and stored in the dark in a sealed amber bottle. CH2Cl2 and
THF were dried by passage through commercial alumina solvent
purification cartridges. GC analyses were performed on a
capillary column instrument and GC-MS determinations on an
ion-trap GC-MS instrument. Specific rotations, [R]D, were
measured at T ) 24 °C and concentration c expressed in g/100
mL. Assignment of 1H and 13C NMR signals was made by
interpretation of gCOSY, NOESY, DEPT, and gHSQC NMR
experiments and comparison with the assigned chemical shifts
of (-)-menthol. The enantiomeric purity of 4a,b was carried out
by by GC using a Cyclodex B column (10.5% â-cyclodextrin in
DB1701, 0.25 µm film × 30 m). Other procedures can be found
elsewhere.11
Hz, H4a), 1.91 (dd, 1H, J ) -6.8, 2.8 Hz, H7′), 1.85 (dd, 1H, J
) 10.0, 7.2 Hz, H4b), 1.38 (m, 1H, H5′), 0.92 (d, 3H, J ) 7.0 Hz,
H10′), 0.90 (d, 3H, J ) 7.0 Hz, H8′ or H9′), 0.76 (d, 3H, J ) 7.2
Hz); 13C NMR (CDCl3) δ 166.6 (s, C1), 76.4 (d, C1′), 57.7 (s, C3),
47.0 (d, C2′), 41.1 (t, C6′), 33.6 (d, C2), 31.6 (d, C5′), 26.3 (d,
C7′), 26.1 (t, C4), 23.5 (t, C3′), 22.1 (q, C10′), 20.9 (q, C8′ or C′9′),
16.4 (q, C9′ or C8′); HR DCIMS m/z 310.1350 [M + NH4]+ (calcd
C14H26Cl2NO2 310.1335). 6b: oil; [R]D ) -89.2 (c 1.42, CHCl3);
IR (NaCl) ν 2956, 2928, 2870, 1734, 1371 cm-1; 1H NMR (CDCl3)
δ 4.74 (dt, 1H, dt, J ) 10.8, 4.4 Hz, H1′), 2.55 (dd, 1H, J ) 10.0,
8.0 Hz, H2), 2.07 (dd, 1H, J ) 8.0, 7.2 Hz, H4a), 1.91 (hd, J )
6.8, 2.8 Hz, 1H, H7′), 1.83 (dd, 1H, J ) 10.0, 7.2 Hz, H4b), 0.91
(d, 3H, J ) 6.8 Hz, H10′), 0.90 (d, 3H, J ) 6.8 Hz, H8′ or H9′),
0.76 (d, 3H, J ) 6.8 Hz, H9′ or H8′); 13C NMR (CDCl3) δ 166.1
(s, C1), 76.0 (d, C1′), 57.4 (s, C3), 46.9 (t, C6′), 34.1 (t, C4′), 33.6
(d, C2), 31.4 (d, C5′), 26.1 (d, H7′), 26.0 (t, C4), 23.3 (t, C3′), 22.0
(q, C10′), 20.7 (q, C8′ or C9′), 16.2 (q, C9′ or C8′); HR DCIMS
m/z 310.1329 [M + NH4]+ (calcd C14H26Cl2NO2 310.1335).
Reduction of (+)-6a. (+)-Chlorocyclopropylmethanol
(4a). Reduction of the menthyl ester (+)-6a was carried out with
LiAlH4 using a modification of the procedure described by Nadim
and co-workers.9a A mixture of LiAlH4 (0.64 g, 17 mmol) in dry
DME (15 mL) was heated at reflux for 6 h before dropwise
addition of a solution of (+)-6a (800 mg, 2.73 mmol) in DME (4
mL). After 12 h, the mixture was cooled in an ice-water bath
and the excess hydride quenched by addition of wet ether
(Caution! Evolution of hydrogen) followed by 4 M NaOH aq.
