Please do not adjust margins
Journal of Materials Chemistry A
Page 6 of 7
DOI: 10.1039/C8TA07391K
ARTICLE
Journal Name
3
4
5
Y. Zheng, L. Lin, B. Wang, X. Wang, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.,
2015, 54, 12868-12884.
samples were prepared by mixing ground polymer with 5 wt%
Nafion. The Mott-Schottky tests were carried out in 0.1 M
Na2SO4 solution as supporting electrolyte and the pH value is
7. LUMO levels were calculated from the Mott-Schottky
measurements, in which the flat band potential can be first
obtained according to the potential intercept, which was
reversible Ag/AgCl electrode. Then the LUMO values of CTFs
were transformed to reversible hydrogen electrode (RHE)
T. Hisatomi, J. Kubota, K. Domen, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2014, 43
7520-7535.
,
R. Sprick, B. Bonillo, R. Clowes, P. Guiglion, N. Brownbill, B.
Slater, F. Blanc, M. Zwijnenburg, D. Adams, A. Cooper,
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2016, 55, 1792-1796.
W. Duncan, R. Sprick, C. Smith, A. Cowan, A. Cooper, Adv.
Energy Mater., 2017, 7, 1700479-1700485.
D. Zheng, X.N. Cao, X. Wang, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2016, 55
11512-11516.
X. Wang, K. Maeda, A. Thomas, K. Takanabe, G. Xin, J. M.
Carlsson, K. Domen, Nat. Mater., 2009, 8, 76-80.
R. Sprick, B. Bonillo, M. Sachs, R. Clowes, J. Durrant, D.
6
7
8
9
,
according to the Nernst equation LUMORHE
0.059*pH + 0.2. The final experimental HOMO value can be
calculated according to the equation EBandgap = HOMORHE
LUMORHE
= EAg/AgCl +
-
.
Adams, A. Cooper, Chem. Commun., 2016, 52, 10008-10011.
10 L. Li, Z. Cai, Q. Wu, W. Y. Lo, N. Zhang, L. Chen, L. Yu, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 2016, 138, 7681-7686.
11 P. Pachfule, A. Acharjya, J. Roeser, T. Langenhahn, M.
Schwarze, R. Schomäcker, A. Thomas, J. Schmidt, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 2018, 140, 1423-1427.
Gaussian 09 program package was employed for calculating
the electronic structures of ground and excited states of the
model structures.35 The geometries of the ground states were
optimized with DFT, and TDDFT was applied for the calculation
of vertical excited energies.36-38 The B3LYP functional and 6-
311G (d, p) basis set were used in the calculation. The
Polarizable Continuum Model (PCM) was used to simulate the
solvation effect.39-42 The dielectric constant of the solvent was
set to be 73.
12 L. Wang, Y. Wan, Y. Ding, S. Wu, Y. Zhang, X. Zhang, G. Zhang,
,
Y. Xiong, X. Wu, J. Yang, H. Xu, Adv. Mater., 2017, 29
1702428.
13 K. Schwinghammer, S. Hug, M. Mesch, J. Senkerd, B. V.
Lotsch, Energ. Environ. Sci., 2015, , 3345-3353.
8
14 S. Kuecken, A. Acharjya, L. Zhi, M. Schwarze, R. Schomäcker,
A. Thomas, Chem. Commun., 2017, 53, 5854-5857.
15 C. Meier, R. Sprick, A. Monti, P. Guiglion, J. S. Lee, M.
Zwijnenburg, A. Cooper, Polymer, 2017, 126, 283-290.
16 R. Sprick, J. Jiang, B. Bonillo, S. Ren, T. Ratvijitvech, P.
Guiglion, M. A. Zwijnenburg, D. Adams, A. Cooper, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 2015, 137, 3265-3270.
17 C. Yang, B. C. Ma, L. Zhang, S. Lin, S. Ghasimi, K. Landfester,
K. Zhang, X. Wang, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2016, 55, 9202-
9206.
Photocatalytic measurements.
