ULTRASOUND ACCELERATES RAT FEMORAL FRACTURE REPAIR
679
trasound at 50 mW/cm2 and at higher intensities in-
duced a real-time increase in the intracellular level of
calcium. And other investigators showed that exposure
of cultured chondrocytes to LIPUS stimulated an up-
regulation of aggrecan gene expression.(39,40)
7. Wang S-J, Lewallen DG, Bolander ME, Chao EYS, Ilstrup
DM, Greenleaf JF 1994 Low intensity ultrasound treatment
increases strength in a rat femoral fracture model. J Orthop Res
12:40–47.
8. Heckman JD, Ryaby JP, McCabe J, Frey JJ, Kilcoyne RF 1994
Acceleration of tibial fracture-healing by non-invasive, low-
intensity pulsed ultrasound. J Bone Joint Surg Am 76:26–34.
9. Kristiansen TK, Ryaby JP, McCabe J, Frey JJ, Roe LR 1997
Accelerated healing of distal radial fractures with the use of
specific, low-intensity ultrasound. A multicenter, prospective,
randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. J Bone
Joint Surg Am 79:961–973.
10. Binderman I, Zor U, Kaye AM, Shimshoni Z, Harell A,
Somjen D 1988 The transduction of mechanical force into
biochemical events in bone cells may involve activation of
phospholipase A2. Calcif Tissue Int 42:261–266.
11. Buckley MJ, Banes AJ, Levin LG, Sumpio BE, Sato M, Jordan
R, Gilbert J, Link GW, Tran Son Tay R 1988 Osteoblasts
increase their rate of division and align in response to cyclic,
mechanical tension in vitro. Bone Miner 4:225–236.
12. Rubin J, Biskobing D, Fan X, Rubin C, McLeod K, Taylor WR
1997 Pressure regulates osteoclast formation and MCSF ex-
pression in marrow culture. J Cell Physiol 170:81–87.
13. Bolander ME 1992 Regulation of fracture repair by growth
factors. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 200:165–170.
(5) Endochondral ossification. Invasion of newly formed
blood vessels into the cartilage tissue, degradation of
cartilage tissue, and bone formation are involved in
endochondral ossification. The growth, differentiation
and activity of the cells such as chondrocytes, osteo-
blasts, endothelial cells, and chondroclasts/osteoclasts
related to those reactions may be important in this
process. In a previous study, we showed that the num-
ber of multinuclear cells (MNCs) near the boundary
between cartilage tissue and trabecular bone in the
LIPUS-treated femur (15 Ϯ 3 MNCs/mm) was greater
in comparison with that in the control femur (8 Ϯ 2
MNCs/mm) on day 21 after the fracture (in prepara-
tion). However, it is unclear whether this effect was
based on the direct action of LIPUS on osteoclastogen-
esis. Soma et al. showed that the application of bilateral
stretch stress to osteoblastic cells stimulated the produc-
tion of some factors that could up-regulate osteoclasto- 14. Schwachtgen JL, Houston P, Campbell C, Sukhatme V, Brad-
genesis.(41)
dock M 1998 Fluid shear stress activation of egr-1 transcrip-
tion in cultured human endothelial and epithelial cells is me-
(6) Bone remodeling. Tanzer et al. reported that LIPUS
diated via the extracellular signal-related kinase 1/2 mitogen-
stimulated bone ingrowth into porous coated dog fem-
activated protein kinase pathway. J Clin Invest 101:2540–
oral implants.(42) In contrast, Spadaro et al. reported that
2549.
physeal bone growth was far less sensitive to LIPUS
15. MacKenna DA, Dolfi F, Vuori K, Ruoslahti E 1998 Extracel-
than was fracture repair.(43) It remains unclear whether
lular signal-regulated kinase and c-Jun NH2-terminal kinase
and/or how LIPUS directly modulates bone metabolism
involved in bone formation and bone resorption.
activation by mechanical stretch is integrin-dependent and
matrix-specific in rat cardiac fibroblasts. J Clin Invest 101:
301–310.
In conclusion, we investigated whether the accelerating
effects of LIPUS on the healing of rat femoral fractures
depended on the duration and timing of LIPUS treatment to
determine the target reaction of LIPUS in the fracture heal-
ing process. Although we could not define the main target,
we found out that LIPUS accelerated the rat femoral frac-
ture healing regardless of the timing of LIPUS treatment.
Thus, LIPUS appears to act on various cellular reactions
involved in the fracture healing process.
16. Pavalko FM, Chen NX, Turner CH, Burr DB, Atkinson S,
Hsieh YF, Qiu J, Duncan RL 1998 Fluid shear-induced me-
chanical signaling in MC3T3–E1 osteoblasts requires
cytoskeleton-integrin interactions. Am J Physiol 275:C1591–
C1601.
17. Quinn TM, Grodzinsky AJ, Buschmann MD, Kim YJ, Hun-
ziker EB 1998 Mechanical compression alters proteoglycan
deposition and matrix deformation around individual cells in
cartilage explants. J Cell Sci 111:573–583.
18. Ajubi NE, Klein-Nulend J, Alblas MJ, Burger EH, Nijweide
PJ 1999 Signal transduction pathways involved in fluid flow-
induced PGE2 production by cultured osteocytes. Am J
Physiol 276:E171–E178.
REFERENCES
19. Einhorn TA 1998 The cell and molecular biology of fracture
healing. Clin Orthop 55(Suppl 3):S7–S21.
20. Jingushi S, Joyce ME, Bolander ME 1992 Genetic expression
of extracellular matrix proteins correlates with histologic
changes during fracture repair. J Bone Miner Res 7:1045–
1055.
21. Bonnarens F, Einhorn TA 1984 Production of a standard
closed fracture in laboratory animal bone. J Orthop Res 2:97–
101.
22. White AA III, Panjabi MM, Southwick WO 1977 The four
biomechanical stages of fracture repair. J Bone Joint Surg Am
59:188–192.
1. Ziskin MC 1987 Application of ultrasound in medicine—
comparison with other modalities. In: Rapacholi MH, Gran-
dolfo M, Rindi A (eds.) Ultrasound: Medical Applications,
Biological Effects, and Hazard Potential. Plenum Press, New
York, NY, USA, pp. 49–59.
2. Wells PNT 1985 Surgical applications of ultrasound. In: Ny-
borg WL, Ziskin MC (eds.) Biological Effects of Ultrasound.
Churchill Livingstone, New York, NY, USA, pp. 157–167.
3. Xavier CAM, Duarte LR 1983 Estimulaci ultra-sonica de callo
osseo: Applicaca clinica. Rev Bras Orthop 18:73–80.
4. Duarte LR 1983 The stimulation of bone growth by ultra-
sound. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 101:153–159.
23. Black J, Perdigon P, Brown N, Pollack SR 1984 Stiffness and
strength of fracture callus. Relative rates of mechanical mat-
uration as evaluated by a uniaxial tensile test. Clin Orthop
182:278–288.
24. Markel MD, Wikenheiser MA, Chao EY 1990 A study of
fracture callus material properties: Relationship to the tor-
sional strength of bone. J Orthop Res 8:843–850.
5. Klug W, Franke WG, Knoch HG 1986 Scintigraphic control of
bone-fracture healing under ultrasonic stimulation: An animal
experimental study. Eur J Nucl Med 11:494–497.
6. Pilla AA, Mont MA, Nasser PR, Khan SA, Figueiredo M,
Kaufman JJ, Siffert RS 1990 Non-invasive low-intensity
pulsed ultrasound accelerates bone healing in the rabbit. J Or-
thop Trauma 4:246–253.