrile [50].
3. Results and discussion
For seeking out the active sites of MOF structure in carboxylic
cyclization of propargylic alcohols, we also constructed two MOFs with
Cu-X (X = Cl, I) cluster, [Cu2Cl2(BPY)2] (Cu(I)–Cl–BPY, compound 2)
and [Cu2I2(BPY)2] (Cu(I)–I–BPY, compound 3), both of them have high
density of Cu(I) cores in their structure for this reaction and easily
synthesized by simple methods with low-cost materials [51]. Besides,
above three unique three-dimensional frameworks were synthesized by
4, 4’-bipyridine as the linker, thus all MOFs counld catalyze cyclization
of propargylic alcohols in heterogeneous manner. For convenience, we
called collectively of above three MOFs as Cu(I)–BPYs.
3.1. Structural description
Solvothermal reaction of Cu(NO3)2⋅3H2O, [(n-C4H9)N]4[W10O32
]
and 4, 4’-bipyridine gave compound 1 in a yield of 52.5 %. As we
known, polyoxometalates (POMs) are class of discrete anionic metal
oxide clusters, which commonly used as oxidation catalysts and pho-
4ꢀ
tocatalysts [52–54]. Especially, decatungstate anion W
O
10 32
has been
especially considered for its very important photocatalytic properties
[55,56]. In this synthesis process of synthesizing the Cu(I)–CN–BPY, we
4ꢀ
found the W
O
has an assistant function in prompting the cleavage of
2. Experimental
10 32
4ꢀ
C–C bonds of acetonitrile in the process. When in absence of W
(I)–CN–BPY cannot be obtained.
O
, Cu
10 32
2.1. Synthesis of Cu(I)–CN–BPY
Cu(I)–CN–BPY crystallizes in the monoclinic system with P2(1)/n
space group. The asymmetric Cu(I)–CN–BPY unit consists of two crys-
tallographically distinct copper ions, one BPY ligand and two –CN
bonds. The crystallographic data structure refinement for compounds 1,
2 and 3 are listed in Table S1. The relevant bond lengths and bond angles
are listed in Tables S2, S3 and S4. As shown in Fig. 1a, Cu1 ion is three-
coordinated in a slightly plane triangle environment, and the Cu1 center
is coordinated by one N(2) atom from the benzene ring of the BPY
ligand, two nitrogen atoms, N(3) and N(4), from the –CN bonds. Cu(2)
ion adopts tetrahedral coordination geometry with four nitrogen atoms,
one of the N(3) atoms from –CN bond is bound to the other Cu(1) center,
Cu(NO3)2⋅3H2O (60 mg, 0.25 mmol), [(n-C4H9)4N][W10O32] (50 mg,
0.019 mmol) and 4, 4’-bipyridine (24 mg, 0.15 mmol) were added in a
100 mL beaker and dissolved by 6.0 mL mixed solution (distilled water:
acetonitrile = 2: 1). The resulting was stirred over 10 h. Then adjusted
the above turbid solution to pH = 2.3 by the solution of 1 mol⋅Lꢀ 1 dilute
HCl. Then the mixture was moved into a 25 mL Teflon-lined autoclave,
and heated at 130 ℃. After the three days, yellow rhombic single
crystals were obtained with a yield of 52.49 %, based Cu element.
Elemental analyses (EA) and ICP calcd (%) For Cu2C12H8N4: C, 42.95; H,
2