the ketones using LDA or indirectly from silyl enol ethers
using methyllithium.
75% yield using the new method, essentially no reaction
occurred (<4%) when either ethyl formate or 4-nitrophenyl
formate was used as the electrophile under otherwise identical
conditions. When hexafluoroisopropyl formate was used in
place of TFEF, a complicated mixture resulted, but the
desired 2a was not among the many compounds formed.
The R-formyl ketone products in entries 1-6 are acidic
All major types of ketones have been examined (Table
7
1
); the reaction is quite general. The yields given in the
Table 1. R-Formylation of Kinetically-Generated Ketone
Enolates with 2,2,2-Trifluoroethyl Formate.
enough (pK
a
∼10) to protonate starting enolate essentially
irreversibly under the kinetic conditions employed. However,
an excess of base is not required. To account for this, we
believe that the rate of formation of the initial tetrahedral
intermediates is faster than the rate of their subsequent
collapse; as a result, the acidic proton of a product is not
revealed until all (or most) of the enolate has already been
consumed.
The R′-formylation of R,â-unsaturated ketones using
classical Claisen methodology is generally a difficult, low-
yielding affair. Few examples are documented, and even
2a
fewer are satisfactory. Thermodynamically favored γ-depro-
tonation probably confuses the issue. However, because the
R′-carbon is the kinetically-favored site of deprotonation,9
our methodology using kinetically-generated enolates pro-
vides an attractive solution to this problem. Thus, formylation
of 3-methyl-2-cyclohexen-1-one (entry 6) gave R-formyl
ketone 2f in 83% isolated yield, whereas the classical method
7
f
gave this product in only about 35% yield.
Using our method, it is possible to completely reverse the
regioselectivity of the classical Claisen and attach a formyl
(6) Representative Experimental Procedure: Synthesis of hydroxym-
ethylenemethyl 1-adamantyl ketone (2b). A solution of n-BuLi in hexanes
(
3.88 mL, 1.60 M, 6.21 mmol) was cooled to -40 °C in a 100-mL, three-
necked, round-bottomed flask equipped with a stir bar, N2 inlet, and septum.
Ether (7.3 mL) was added followed by the dropwise addition of diisopro-
pylamine (0.870 mL, 6.21 mmol). After 15 min, the solution was cooled to
-
78 °C. A solution of 1b (Aldrich, 99%, 1.00 g, 5.62 mmol) in ether (6
mL) was added dropwise over ca. 4 min. The solution was stirred at -78
C for an additional 45 min. Neat TFEF (3.22 mL, 33.7 mmol) was added
°
rapidly (ca. 2 s), and the mixture was stirred at -78 °C for 2 h. Neat
H2SO4 (1.10 g, 11.2 mmol) was added at -78 °C in 1 portion. The mixture
was transferred to a separatory funnel with ether (20 mL) and water (20
mL). The layers were separated, and the aqueous phase was extracted with
ether (1 × 20 mL). The combined organic extract was washed with saturated
aqueous NH4Cl (1 × 25 mL), dried (MgSO4), and concentrated in vacuo.
The residual yellow oil was dissolved in ether (50 mL) and extracted with
a
2
e rapidly trimerizes to give 1,3,5-tribenzoylbenzene and is isolated in
b
comparable yields of 40-50% using classical methodology. Yield also
includes LiAlH4 reduction of the crude as the resultant diols were more
easily purified.
1
% aqueous NaOH (6 × 10 mL). The yellow extract was kept cold in an
ice/water bath. The cooled extract was acidifed to pH ) 1 by dropwise
addition of 10% hydrochloric acid and then extracted with CH2Cl2 (5 × 20
mL). The combined organic extract was dried (MgSO4) and concentrated
in vacuo to furnish 2b as a yellow, sweet-smelling oil (871 mg, 75%), a
table are of pure products obtained after appropriate
purificationseither extraction into dilute aqueous base
1
1
8
mixture of enol (93%) and keto (7%) isomers by H NMR: H NMR (400
(entries 1-6) or silica gel chromatography (entry 7).
MHz, CDCl3, TMS, enol) δ 15.02 (bs, 1H, CdCOH), 8.13 (d, J ) 4.4 Hz,
Typically, a 6-fold excess of TFEF was employed to
achieve high conversions, although this is probably more than
necessary.
To put the reactivity of TFEF into a useful perspective,
we note that while cyclododecanone (1a) was formylated in
1H, CdCHsOH), 5.63 (d, J ) 4.4 Hz, 1H, HCdCOH), 2.05 (m, 3H, CH),
1
1
.83-1.68 (m, 12H, CH2); H NMR (keto) δ 9.77 (t, J ) 2.8 Hz, 1H,
HCdO), 3.56 (d, J ) 2.8 Hz, 2H, CH2sCHdO), highfield absorptions
13
same as for enol; C NMR (100.6 MHz, CDCl3, enol) δ 203.9 (CdO),
178.5 (CHdCOH), 97.6 (CHdCOH), 42.0, 38.8, 36.6, 28.1.
(7) All products are known compounds. (a) 2a: Wilson, S. R.; Misra,
R. N.; Georgiadis, G. M. J. Org. Chem. 1980, 45, 2460-2468. (b) 2b:
Fisnerova, L.; Nemecek, O.; Musil, V. Collect. Czech. Chem. Commun.
1968, 33, 2681-2689. (c) 2c: Bansal, R. C.; Browne, C. E.; Eisenbraun,
E. J. J. Org. Chem. 1988, 53, 452-455. (d) 2d: Johnson, W. S.; Shelberg,
W. E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1945, 67, 1745-1754. (e) 2e: Pasteur, A.; Rivi e` re,
H.; Tchoubar, B. Bull. Soc. Chim. Fr. 1965, 2328-2332. (f) 2f: Labidalle,
S.; Jean, E.; Moskowitz, H.; Miocque, M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1981, 22, 2869-
2870. Boyer, F.; D e´ combe, J. Bull. Soc. Chim. Fr. 1967, 281-285. (g) 2g:
Tsuboi, S.; Ono, T.; Takeda, A. Heterocycles 1986, 24, 2007-2014.
(8) R-Formyl ketones are sensitive materials (many extremely so). Careful
handling, particularly in the workup and purification is essential.
(9) Carey, F. A.; Sundberg, R. J. AdVanced Organic Chemistry Part B:
Reactions and Synthesis, 3rd ed.; Plenum: New York, 1990; p 7.
(
5) The procedure is a modification of that given in ref 4. 2,2,2-
Trifluoroethanol (Aldrich, 99.5%, 101 g, 1.01 mol) and formic acid (Aldrich,
6%, 186 g, 4.04 mol) were reluxed under N2 for 24 h in a 500-mL, round-
9
bottomed flask equipped with an Allihn condenser and stir bar. The mixture
was cooled to room temperature and the condenser replaced with a 24-cm
Vigreux column and distillation head. A colorless distillate (120 g, bp 55-
6
1 °C) was collected. This was redistilled twice from P2O5 to remove starting
1
1
materials giving TFEF (86.6 g, 67%), pure by H NMR: bp 60 °C; H
NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3, TMS) δ 8.11 (s, 1H, HCdO), 4.56 (q, J ) 8.4
1
3
Hz, 2H, CH2); C NMR (100.6 MHz, CDCl3) δ 159.0 (CdO), 122.9 (q,
J ) 277.0 Hz, CF3), 59.6 (q, J ) 37.1 Hz, CH2).
990
Org. Lett., Vol. 1, No. 7, 1999