N. Mitsubayashi et al. / Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology A: Chemistry 219 (2011) 273–277
277
the higher the energy of collisional energy transfer. Energy-transfer
4. Conclusions
quantities from self-collisions of p-xylene are 1.7 times those of
benzene [38].
A series of methyl-substituted benzenes and perfluorobenzenes
were irradiated in the gas phase by an ArF excimer laser. One of
the findings was the formation of xylylene or the elimination of
two hydrogen atoms as a result of a two-photon process of p-
xylene, and the other was the generation of Dewar-type benzene
from HMB as an example of a one-photon process. The isomer-
ization would occur via a conical intersection, and the hot species
would be collisionally relaxed to HMDB and in part to HMB. The
two-photon process, as shown in Scheme 1, can be enhanced
under the condition that the intermediate S0 has a reasonably
high molar extinction coefficient at the laser wavelength; oth-
erwise, a one-photon process will be dominant. The one-photon
process for HMB indicates that the plausible intermediate HMDB**
has an extinction coefficient too low to effectively absorb the
second photon of the laser pulse within the excitation pulse
duration.
3.3. Two-photon process versus one-photon process
If the molar extinction coefficient of the intermediate of a
two-photon process is high enough at the irradiation wavelength,
the two-photon process will be dominantly observed, while a
low molar extinction coefficient of the intermediate will lead to
a one-photon process. In the case of benzene, the two-photon
intermediate S is predicted to have a molar extinction coeffi-
cient of 8300 M cm at a laser wavelength of 193 nm, while the
ground state benzene has a coefficient of 4650 M cm [6]. The
molar extinction coefficients at a high temperature can be evalu-
ated using a modified Sulzer–Wieland model. The Sulzer–Wieland
model was originally developed for explaining the absorption spec-
tra of diatomic molecules at a high temperature, and a modified
version of the model has been useful for polyatomic molecules,
including benzene [7]. These predictions indicate that the ben-
zene system sometimes displays a significant increase in the molar
extinction coefficient during excitation. It is quite reasonable, then,
that a two-photon process occurs. On the other hand, a dominant
one-photon process has been found to occur in the cases of C–H
and C–C dissociations of tetramethylethylene (TME) and C7 olefins
∗∗
∗
−
∗
1
0
−1
−
1
−1
References
[
1] J.K. Foote, M.H. Mallon, J.N. Pitts Jr., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 88 (1966) 3698;
K. Shindo, S. Lipsky, J. Phys. Chem. 45 (1966) 2292;
H.R. Ward, J.S. Wishnok, P.D. Sherman Jr., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 89 (1967) 162.
2] L. Kaplan, K.E. Wilzbach, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 89 (1967) 1030.
3] S.T. Tsai, C.K. Lin, Y.T. Lee, C.K. Ni, J. Chem. Phys. 113 (2000) 67.
[
[
[4] T. Shimada, N. Nakashima, Y. Izawa, C. Yamanaka, J. Phys. Chem. 98 (1993) 9218.
[
[
5] S.T. Tsai, C.L. Huang, Y.T. Lee, C.K. Ni, J. Chem. Phys. 115 (2001) 2449.
6] Y. Honjyo, T. Kinoshita, T. Yatsuhashi, N. Nakashima, J. Photochem. Photobiol.
A 171 (2005) 223.
[
39]. The photochemistry can be explained in terms of dissocia-
∗∗
tion via S produced by internal conversion. TME has a maximum
0
−
1
−1
−1
−1
at
coefficient of 14,400 M cm
at 187 nm and 9250 M cm
[7] N. Nakashima, K. Yoshihara, J. Chem. Phys. 79 (1983) 2727.
[8] N. Ikeda, N. Nakashima, K. Yoshihara, J. Chem. Phys. 82 (1985) 5285.
∗
∗
1
93 nm. In the case of the TME S the coefficient would be
0
[
9] N. Nakashima, N. Ikeda, K. Yoshihara, J. Phys. Chem. 92 (1988) 4389.
10] U. Brand, H. Hippler, H. Lindemann, J. Troe, J. Phys. Chem. 94 (1990) 6305.
[11] K. Luther, J. Troe, K.M. Weitzel, J. Phys. Chem. 94 (1990) 6316.
greatly reduced based on the modified Sulzer–Wieland model for
an absorption spectrum at high temperature, and as a result, a
one-photon process would be dominant. Prediction of the change
in the molar extinction coefficients is an indispensable require-
ment when judging whether two-photon or one-photon processes
occur.
On the basis of the above requirement, a two-photon pro-
cess would occur in the laser photolysis for systems of toluene
and hexafluorobenzene, while a one-photon process would be
expected for HMB and durene based on the VUV spectra [34,40].
[
[
[
[
12] H. Hippler, C. Riehn, J. Troe, K.M. Weitzel, J. Phys. Chem. 94 (1990) 6321.
13] N. Nakashima, K. Yoshihara, J. Phys. Chem. 93 (1989) 7763.
14] T. Yatsuhashi, N. Nakashima, Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 74 (2001) 579.
[15] G.W. Johnston, J. Park, S. Satyapal, N. Shafer, K. Tsukiyama, R. Bersohn, Acc.
Chem. Res. 23 (1990) 232.
