Job/Unit: I42778
/KAP1
Date: 10-11-14 16:28:16
Pages: 8
FULL PAPER
ing copolymer can serve as a convenient model system for
the design of new metallopolymers and their further chemi-
cal, biological, and environmental applications.
Acknowledgments
The mechanistic studies of oxidation chemistry were partially sup-
ported by the National Science Foundation (NSF), USA (grant
number CHE-0718625).
Experimental Section
[1] a) K. Bielanski, J. Haber, Oxygen in Catalysis, Marcel Dekker,
New York, 1991; b) R. P. Viswanath, Catalysis 2002, 227–237.
[2] I. Bertini, H. B. Gray, S. J. Lippard, J. S. Valentine (Eds.),
Bioinorganic Chemistry, University Science Books, Sausalito,
1994.
[3] K. D. Karlin, A. D. Zuberbühler, in: Bioinorganic Catalysis,
2nd ed. (Eds.: J. Reedijk, E. Bouman), Marcel Dekker, New
York, 1999, p. 469–534.
[4] a) E. A. Lewis, W. B. Tolman, Chem. Rev. 2004, 104, 1047–
1076; b) N. Kitajima, Y. Moro-oka, Chem. Rev. 1994, 94, 737–
757; c) H. Gampp, A. D. Zuberbühler, Met. Ions Biol. Syst.
1981, 12, 133–189.
[5] E. I. Solomon, U. M. Sundaram, T. E. Machonkin, Chem. Rev.
1996, 96, 2563–2605.
[6] J. Pawelek, A. K. Chakraborty, in: The Pigmentary System
(Eds.: J. J. Nordlundm, R. Boissy, V. Hearing, R. King, J. P.
Ortonne), University Press, Oxford, UK, 1998.
[7] Y. C. Lee, J. R. Witaker (Eds.), Enzymatic Browning and Its
Prevention, ACS, Washington DC, 1995.
[8] a) S. W. May, Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 1999, 10, 370–375; b) N.
Durán, M. A. Rosa, A. D’Annibale, L. Gianfreda, Enz.
Microb. Technol. 2002, 31, 907–931.
General: The copolymer P1 with a repeating unit (RU) of (4-vinyl-
pyridine)3(acrylamide)1 was prepared according to published pro-
cedures.[18] The CuII-P1 complex was prepared by mixing CuII with
the polymer in a 1:1 ratio of CuII/RU and was previously charac-
terized by electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) and electronic
spectroscopy.[18,20] The hydroxylation/oxidation of phenol and
derivatives to yield o-quinone and derivatives was performed in
0.1 m 4-(2-hydroxyethyl)-1-piperazineethanesulfonic acid buffered
(HEPES-buffered) methanol solution (50%) at pH 8.0 and 25 °C
in the presence of the o-quinone trapper MBTH, which forms an
adduct with o-quinone to give an intense red color at λ = 500 nm
(3.25ϫ104 m–1 cm–1).[39] The rate in absmin–1 for the production of
the final o-quinone in a 1 cm cuvette was monitored with a Varian
Cary50 spectrophotometer with a temperature control unit and
converted to mmmin–1. The mechanistic Job plot (Figure 5) was
based on the classic optical Job plot, wherein the rate of reaction
instead of the optical density was monitored as a function of the
mol fraction of CuII-P1 (XCu–P1) with a constant total concentra-
tion of [Cu-P1] + [S].
The kinetics can be described as the binding of the phenol substrate
(S) to the metal center to form an intermediate (Cu-P1)–S complex,
followed by the conversion of the bound substrate into products
[Equation (1)]. The rate law for this reaction mechanism can be
expressed as Equation (2), wherein KЈ = (k–1 + kcat)/k1 or k–1/k1 +
kcat/k1 is the apparent dissociation constant of the ternary (CuII-
P1)–S complex and is similar to the Michaelis constant in enzyme
kinetics, assuming that the concentration of the ternary complex is
much lower than that of unbound substrate.