Extractive workup of the reaction mixture with Et2O followed
by careful flash chromatography (silica, 95:5 CH2Cl2/Et2O) and
removal of solvent at atmospheric pressure gave essentially pure
(+)-(1R,2S)-4a (91%). Chiral GC analysis showed the product
to have >99% ee [([R]24D +59 (c 0.57, CHCl3) (lit.9b [R]27D +58 (c
1.0, CHCl3) for (+)-4]. 1H and 13C NMR spectral properties
matched those of literature values.9b
(-)-Menthyl Acrylate [(-)-5]. Ester (-)-5 was prepared by
base-promoted transesterification according to a modification
of a literature procedure.2 Briefly, lithium menthoxide, pre-
pared by addition of n-butyllithium in hexanes (2.8 M) to (-)-
menthol in dry THF, was treated with O-methyl acrylate in THF
(0 °C to rt). After completion of the reaction and extractive
workup, (-)-5 was obtained in 66% yield ([R]24 -96.4 (c 1.5,
D
CHCl3) [lit.12 -85.4 (c 0.97, CH2Cl2)]. Standard esterification
conditions (acryloyl chloride, (-)-menthol, pyridine, DMAP) gave
inferior yields of (-)-5 (<20%).
Preparative-Scale Dichlorocarbene Addition. Menthyl
Dichlorocyclopropylcarboxylates (+)-6a and (-)-6b. A
solution of (-)-5 (10.0 g, 47.5 mmol) in CHCl3 (final concentration
) 0.6 M) in a 250 mL round-bottom flask was treated with
TMAB (0.366 g, 2.38 mmol, 5 mol %) and powdered KOH (89 g,
1.5 mol, 33 equiv). The flask was immediately sealed with a
rubber septum and the mixture sonicated by immersion in an
ultrasonic cleaning bath (Fisher FS60, 40 kHz, 150 W) contain-
ing ice-water (initial temperature: 0 °C, rising to 25 °C over 3
h), with occasional venting (Caution! Exotherm). The mixture
was cooled and diluted with 1:3 MTBE/hexane, and the filtered
solution washed with aqueous sodium phosphate buffer (0.1 M,
pH 7.5). After drying, the combined extracts (Na2SO4) were
concentrated, and the crude product was purified by silica
chromatography (1:5 CH2Cl2/n-hexane) to give the diastereo-
meric mixture 6a,b (1:1, 13.1 g, 94%). The mixture was dissolved
in pentane (13% w/v) and placed in a low-temperature freezer
(-80 °C) for 1-3 days whereupon crystals of pure (+)-6a (mp
Reduction of (-)-6a. (-)-Chlorocyclopropylmethanol
(4b). Reduction of (-)-6b (88% de, GC) was carried out using
LiAlH4 in refluxing DME, as described for (+)-6a, to give (-)-
4b ([R]27 -54 (c 0.44, CHCl3)).
D
Acknowledgment. We thank J. Berg (UC Davis,
Department of Chemistry) and S. Stanley (Equine
Analytical Chemistry Laboratory, UC Davis, CA) for
help with GCMS measurements, C. Liu for initial
preparation of 6a,b mixtures, and R. New (UC River-
side) for high-resolution mass spectra. This work was
funded by the NIH (CA 85602).
1
76 °C, >95% de, H NMR integration) were deposited, leaving
behind 6b (∼75-88% de) in the mother liquors. 6a: mp 76 °C;
[R]D ) +1.88 (c 1.17, CHCl3); IR (NaCl) ν 2952, 2930, 2870, 1728,
1
1385 cm-1; H NMR (CDCl3) δ 4.74 (td, J ) 10.8, 4.4 Hz, H1′),
2.54 (dd, 1H, J ) 10.0, 8.0 Hz, H2), 2.07 (dd, 1H, J ) 8.0, 7.2
Supporting Information Available: 1H and 13C NMR
spectra of (+)-6a and (-)-6b. This material is available free
(11) Searle, P. A.; Molinski, T. F. J. Org. Chem. 1993, 58, 7578-
7580.
(12) Lee-Ruff, E.; Xi, F.; Qie, J. H. J. Org. Chem. 1996, 61, 1547-
1550. (b) Moureu, C.; Murat, M.; Tampier, L. C. R. Hebd. Seances Acad.
Sci. 1921, 172, 1269.
JO0480186
J. Org. Chem, Vol. 70, No. 10, 2005 4165