A. Behr et al. / Journal of Molecular Catalysis A: Chemical 406 (2015) 114–117
115
Table 1
Hydroformylation of Cpd.
Run
Catalyst
Additives
Molar ratio Cpd:NEt3
Solvent
Conv.a(%)
Yield(%)
3
4
5
6
1.1
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
1.7
1.8
1.9
1.10
[Rh(cod)Cl]2
Rh(acac)CO2
[Rh(OAc)2]2
[Rh(OAc)2]2
[Rh(OAc)2]2
[Rh(OAc)2]2
[Rh(OAc)2]2
[Rh(OAc)2]2
[Rh(OAc)2]2
[Rh(OAc)2]2
–
–
–
NEt3
NEt3
NEt3
NEt3
NEt3
NEt3
NEt3
–
–
–
2:1
3:1
1:1
1:2
2:1
2:1
2:1
Toluene
Toluene
Toluene
Toluene
Toluene
Toluene
Toluene
Cyclohexane
THF
46
38
55
90
76
77
44
46
42
12
9
5
6
5
18
6
13
4
-
12
-
21
12
18
8
14
15
7
12
11
6
1
2
4
2
5
2
1
-
11
26
56
32
38
26
6
14
3
5
-
DMF
Reaction conditions: 0.3 mol% precursor, 3 mol% BISBI, 5 mmol Cpd, 5 ml solvent, t = 3 h, T = 100 ◦C, 500 rpm, 30 bar CO.
a
Conversion of Cpd determined by GLC.
experiment, the rhodium precursor and phosphorus ligand were
first weighted out and then placed in an inerted Schlenk flask. Then
the reactant (Cpd), the additive triethylamine and the solvent were
added and placed in an ultrasonic bath until all solids were dis-
solved. The reaction mixture was transferred into the evacuated
autoclave and pressurized to the desired syngas pressure. Then the
autoclave was placed in a preheated oil bath at the chosen temper-
ature. The magnetic stirrer was accelerated to 500 rpm. After the
specified reaction time the reaction was stopped by rapidly cool-
ing to room temperature using an ice bath. The excess syngas was
expanded into the hood and the reaction mixture was taken out
Scheme 1. Product range of the hydroformylation of Cpd and Dcpd.
of the autoclave, weighted and then analysed by gas chromatogra-
phy using di-n-butylether as internal standard and isopropanol as
additional solvent if needed.
The experiments for the conversion time plot were conducted
equivalent to the screening experiments, but with sampling of the
reaction media at regular intervals. The reactor, a 300 ml steel auto-
clave (Parr instruments Company), was equipped with a sampling
unit consisting of a capillary in combination with a dosing valve.
This method allowed multiply sampling using the inner gas pres-
sure inside the reactor for the reaction media sampling.
Scheme 2. Possible reaction pathways in the hydroformylation of Cpd.
2.2. Chemicals
3. Results and discussion
All non-aqueous solvents used in this work were purchased
dryly from Acros Organics (Geel, Belgium) with a purity grade of
>99%. Other chemicals were purchased from commercial suppliers
and were of the highest purity available. They were used as received
without further purification. Selected rhodium catalysts were
purchased from Umicore AG & Co., KG (Hanau, Germany). The lig-
and BISBI ([2,2ꢀ-bis-((diphenylphosphino) methyl)-1,1ꢀ-biphenyl],
>99.0%) was purchased from Acros Organics. Argon gas (99.998%,
Messer Industriegase GmbH) and synthesis gas (99.9%, BASF) were
used as received.
3.1. Product range
Cpd was chosen as a cyclic 1,3-diene substrate for the studies on
the hydroformylation reaction. Scheme 1 shows the product range
of the hydroformylation of Cpd 1. First, saturated mono- and dialde-
hydes of Cpd (3 and 4) can be directly obtained through the oxo
synthesis. Dimerization of Cpd via Diels-Alder-reaction gives Dcpd
The formation of 3 is a result of a tandem reaction, which
consists of selective hydrogenation of Cpd to cyclopentene
7
and subsequent hydroformylation to the respective satu-
2.3. Analytics
rated monoaldehyde (Scheme 2). Furthermore, cyclopentene was
observed in low amounts as a byproduct after the reaction was
performed.
Another way to obtain saturated monoaldehyde 3 would be first
hydroformylation to the unsaturated cyclopentene carbaldehyde 8
and subsequent hydrogenation to the saturated monoaldehyde of
Cpd. However, we did observe species 8 only in traces via GC/MS,
so the formation of 3 from 8 has have to be very quick. On the other
hand, cyclopentane dicarbaldehyde 4 was formed as a product in
moderate yield, which is an obvious indication for existing of 8 as
Standard gas chromatographic analyses were performed on a HP
6890 instrument (Hewlett–Packard GmbH, Waldbronn, Germany)
equipped with a flame ionization detector (FID) and a HP5 cap-
illary column (30 m, diameter 0.25 mm, film thickness 0.25 m)
connected to an auto sampler. GC–MS analyses were carried out on
a Hewlett–Packard 5973 (70 eV). All pure components have been
calibrated to determine the conversion (X), yield (Y) and selectivity
(S) of the reaction.