[
[
16] C.K. Ni, Y.T. Lee, Int. Rev. Phys. Chem. 23 (2004) 187.
17] C.M. Tseng, Y.A. Dyakov, H.C. Huang, K.Y. Huang, Y.T. Lee, C.K. Ni, S.Y. Chiang, J.
Chem. Phys. 133 (2010) 074307.
[18] C.Z. Bisgaard, H. Satzger, S. Ullrich, A. Stolow, ChemPhysChem 10 (2009) 101.
[
19] C.K. Lin, C.L. Huang, J.C. Jiang, A.H.H. Chang, Y.T. Lee, S.H. Lin, C.K. Ni, J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 124 (2002) 4068.
−
1
−1
The molar extinction coefficient of toluene is 4900 M cm
at
93 nm, while that of the hot toluene S produced after internal
[
20] C.L. Huang, J.C. Jiang, Y.T. Lee, C.K. Ni, J. Chem. Phys. 117 (2002) 7074.
∗
∗
1
[21] T. Shimada, Y. Ojima, N. Nakashima, Y. Izawa, C. Yamanaka, J. Phys. Chem. 96
(1992) 6298.
0
−
1
−1
conversion is predicted to be 20,000 M cm ; in fact, two-
photon benzyl radical formation has been observed for the toluene
system [9]. For HFB, an increase in the molar extinction coef-
ficient at 193 nm and a two-photon process are expected from
the results of the laser photolysis of HFB [41]. The molar extinc-
[
[
22] J. Park, R. Bersohn, I. Oref, J. Chem. Phys. 93 (1990) 5700.
23] S. Lange, K. Luther, T. Rech, A.M. Schmoltner, J. Troe, J. Phys. Chem. 98 (1994)
6509.
[
[
[
24] C.L. Huang, J.C. Jiang, Y.T. Lee, C.K. Ni, J. Phys. Chem. A 107 (2003) 4019.
25] R. Fröchtenight, J.P. Toennies, J. Photochem. Photobiol. A 80 (1994) 67.
26] T. Yatsuhashi, S. Touma, N. Nakashima, J. Phys. Chem. A 109 (2005) 6847.
−
1
−1
tion coefficient of HMB is 60,000 M cm
at 193 nm for the
[27] Y. Hosoi, T. Yatsuhashi, K. Ohtakeyama, S. Shimizu, Y. Sakata, N. Nakashima, J.
Phys. Chem. A 106 (2002) 2014.
1
∗∗
E1u transition [34], while that of the HMB** (= S ) is predicted
0
[
[
28] T. Yatsuhashi, T. Akiho, N. Nakashima, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 123 (2001) 10137.
29] I.J. Palmer, I.N. Ragazos, F. Bernardi, M. Olivucci, M.A. Robb, J. Am. Chem. Soc.
115 (1993) 673.
to be considerably lower on the basis of the Sulzer–Wieland
model. If the hot species is hot HMDB (HMDB**), according
to Scheme 2, the original V ← N transition should be lower in
the hot state at 193 nm. The absorption peak of HMDB is not
clear, but would be shorter than 201 nm, and the molar extinc-
[30] H.R. Ward, J.S. Wishnok, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 90 (1968) 1085.
[
31] I. Haller, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 88 (1966) 2070;
G. Camaggi, F. Gozzo, G. Cevidalli, Chem. Commun. (1966) 313.
32] E.M. Arnett, J.M. Bollinger, Tetrahedron Lett. (1964) 3803.
[
−1
−1
tion coefficient is only 2800 M cm at room temperature at
this wavelength [42]. The absorption spectrum will be broad-
ened and the molar extinction coefficient of HMDB** will be
well lowered. Neither S nor HMDB** would have molar extinc-
tion coefficients substantially lower than that of 60,000 M cm
for HMB. The one-photon process of HMB at 193 nm is accept-
able. It is not easy to predict whether the one- or two-photon
process is dominant for p-xylene; the results showed the two-
photon process, and the one-photon process is a likely mechanism
for mesitylene; however, the two-photon process was seen
at a particular wavelength of 235 nm in the laser intensity
dependence.
[33] D.M. Lemal, J.V. Staros, V. Austel, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 91 (1969) 3373;
M.G. Barlow, R.N. Haszeldine, R. Hubbard, Chem. Commun. (1969) 202.
[
34] A. Bolovinos, J. Philis, E. Pantos, P. Tsekeris, G. Andritsopoulos, J. Mol. Spectrosc.
4 (1982) 55.
9
∗
∗
[35] W. Radloff, T. Freudenberg, H.H. Ritze, V. Stert, F. Noack, I.V. Hertel, Chem. Phys.
Lett. 261 (1966) 301.
0
−
1
−1
[
[
36] R.X. Fernandes, A. Gebert, H. Hippler, Proc. Combust. Inst. 29 (2002) 1337.
[
[
39] N. Nakashima, N. Ikeda, N. Shimo, K. Yoshihara, J. Chem. Phys. 87 (1987) 3471.
40] J. Philis, A. Bolovinos, G. Andritsopoulos, E. Pantos, P. Tsekeris, J. Phys. B At. Mol.
Opt. Phys. 14 (1981) 3621.
[41] T. Ichimura, Y. Mori, N. Nakashima, K. Yoshihara, J. Chem. Phys. 83 (1985)
17.
1
[