the hydrolysis of cellulose is strongly dependent on the
sulfonation temperature of the carbon materials; 250 1C-
sulfonation was proved to generate a high acid density and
meanwhile did not cause a severe decrease in the specific
surface area. In addition, the carbon source also has a great
impact on the acid density of the sulfonated carbons.
The correlation between the acid density and the catalytic
performance established here will guide the design of new solid
acids for a variety of acid-catalyzed reactions.
Support from the Natural Science Foundation of China
(
NSFC Nos. 20773124, 20903089) and from the 973 Program
of China (2009CB226102) are gratefully acknowledged
Fig. 1 Hydrolysis of cellulose over different carbons sulfonated at
50 1C. The yield of water soluble by-products was calculated from the
difference between the conversion of cellulose and the yield of glucose
according to ref. 13.
2
Notes and references
1 R. Rinaldi and F. Schu
H. Li, W. Wanga and J. F. Deng, J. Catal., 2000, 191, 257;
X. Liang, C. J. Liu and P. Y. Kuai, Green Chem., 2008, 10,
1318; T. Stahlberg, M. G. Sørensen and A. Riisager, Green Chem.,
¨
th, Energy Environ. Sci., 2009, 2, 610.
2
a type of ordered mesoporous material, gave a conversion of
cellulose of 94.4% and a glucose yield of 74.5%, which almost
˚
1
3
2010, 12, 321; M. S. Holm, S. Saravanamurugan and E. Taarning,
Science, 2010, 328, 602; W. Yang and A. Sen, ChemSusChem,
doubles that reported by Onda et al. This is also the highest
glucose yield achieved on solid acids to date. Correlating with the
acid densities of the samples in Table 2, one can find that the
catalytic performance is well consistent with the acid densities of
the carbon materials except for the Cell-Carbon (cellulose-derived
2
010, 3, 597.
3 L. T. Fan, M. M. Gharpuray and Y. H. Lee, Cellulose Hydrolysis,
Springer, Berlin, 1987; M. A. Harmer, A. Fan, A. Liauwa and
R. K. Kumarc, Chem. Commun., 2009, 6610.
4
Y. P. Zhang, M. E. Himmel and J. R. Mielenz, Biotechnol. Adv.,
006, 24, 452.
carbon). Although possessing
a high acid density, the
2
Cell-Carbon has a very low specific surface area which signifi-
cantly decreases the available active sites for the hydrolysis of
cellulose. On the other hand, the sulfonated CMK-3 has a high
5 M. Sasaki, Z. Fang, Y. Fukushima, T. Adschiri and K. Arai, Ind.
Eng. Chem. Res., 2000, 39, 2883; Y. Zhao, W. J. Lu, H. T. Wang
and D. Li, Environ. Sci. Technol., 2009, 43, 1565.
6
R. P. Swatloski, S. K. Spear, J. D. Holbrey and R. D. Rogers,
J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2002, 124, 4974.
2
À1
acid density and a reasonably large surface area (412 m g ),
both of which are required for the hydrolysis of cellulose into
glucose. In addition, the mesoporous structure also facilitates the
transportation of large molecules (such as glucose, cellobiose,
cellotriose) in comparison with microporous carbons. The
advantages of mesoporous carbons as the catalyst supports have
recently been demonstrated in hydrogenolysis of cellulose as well
7
C. Li and Z. K. Zhao, Adv. Synth. Catal., 2007, 349, 1847;
A. S. Amarasekara and O. S. Owereh, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res.,
2
009, 48, 10152.
8
9
A. Fukuoka and P. L. Dhepe, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2006, 45,
5161.
C. Luo, S. Wang and H. C. Liu, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2007, 46,
7636.
1
0 N. Ji, T. Zhang, M. Y. Zheng, A. Q. Wang, H. Wang, X. D. Wang
and J. G. Chen, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2008, 47, 8510.
12,19
as hydrolysis of cellulose.
In summary, we have developed a highly active and selective
solid acid catalyst for the hydrolysis of cellulose into glucose.
The best result was obtained by using 250 1C-sulfonated
CMK-3 as the catalyst, with the cellulose conversion of
11 M. Y. Zheng, A. Q. Wang, N. Ji, J. F. Pang, X. D. Wang and
T. Zhang, ChemSusChem, 2010, 3, 63.
1
2 Y. H. Zhang, A. Q. Wang and T. Zhang, Chem. Commun., 2010,
6, 862.
4
13 A. Onda, T. Ochi and K. Yanagisawa, Green Chem., 2008, 10, 1033;
A. Onda, T. Ochi and K. Yanagisawa, Top. Catal., 2009, 52, 801.
9
4.4% and glucose yield of 74.5% which is the highest value
1
4 M. Toda, A. Takagaki, M. Okamura, J. N. Kondo, S. Hayashi,
K. Domen and M. Hara, Nature, 2005, 438, 178; S. Suganuma,
K. Nakajima, M. Kitano, D. Yamaguchi, H. Kato, S. Hayashi and
M. Hara, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2008, 130, 12787; Y. Y. Wu,
Z. H. Fu, D. L. Yin, Q. Xu, F. L. Liu, C. L. Lu and L. Q. Mao,
Green Chem., 2010, 12, 696.
obtained so far on solid acids. The acid density required for
Table 2 The surface properties of different carbons sulfonated
at 250 1C
Acid
density
mmol g
Acid
density
mmol g
15 R. Rinaldi, R. Palkovits and F. Schu
2008, 47, 8047.
16 K. Shimizu, H. Furukawa, N. Kobayashi, Y. Itaya and
¨
th, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.,
a
H /
b/
c/
–SO
mmol g
3
BET
S /
2
À1
À1
À1
À1
m g
Cat.
A. Satsuma, Green Chem., 2009, 11, 1627.
7 A. Takagaki, C. Tagusagawa and K. Domen, Chem. Commun.,
008, 5363.
8 ACB refers to acetylene carbon black, MWCNT refers to multiwall
carbon nanotube, Cell-Carbon was prepared by pyrolysis of
cellulose at 400 1C according to ref. 14, Resin-Carbon was
prepared by pyrolysis of resin at 800 1C, and CSAC refers to
coconut shell active carbon. For preparation details see supporting
information.
ACB
0.02
0.02
0.63
2.01
0.28
0.33
0.24
0.26
2.39
3.96
2.08
1.10
0.07
0.05
0.88
1.22
0.45
0.28
89
96
412
6
834
981
1
1
MWCNT
CMK-3
Cell-Carbon
Resin-Carbon
CSAC
2
d
a
b
3
The content of –SO H was measured by ICP-AES. Acid density
c
was determined by a titration method. Acid density was measured by
d
19 H. Kobayashi, T. Komanoya, K. Hara and A. Fukuoka,
ChemSusChem, 2010, 3, 440.
3
NH -adsorption. Cell-Carbon was sulfonated at 200 1C.
This journal is c The Royal Society of Chemistry 2010
Chem. Commun., 2010, 46, 6935–6937 6937