Quinazolinone Antagonist for FPRL1
977
itate the understanding of this receptor as a new therapeutic ylacetamide catalyzed by acetic acid) using molecular sieve as dehy-
drate reagent.
target.
Among the FPR family of receptors, FPRL1 has the broad-
Ligand Binding Assay. Ligand binding assay was performed as
described previously (Yan et al., 2006). RBL-FPRL1 cells (ϳ109) were
harvested and washed twice with phosphate-buffered saline. Cell
membrane was prepared with BioNeb Cell Disruption System (Glas-
Col, Terre Haute, IN). Various concentrations of compounds were
incubated together with RBL-FPRL1 cell membrane preparation,
0.16 nM [125I]WKYMVm (PerkinElmer Life and Analytical Sciences,
Kd ϭ 0.32 nM), and FlashBlue GPCR beads (100 g/well) to give a
final volume of 0.1 ml. The plates were incubated at 4°C for 12 h and
est spectrum of ligands (Migeotte et al., 2006). Except for one
lipid (lipoxin A4), all identified FPRL1 ligands are small
peptides and include host-derived agonist LL-37, natural or
synthetic peptides (humanin, MMK-1, and WKYMVm), and
peptides derived from HIV-1 envelope proteins (Le et al.,
1999; Yang et al., 2000). These pharmacological properties of
FPRL1 imply that it is a potential target for therapeutic
intervention. However, identification of antagonists for this centrifuged for 3 min at 2500g before counting on a MicroBeta
scintillation counter (PerkinElmer Life and Analytical Sciences). To
test the binding affinity for FPR, RBL-FPR cells (1 ϫ 105) were
seeded onto 24-well plates and incubated for 48 h. After being
washed twice with blocking buffer (RPMI 1640 medium supple-
mented with 25 mM HEPES and 0.1% BSA, pH 7.5), cells were
incubated with blocking buffer for 2 h and then sequentially with 30
nM [3H]fMLF and different concentrations of C7 or unlabeled fMLF
in binding buffer (phosphate-buffered saline with 10% BSA) for
another 2 h. Radioactivity was measured as above.
receptor has met with difficulties. A new peptide (WRW-
WWW; WRW4) has been identified as an antagonist for
FPRL1 by screening a hexapeptide library (Bae et al., 2003).
Because of inherent limitations of peptides as therapeutic
agents, it is desirable to develop synthetic, nonpeptidic li-
gands for receptors. Not long ago, we initiated a high-
throughput screening (HTS) campaign to identify FPRL1
ligands from a synthetic compound library. After vigorous
screening and structure modification, a substituted quinazo-
Reporter Assay. HeLa cells expressing NF-B-Luc/FPRL1
linone compound (Quin-C1; 4-butoxy-N-[2-(4-methoxy-phe- (HeLa-B-FPRL1) were seeded onto 96-well plates at a density of
1.5 ϫ 104 cells/well. After cells became adherent, they were serum-
nyl)-4-oxo-1,4-dihydro-2H-quinazolin-3-yl]-benzamide) was
starved in DMEM for 16 h before screening assay. Different concen-
discovered. This compound (C1) displayed selective agonistic
trations of compounds were added to the cells for 5 h, and the
effects on FPRL1 (Nanamori et al., 2004). As an ongoing
expressed luciferase activity was determined in an EnVision 2101
effort to study the structure-activity relationship (SAR) of the
multilabel reader (PerkinElmer Life and Analytical Sciences) using
original compound, we designed, synthesized, and character-
the Steady-Glo Luciferase Assay solutions.
ized a series of substituted quinazolinone derivatives as mod-
ulating agents for FPRL1. Our results indicate that a hy-
droxyl substitution on the para position of the 2-phenyl group
of the quinazolinone backbone resulted in a pure antagonist,
Quin-C7 (C7), which displayed inhibitory effects on FPRL1.