[9] M. A. Kopf, K. D. Karlin, in: Biomimetic Oxidations (Ed.: B.
Meunier), Imperial College Press, London, 2000, chapter 7.
[10] J. P. Klinman, Chem. Rev. 1996, 96, 2541–2561.
[11] R. Andreozzi, V. Caprio, A. Insola, R. Marotta, Catal. Today
1999, 53, 51–59.
[12] E. R. Stadtman, Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2000, 928, 22–38.
[13] K. S. Kasprzak, Free Radical Biol. Med. 2002, 32, 958–967.
[14] W. Lutz, W. Wasowicz, Comments Toxicol. 2003, 9, 59–83.
[15] a) M. Jaiswal, R. Menon, Polym. Int. 2006, 55, 1371–1384; b)
A. L. Stepanov, R. I. Khaibullin, Rev. Adv. Mater. Sci. 2004, 7,
108–125.
[16] J. Suh, Acc. Chem. Res. 2003, 36, 562–570.
[17] S. J. Koch, C. Renner, X. Xie, T. Schrader, Angew. Chem. Int.
Ed. 2006, 45, 6352–6355; Angew. Chem. 2006, 118, 6500.
[18] A. I. Hanafy, V. Lykourinou-Tibbs, K. S. Bisht, L.-J. Ming, In-
org. Chim. Acta 2005, 358, 1247–1252.
(1)
[19] V. Lykourinou, A. I. Hanafy, A. Angerhofer, K. S. Bisht, L.-J.
Ming, Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2009, 1199–1207.
[20] V. Lykourinou, A. I. Hanafy, G. F. Z. da Silva, K. S. Bisht,
R. W. Larsen, B. T. Livingston, A. Angerhofer, L.-J. Ming, Eur.
J. Inorg. Chem. 2008, 2584–2592.
(2)
[21] G. F. Z. da Silva, L.-J. Ming, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2005, 44,
5501–5504; Angew. Chem. 2005, 117, 5637.
For a bisubstrate random-binding mechanism, the binding of two
substrates A and B to the active center (CuII-P1) can be described
by Equations (3) and (4).[29] The constants KA and KB are the ap-
parent dissociation constants for the dissociation of A and B,
respectively, from the ternary complex (CuII-P1)(A)(B), and KiA
and KB are the intrinsic dissociation constants for the complexes
(CuII-P1)–A and (CuII-P1)–B.
[22] a) K.-Q. Ling, Y. Lee, D. Macikenas, J. D. Protasiewicz, L. M.
Sayre, J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 1358–1366; b) S. R. Starck, J.-
Z. Deng, S. M. Hecht, Biochemistry 2000, 39, 2413–2419.
[23] D. T. Y. Yiu, M. F. W. Lee, W. W. Y. Lam, T.-C. Lau, Inorg.
Chem. 2003, 42, 1225–1232.
[24] M. R. Maurya, I. Jain, S. J. J. Titinchi, Appl. Catal. A 2003,
249, 139–149.
[25] J. N. Mugo, S. F. Mapolie, J. L. van Wyk, Inorg. Chim. Acta
2010, 363, 2643–2651.
[26] J.-M. Tatibouët, E. Guélou, J. Fournier, Top. Catal. 2005, 33,
225–232.
[27] K. K. Bania, R. C. Deka, J. Phys. Chem. C 2013, 117, 11663–
(3)
11678.
[28] M. A. Gilabert, A. N. P. Hiner, P. A. García-Ruiz, J. Tudela, F.
García-Molina, M. Acosta, F. García-Cánovas, J. N. Rodríg-
uez-López, Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2004, 1699, 235–243.
[29] V. Leskovac, Comprehensive Enzyme Kinetics, Kluwer/Plenum,
Boston, 2002, p. 119.
(4)
Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 0000, 0–0
6
© 0000 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim