0.36 mol l21) from the synthesis of 5 was warmed to room temperature (T
= 293 K). To another portion (360 mmol) of 4 450 mg (952 mmol)
MgBr2(thf)4 were added at 270 °C and the suspension warmed to room
temperature. After 2 h the samples were trapped, as described in the
synthesis of 5, with Me3SiCl and the ee-values were determined.
The reaction of 4 with Ph2MeSiCl (220 mg, 945 mmol) was performed
analogously to the method described for 5 resulted in (R)-2 (78 mg, 188
mmol, 52%; ee > 98%).
compound 4 (ee > 98 %) in large amounts and to perform
stereospecific reactions with chlorosilanes. Due to the observed
racemization of 4 in solution, we believe that a thorough
reassessment of previous work concerning optically active
silyllithium species is in order.
We gratefully acknowledge the Deutsche Forschungsge-
meinschaft DFG, the Sonderforschungsbereich (SFB) 347, and
the Fonds der Chemischen Industrie (FCI) for financial
support.
‡ Crystal structure determination of (R)-2·(R)-mandelic acid·H2O (colour-
less crystals from Et2O, 0.40 3 0.40 3 0.20 mm): C34H43NO4Si2, M =
585.89, monoclinic, space group P21 (no. 4), a = 9.886(2), b = 12.973(3),
c = 13.140(3) Å, b = 107.83(3)°, U = 1604.2(6) Å3, Z = 2, Dc = 1.213
Notes and references
Mg m23, Mo-Ka radiation, l
= 0.71073 Å, m = .
0.148 mm21
†
All preparations were performed using standard Schlenk techniques in
Measurements: Stoe IPDS diffractometer, T = 173 K. The structure was
solved using direct and Fourier methods. 18908 reflections measured with
q in the range 2.26–25.99°, 6102 unique reflections; 5693 with I > 2s(I);
refinement by full-matrix least-squares methods (based on Fo2, SHELXL-
93); anisotropic thermal parameters for all non-H atoms in the final cycles;
H atoms were refined on a riding model in their ideal geometric positions;
Flack parameter (20,03(11)); R = 0.0524 [I > 2s(I)], wR(Fo2) = 0.1416
(all data). SHELXS-8615 and SHELXL-9316 computer programs were used.
b111687h/ for crystallographic data in CIF or other electronic format.
an argon atmosphere.
2: A solution of 45.8 g (125 mmol) 1-(chloromethyl)-1,2-dimethyl-
1,2,2-triphenyldisilane (1) and 24.4 g (287 mmol) piperidine were heated
under reflux in toluene (150 ml) for 18 h. After separation of salts and
removing the solvent in vacuo the remaining product was purified by
Kugelrohr distillation (T = 225 °C; p = 1022 mbar) giving 39.2 g (94.3
mmol, 75%) of 2. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3, 25 °C, TMS): d 0.49 (s, 3H;
NCSiCH3), 0.66 (s, 3H; NCSiSiCH3), 1.25–1.40 (m, 2H; NCCCH2),
1.40–1.50 (m, 4H; NCCH2), 2.15–2.30 (m, 4H; NCH2C), 2.22, 2.36 (AB-
system, JAB 14.7 Hz, 2H; SiCH2N), 7.20–7.55 (m, 15H; arom. H); 13C{1H}
NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3, 25 °C, CDCl3): d 24.8, 24.2 (NCSiCH3,
NCSiSiCH3), 23.8 (NCCCH2), 26.2 (2C; NCCH2), 49.2 (SiCH2N), 58.6
(2C; NCH2C), 127.67, 127.72, 127.74 (6C; C-m), 128.6, 128.7, 128.8 (C-p),
134.5, 135.18, 135.23 (6C; C-o), 136.8, 137.1, 137.8 (C-i); 29Si{1H} NMR
(59.6 MHz, CDCl3, 25 °C, TMS): d –23.3, –22.1; MS (EI, 70 eV): m/z (%):
218 (35) {[M 2 SiCH3(C6H5)2]+}, 197 (11) [SiCH3(C6H5)2+], 98 (100)
[(H2CNNC5H10)+].
1 (a) I. Fleming, R. S. Roberts and S. C. Smith, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin
Trans. 1, 1998, 1215–1228; (b) U. Schubert and A. Schenkel, Transition
Met. Chem., 1985, 210–212.
2 A. Sekiguchi, V. Ya. Lee and M. Nanjo, Coord. Chem. Rev., 2000, 210,
11–45.
3 (a) K. Tamao and A. Kawachi, Adv. Organomet. Chem., 1995, 38, 1–58;
(b) P. D. Lickiss and C. M. Smith, Coord. Chem. Rev., 1995, 145,
75–124.
4 L. H. Sommer, J. E. Lyons and H. Fujimoto, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1969,
91, 7051–7061.
5 L. H. Sommer and R. Mason, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1965, 87,
1619–1620.
6 (a) E. Colomer and R. J. P. Corriu, J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun.,
1976, 176–177; (b) E. Colomer and R. J. P. Corriu, J. Organomet.
Chem., 1977, 133, 159–168.
7 J. Lambert and M. Urdaneta-Pérez, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1978, 100,
157–162.
8 R. J. P. Corriu, C. Guerin and J. J. E. Moreau, in The Chemistry of
Organic Silicon Compounds, Part I, ed. S. Patai and Z. Rappoport,
Wiley, Chichester, 1989, pp. 305–370.
9 J. B. Lambert and W. J. Schulz, in The Chemistry of Organic Silicon
Compounds, Part II, ed. S. Patai and Z. Rappoport, Wiley, Chichester,
1989, pp. 1007–1014.
10 A. F. Holleman and E. Wiberg, Lehrbuch der Anorganischen Chemie,
Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, 101st edn., 1995, p. 899.
11 Ch. Elschenbroich and A. Salzer, Organometallics, VCH, Weinheim,
3rd edn., 1992, p. 112.
12 M. Omote, T. Tokita, Y. Shimizu, I. Imae, E. Shirakawa and Y.
Kawakami, J. Organomet. Chem., 2000, 611, 20–25.
13 T. Kobayashi and K. H. Pannell, Organometallics, 1991, 10,
1960–1964.
14 The exact molecular formula of 4 is unknown, but in solution THF
adducts are expected. Therefore all printed formulae of 4 simply
represent the reactivity of this compound.
(R)-2: (R)-2·(R)-mandelic acid·H2O was crystallized from diethyl ether
solutions of 2 with (R)-mandelic acid. Yield relative to the amount of (R)-2
in the diastereomeric salt: 47%, m/z (%): 416 (100) [(M + H)+]; mp 121 °C
(decomp.). Disilane (R)-2 was isolated using 2 M NaOH as a colourless
liquid and purified by Kugelrohr distillation (T = 225 °C; p = 1022 mbar).
The enantiomeric purity was verified by 1H NMR spectroscopy by addition
25
of 3 equiv. of (R)-mandelic acid. [a]D = 27.3 (c = 0.22, Et2O).
5 (ee > 98%): 750 mg (1.80 mmol) (R)-2 were added to a suspension of
37.5 mg (5.40 mmol) lithium in THF (5.0 ml) at 0 °C. At the first change of
colour the solution was immediately cooled to 270 °C and stirred for 5 h at
this temperature. The brown solution of 4 was divided into five equal
portions [five reactions were performed with one single portion (360 mmol)
each]. One portion of 4 was added at 280 °C to a solution of 100 mg (920
mmol) Me3SiCl in THF. Warming to room temperature and removing the
solvent in vacuo lead to an oily residue, which was treated with 2 ml 2 M
HCl. The byproducts were extracted with Et2O. After neutralization to pH
12 the product 5 was extracted with Et2O (70 mg, 240 mmol, 67%; ee >
98%). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3, 25 °C, TMS): d 0.08 (s, 9H;
NCSiSiCH3), 0.39 (s, 3H; NCSiCH3), 1.25–1.40 (m, 2H; NCCCH2),
1.45–1.55 (m, 4H; NCCH2), 2.2022.40 (m, 4H; NCH2C), 2.22, 2.32 (AB-
system, JAB 14.6 Hz, 2H; SiCH2N), 7.25–7.40 (m, 3H; arom. H), 7.45–7.55
(m, 2H; arom. H); 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3, 25 °C, CDCl3): d 25.6
(NCSiCH3), 21.8 (3C; NCSiSiCH3), 23.8 (NCCCH2), 26.3 (2C; NCCH2),
49.1 (SiCH2N), 58.5 (2C; NCH2C), 127.7 (2C; C-m), 128.3 (C-p), 134.1
(2C; C-o), 138.7 (C-i); 29Si{1H} NMR (59.6 MHz, CDCl3, 25 °C, TMS): d
223.3, 218.6; MS (EI, 70 eV): m/z (%): 276 (1) [(M – CH3)+], 218 (12)
{[M 2 Si(CH3)3]+}, 98 (100) (H2CNNC5H10+).
The enantiomeric purity was determined by 1H NMR spectroscopy of 5
25
by addition of 3 equivalents of (R)-mandelic acid. [a]D = 25.1 (c = 0.22,
15 G. M. Sheldrick, SHELXS-86, Program for Crystal Structure Solution,
University of Göttingen, Germany, 1986.
Et2O).
Trapping reactions to determine the stability of the configuration of 4 in
solution: one of the remaining portions of the silyllithium solution 4 (c =
16 G. M. Sheldrick, SHELXL-93, Program for Crystal Structure Refine-
ment, University of Göttingen, Germany, 1993.
CHEM. COMMUN., 2002, 766–767
767