H.-Y. Zhao et al.
Fitoterapia 151 (2021) 104877
′′′
′′′
′′′
′′′
′′′
′′′
2
.4. Acid hydrolysis of compounds 1–6
7 (δ 7.37)/H-8 (δ 6.08) to the carbonyl C-9 (δ 168.7), from H-7
H H C
′
′′
′′′
to C-2 (δ
C
111.5)/C-6 (δ
C
124.1), and from 3 -OMe (δ
H
3.87)/H-2
′
′′
′′′
Each of 1–6 (each 1.0 mg) was added to 1.0 mL of 8% hydrochloric
(δ 7.02)/H-5 (δ
H
H
6.78) to C-3 (δ
C
149.2) indicated that a feruloyl
◦
acid. The reaction mixture was refluxed at 80 C for 6 h and extracted
moiety was esterified with 6-OH of the sugar. The other 14 aromatic
carbon signals and one carbonyl were assigned to a kaempferol skeleton
including a 5,7-dihydroxy A-ring and a 1,4-disustituted B-ring, based on
with EtOAc (3 × 2 mL) to remove the aglycone. The aqueous layer was
2
subjected to silica gel CC (EtOAc/EtOH/H O, 7:4:1) to obtain the sugar
fraction. The optical rotation of sugar fraction was afforded by JASCO P-
000 polarimeter. The positive optical rotation of the sugar were
the significant HMBC correlations from H-6 (δ
H
6.10) to C-5/C-7/C-8/C-
′
′
2
10, from H-8 (δ 6.29) to C-6/C-7/C-9/C-10, as well as from H-2 /H-6
H
1
1
′
′
compared with those of literature data, confirming the sugar to be D-
configuration [7].
(δ
H
8.05) to C-2, the H- H COSY correlations (Fig. 2) of H-2 /6 and H-
′
′
3 /5 (δ
H
6.85) together with its molecular. Meanwhile, the obvious
HMBC correlation of the anomeric proton [δ
H
5.12 (1H, d, J = 7.8 Hz)]
and C-3 implied that the sugar was connected at C-3 of the kaempferol
unit. To established the absolute configuration of the galactopyranosyl
unit, acid hydrolysis was carried out and the sugar moiety was deduced
to be D-galactose based on the positive optical rotation [11]. Therefore,
2
.5. NO production measurements and cell viability assays
The antineuroinflammatory activities of all isolates were evaluated
by Griess reaction and MTT assays including the tests of NO production
and cell viability in lipopolysaccharide (LPS) induced BV-2 microglial
cells, as described in our previous study [6,9].
′
′
1
was
established
as
kaempferol
3-O-(6 -O-feruloyl)-β-D-
galactopyranoside.
The HRESIMS data of 2 showed a hydrogen adduct ion at m/z
+
7
77.1657 [M + H] (calcd for 777.1661), consistent with the molecular
3
. Results and discussion
1
13
32
formula of C38H O18. Its H and C NMR data (Table 1) showed a high
similarity to those of 1, except for the presence of a galloyl moiety [δ
68.0, 146.4 (2C), 139.9, 121.6, and 110.6 (2C); δ
HMBC spectrum (Fig. 3), the obvious cross peaks from H-2 (δ
C
3
.1. Structural identification
1
H
7.16 (2H, s)]. In the
′
′
H
5.45)
Compound 1 was isolated as a yellow, amorphous powder with a
′
′′′
′′′′
′′′′
+
and H-2 /6 (δ
H
C
7.16) to C-7 (δ 168.0) indicated that the galloyl
sodium adduct ion at m/z 647.1373 [M + Na] (calcd for 647.1371)
from the positive HRESIMS data, which together with the 13C NMR data
unit was esterified with 2-OH of the sugar. The chemical shifts of the
′
′
′′
′′
sugar group, the coupling constants of H-1 /H-2 (8.1 Hz) and H-3 /H-
indicated that it has a molecular formula of C31
H
28
ꢀ 1
O
14. The presence of
′
′
ꢀ 1
4
(3.0 Hz), together with acid hydrolysis and optical rotation experi-
hydroxy (3445 cm ), ester carbonyl (1655 cm ), and aromatic ring
ꢀ 1
ments supported the presence of β-D-galactopyranosyl unit. Finally, the
(
1609, 1507 cm ) functionalities was evident from its IR absorption
′
′
′′
1
structure of 2 was determined to be kaempferol 3-O-(2 -O-galloyl-6 -O-
feruloyl)-β-D-galactopyranoside.
