[()TD$FIG]
H.Z. Fu et al. / Chinese Chemical Letters 22 (2011) 178–180
179
OH
6
'
4
'
5
'
O
HO
3
12
1
'
OH
HO
O
1
3
1
1
1
0
OH
2'
2
1
3'
4
H
5
8
7
9
6
OH
O
Fig. 1. Structure of compound 1.
2
D
0
Compound 1 was obtained as a yellow powder, mp 170–171 8C. ½aꢀ ꢁ80.4 (c 0.03, MeOH). UV (MeOH) l
max
ꢁ
1
(
log e): 298 (1.59), 250 (1.51) nm. The IR spectrum indicated the presence of hydroxy (3344 cm ). The negative
ꢁ
+
ESIMS of 1 gave a quasi-molecular ion peak at m/z 391.5 [MꢁH] , while the positive ESIMS exhibited [M+Na] at m/
+
z 415.1. The HRESIMS displayed a quasi-molecular ion at m/z 415.10012 [M+Na] (calcd. 415.10050 for
1
C H NaO ), indicating the molecular formula of 1 was C H O . The H NMR spectrum of 1 showed signals of two
magnetic equivalent phenolic hydroxyls (d 9.82, s, 2H) and two magnetic equivalent aromatic protons (d 6.08, s, 2H).
1
9
20
9
19 20 9
1
In the aromatic region of the H NMR spectrum, a set of aromatic signals at d 7.68 (d, 2H, J = 7.5 Hz, H-9 and H-13), d
7
aliphatic region, a characteristic doublet at 4.76 (d, 1H, J = 8.0 Hz, H-1 ) assignable to an anomeric proton indicated
.57 (t, 1H, J = 7.5 Hz, H-11), and d 7.46 (d, 2H, J = 7.5 Hz, H-10 and H-12) were assigned to a benzene ring. In the
0
1
3
the presence of sugar unit in the molecule, The C NMR spectrum displayed a signal at d 195.4, which was assigned to
the carbonyl group of a benzophenone [7–9], and six aliphatic carbon signals (d 100.3, 77.0, 76.5, 73.1, 69.4, and 60.4)
due to one sugar moiety. In addition 12 aromatic carbons were also detected, some of them being superimposed (d
1
60.1, 1C; 157.3, 2C; 138.5, 1C; 132.5, 1C; 128.7, 2C; 128.3, 2C; 108.8, 1C; 95.0, 2C), suggesting that there were two
aromatic rings. The acid hydrolysis of 1 with 5 mol/L HCl liberated D-glucose, which was identified by TLC analysis
and ORD in comparison with authentic D-glucose. In HMBC spectrum of 1 (Fig. 2), the aromatic protons at d 7.68 (H-
9
and H-13) show cross-peaks with the carbonyl carbon (d 195.4), two aromatic protons at d 6.08 (s, 2H) correlated
with C-1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 implied that the two aromatic protons were located at C-3 and C-5, while hydroxyl groups at d
.82 (s, 2H) showed correlations with C-1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, which suggested the two hydroxyl groups was placed at C-2 and
C-6. The anomeric proton at d 4.76 exhibited HMBC cross-peaks with a C-4 quaternary carbon at d 160.1, therefore C-
was identified as the linkage position of glucoside. The relative configuration of the anomeric carbon of glucosyl
residue was deduced to be b, based on the coupling constant value (J1
¼ 8:0 Hz) and comparison of the NMR spectra
9
4
0
;4
with those of known compounds [10]. In light of the evidence mentioned above, the structure of 1 was established as
2
,6-dihydroxy-4-O-b-D-glucopyranosylbenzophenone (Table 1).
The inhibitory activity on NO production was carried out according to the procedure described in the literature [11].
showed significant inhibition to secretion of NO in mouse peritoneal macrophages, inhibition rate was 38.60% in
0 mmol/L, and 1 did not show significant inhibition to the growth of mouse peritoneal macrophages.
1
1
[
(
)
T
D
$
F
I
G
]
OH
6
'
4
'
5
'
O
HO
3
12
1
'
OH
HO
O
1
3
1
1
1
0
OH
2
'
2
1
3
'
4
H
5
8
7
9
6
OH
O
Fig. 2. Key HMBC correlations of compound 1.