The photocatalytic experiments were conducted with 300W Xe
lamp (Perfectlight, PLS-SXE300) under visible light irradiation (
> 420 nm). 50.0 mg Photocatalyst loading with Pt and 10 mL
TEOA were mixed in 100 mL aqueous solution. Pt nanoparticles
were deposited first in CTFs by chemical reduction method
using NaBH4. The temperature of the solution was maintained
at 25°C. The hydrogen evolution was analyzed by gas
chromatography (SHIMADZU, GC-2014 C).
18 V. S. Vyas, F. Haase, L. Stegbauer, G. Savasci, F. Podjaski, C.
Ochsenfeld, B. V. Lotsch, Nat. Commun., 2015, 6, 8508.
19 J. Bi, W. Fang, L. Li, J. Wang, S. Liang, Y. He, M. Liu, L. Wu,
Macromol. Rapid Comm., 2015, 36, 1799-1805.
20 G. Zhang, Z. A. Lan, X. Wang, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2016, 55
15712-15727.
21 L. Stegbauer, K. Schwinghammer, B. V. Lotsch, Chem. Sci.,
2014, 5, 2789-2793.
22 J. Xie, S. A. Shevlin, Q. Ruan, S. A. Moniz, Y. Liu, X. Liu, Y. Li, C.
C. Lau, Z. X. Guo, J. Tang, Energ. Environ. Sci., 2018, 11, 1617-
1624.
,
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts to declare.
Acknowledgements
23 P. B. Pati, G. Damas, L. Tian, D. L. Fernandes, L. Zhang, I. B.
Pehlivan, T. Edvinsson, C. M. Araujo, H. Tian, Energ. Environ.
Sci., 2017, 10, 1372-1376.
24 R. Asahi, T. Morikawa, T. Ohwaki, K. Aoki, Y. Taga, Science,
2001, 293, 269-271.
25 Y. Yu, W. Yan, X. Wang, P. Li, W. Gao, H. Zou, S. Wu, K. Ding,
Adv. Mater., 2018, 30, 1705060.
26 H. Tong, S. Ouyang, Y. Bi, N. Umezawa, M. Oshikiri, J. Ye, Adv.
Mater., 2012, 24, 229-251.
We are grateful for the funding from National Natural Science
Foundation of China (Grant No. 21604028, 21474033), the
International S&T Cooperation Program of China (Grant No.
2016YFE0124400), and the Program for HUST Interdisciplinary
Innovation Team (Grant No. 2016JCTD104). We thank Dr. Yong
Zhong from Key Laboratory for Special Functional Materials of
the Ministry of Education, Henan University, for his helpful 27 X. Wang, K. Maeda, X. Chen, K. Takanabe, K. Domen, Y. Hou,
X. Fu, M. Antonietti, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2009, 131, 1680-
discussion. We also acknowledge the Analysis and Testing
1681.
Center of Huazhong University of Science and Technology for
28 L. Li, W. Fang, P. Zhang, J. Bi, Y. He, J. Wang, W. Su, J. Mater.
their help in material characterization.
Chem. A, 2016, 4, 12402-12406.
29 Y. Zhang, T. Mori, J. Ye, M. Antonietti, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
2012, 132, 6294-6295.
30 N. Meng, J. Ren, Y. Liu, Y. Huang, T. Petit, B. Zhang, Energ.
Environ. Sci., 2018, 11, 566-571.
31 Y. Xu, N Mao, C. Zhang, X. Wang, J. Zeng, Y. Chena, F. Wang,
J. Jiang, Appl. Catal. B-Environ., 2018, 228, 1-9.
32 Z. A. Lan, Y. Fang, Y. Zhang, X. Wang, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.,
2018, 130, 479-483.
Notes and references
1
X. Chen, S. Shen, L. Guo, S. Mao, Chem. Rev., 2010, 110,
6503-6570.
F. E. Osterloh, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2013, 42, 2294-2320.
2
6 | J. Name., 2012, 00, 1-3
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 20xx
Please do not adjust margins