peaks. The H NMR spectrum of 1 (Table 1) exhibited the presence of an
AX spin system [δ 6.29 (1H, br s, H-8) and 6.10 (1H, br s, H-6)], an
AA BB spin system [δ
H
′
′
′
′
Compound 3, a yellow amorphous powder, has a molecular formula
H
8.05 (2H, d, J = 9.0 Hz, H-2 , 6 ) and 6.85 (2H, d,
′
′
of C37
30
H O17, which was deduced by the positive-ion HERSIMS (m/z
J = 9.0 Hz, H-3 , 5 )], an ABX spin system [δ 7.02 (1H, d, J = 1.2 Hz, H-
H
+
13
′′′
′′′
747.1556 [M + H] , calcd for 747.1556) and C NMR data. The data of
2
), 6.89 (1H, dd, J = 8.4, 1.2 Hz, H-6 ), and 6.78 (1H, dd, J = 8.4 Hz,
1
13
′′′
′′′
its H and C NMR spectra together with the HSQC spectrum indicated
the existent of characteristic moieties including a galactose group, a
flavonol core with 5,7-disubstituted A-ring and 1,4-disustituted B-ring, a
galloyl group, an olefinic bond, and an aromatic ring. The obvious dif-
ference was the disappearance of the methoxy and 1,3,4-tirsubstituted
aromatic ring as well as the presence of another 1,4-disubstituted aro-
matic ring, compared with 2, speculating that a coumaroyl unit in 3
replaced the feruloyl unit in 2. The above deduction and the location of
these moieties were further verified by the significant HMBC correla-
H-5 )], a trans-double bond [δ
H
7.37 (1H, d, J = 16.2 Hz, H-7 ) and 6.08
′
′′
(
1H, d, J = 16.2 Hz, H-8 )], a sugar unit (δ 3.57–5.12), and a methoxy
H
3.87 (3H, s)]. Its 1 C NMR spectrum displayed 25 resonances
105.0, 74.9, 74.8, 72.9, 70.3, and
114.9 and 146.8), a
94.7–179.6) (Table 1). These
3
group [δ
aside from those of a sugar unit (δ
H
C
6
4.4), characteristic for a trans-olefinic bond (δ
C
2
methoxy (δ
C
56.4), and 22 sp carbons (δ
C
spectral properties showed many similarities with those of 8 [10],
implying 1 also being a flavonol glycoside.
Subsequently, its 2D NMR spectra strongly supported the above
inference. The structure of the sugar moiety could be fully confirmed by
the H–1H COSY correlations of H-1 (δ
3
′
′
tions, especially the correlations from H-1 (δ
H
5.61) to C-3 (δ
C
134.6),
′
′
′′′
′′′
′′′
1
′′
′′
′′
from H
2
-6 (δ
H
4.41 and 4.19)/H-7 (δ
H
7.40)/H-8 (δ
H
6.05) to C-9
H
5.12)/H-2 (δ
H
3.80)/H-3 (δ
H
′
′′
′′′
′′
′
′
′′
′′
(δ
(δ
C
168.7), from H-2 (δ
5.45)/H-2 (δ
H
7.28) to C-7 (δ
C
146.6), and from H-2
.57)/H-4 (δ
H
3.82)/H-5 (δ
H
3.76)/H
2
-6 (δ
H
4.39 and 4.12) in Fig. 2
′
′′′
′′′′
3
H
H
7.16) to C-7 (δ
C
168.0). The result of acid
together with its HSQC spectrum. Additionally, the large
J
1
′′, 2′′ value
3
hydrolysis defined the existence of D-galactose. The structure of 3 was
(
7.8 Hz) and the small J
′′, 4′′ value (3.0 Hz) (Table 1) proven that it was
3
′
′
′′
assigned as kaempferol 3-O-(2 -O-galloyl-6 -O-p-coumaroyl)-β-D-
galactopyranoside.
a β-configured galactose. The prominent HMBC cross peaks (Fig. 2) from
′′
2
the nonequivalent methylene protons H -6 and two olefinic protons H-
Compound 4 was obtained as a yellow amorphous power. Its mo-
lecular formula was the same as 3, as confirmed through its HRESIMS
+
13
ion at m/z 747.1556 [M + H] (calcd for 747.1556) and C NMR
spectroscopic data. From the 1D and 2D NMR data, it was observed that
the only difference of 3 and 4 in structure was the geometry of the sugar
′
′
′′
moiety, particularly a series of large coupling constants of H-1 /H-2
′′ ′′ ′′ ′′ ′′ ′′
(
8.1 Hz), H-2 /H-3 (9.6 Hz), H-3 /H-4 (9.0 Hz), and H-4 /H-5 (9.6
′
′
′′
Hz) in 4 whereas the relatively small coupling constant of H-3 /4 in 3,
supporting that 4 possessed a β-glucopyranosyl unit. The D-configura-
tion was determined by acid hydrolysis experiment including TLC and
the positive optical rotation results. Thus, the structure of 4 was
′
′
′′
concluded to be kaempferol 3-O-(2 -O-galloyl-6 -O-p-coumaroyl)-β-D-
glucopyranoside.
Compound 5 had the identical molecular formula of C38
H
32
O
18 with
1
3
2
, as was evident from its C NMR and positive-ion HRESIMS data (m/z
+
1
13
7
77.1666 [M + H] , calcd for 777.1661). Inspection of its H and
C
1
1
Fig. 2. Key Hꢀ H COSY and HMBC correlations of 1.
NMR data (Table 1) and 2D NMR spectra suggested that its structure
4