Calcium Mobilization Assay. Calcium mobilization assay was
performed as described previously (Yan et al., 2006). In brief, RBL-
FPRL1 cells were detached and collected by centrifugation, loaded
with 5 M Fluo-4/AM (Invitrogen) in Hanks’ balanced salt solution
supplemented with 2.5 mM probenecid for 45 min, and then washed
twice with Hanks’ balanced salt solution. Cell suspensions were
adjusted to a density of 5 ϫ 106 cells/ml and seeded onto 96-well
plates (100 l/well). Cells were reattached by centrifugation and
then analyzed for calcium mobilization using FlexStation (Molecular
Devices, Sunnyvale, CA) with excitation wavelength at 485 nm and
emission wavelength at 525 nm. For antagonist mode, cells were
incubated with or without test compounds for 15 min before the
addition of WKYMVm (2 nM) or C1 (5 M). For detailed character-
ization of RBL-FPRL1 cells, calcium mobilization assays were con-
ducted on a spectrofluorometer (Photon Technology Inc., Law-
renceville, NJ), using Indo-1 as indicator and procedures described
previously (Nanamori et al., 2004)
Materials and Methods
Materials. WKYMVm was synthesized at GL Biochem (Shang-
hai) Ltd. (Shanghai, China). WRW4 and MMK-1 were made at HD
Biosciences Co. (Shanghai, China). 125I-WKYMVm (Bolton-Hunter-
labeled), [3H]fMLF, and FlashBlue GPCR scintillating beads were
obtained from PerkinElmer Life and Analytical Sciences (Waltham,
MA). Steady-Glo Luciferase Assay Solutions were purchased from
Promega Corporation (Madison, WI). Fluo-4/acetoxymethyl ester,
Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) culture medium, and
trypsin were bought from Invitrogen (Carlsbad, CA). Fetal bovine
serum (FBS) was purchased from HyClone Laboratories (Logan,
UT). The anti-ERK1/2 and anti-phospho-ERK antibodies were pro-
cured from Cell Signaling Technologies (Danvers, MA). Other re-
agents were supplied by Sigma Chemical Co. (St. Louis, MO).
Cell Culture. The human cervical carcinoma cell line HeLa was
transfected with pNF-B-Luc reporter plasmid that contains five
copies of NF-B binding sequence (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA) and a
human FPRL1 cDNA expression vector in pSFFV.neo vector as re-
ported previously (Nanamori et al., 2004; Tian et al., 2005). The
transfected cells were maintained in DMEM supplemented with 10%
FBS. Rat basophilic leukemia cell line RBL-2H3 expressing either
the human FPRL1 (RBL-FPRL1) or human FPR (RBL-FPR) was
described previously and was maintained in DMEM supplemented
with 20% FBS (He et al., 2000).
Chemotaxis. WKYMVm and C1-induced migration of cells was
assessed in a 48-well microchemotaxis chamber (Neuro Probe, Cabin
Compound Synthesis. The quinazolinone series compounds
were synthesized according to the method described previously
(Mayer et al., 1997), and the synthetic route is shown in Fig. 1.
Anthranilic acid derivative 5 was obtained subsequently via reduc-
tion of compound 4 with zinc and acetic acid in CH2Cl2. Moderate to
high yield was achieved through refluxing compound 5 with different
substituted benzaldehydes in a mixed solvent (CH2Cl2/N,N-dimeth-
Fig. 1. The synthetic route of quinazolinone C. Reagents and conditions:
a, 1: NaOH, MeOH, 0°C, 20 min; 2: n-BuBr, MeOH, reflux, 5 h; b,
N2H4.H2O, MeOH, reflux, 6 h; c, 2-nitrobenzoyl chloride, Et3N, CH2Cl2,
0°C to room temperature, overnight; d, Zn, AcOH, CH2Cl2, 0°C to room
temperature, 4 h; e, substituted benzaldehyde, AcOH/N,N-dimethyl-
acetamide/CH2Cl2 (5:5:90), 4A molecular sieve, reflux, 12 h.