10.1002/chem.202000134
Chemistry - A European Journal
FULL PAPER
phosphate, 300 m
M
NaCl), amended with 20 m
M
imidazole, homogenized
evaporated under reduced pressure. For chromatographic purification of
1, the residue was dissolved in H2O:acetonitrile (ACN, 9:1, v/v) with 0.1%
trifluoroacetic acid (TFA), which yielded 893 mg (88.5%) of pure 1.
at 850 bar in a high-pressure Gaulin flow homogenizer which was rinsed
with another 1 L of lysis buffer, centrifuged at 14,000 g for 45 min at 4°C
and finally filtered (0.45 µm). PsiK was further purified by immobilized
metal affinity chromatography on
a FPLC system (ÄktaPilot, GE
Preparative liquid chromatography: 1 was purified on an Agilent 1260
series instrument, equipped with a Zorbax Eclipse XDB C18 column (250 ×
21.2 mm, 10 µm). Solvent A was 0.1% TFA in H2O, solvent B was ACN. A
linear gradient 5-100% B within 20 min at a flow of 20 mL min-1 was applied.
Further workup included solvent/antisolvent precipitation in 20 mL acidic
(pH 4) H2O and 30 mL acetone. The precipitate was washed with cold
acetone. To verify purity, 1H and 13C NMR spectra of purified 1, dissolved
in D2O, were recorded at 500 and 125 MHz, respectively, and 300 K on a
Bruker Avance III spectrometer. Chemical shifts were referenced to
residual non-deuterated solvent (δH 4.80 ppm).
Healthcare), equipped with a FineLINE Pilot 35 column filled with 200 mL
Ni-Sepharose FF. The flow rate was 20 mL min-1. The system was
equilibrated in lysis buffer before 6 L of supernatant were loaded. The
column was washed step-wise with a gradient of 30 m
volumes), 40 m (1 cv), and 50 m imidazole (2 cv), using the same buffer.
The final elution was conducted with 500 m imidazole, resulting in a
200 mL fraction. The eluted enzyme was rebuffered on a Amicon Ultra 15
centrifugal filter unit (Merck), equilibrated with phosphate buffer (50 m
M (2 column
M
M
M
M
,
pH 7.0), and stored at -80°C with 10% glycerol until used for production of
1. The protein concentration was determined using Bradford’s method.[16]
The total yield was 150.2 mg pure PsiK. Prior to use for assays, PsiK was
rebuffered by FPLC (below).
Acknowledgements
Size-exclusion chromatography: FPLC (Äkta Pure 25, GE Healthcare)
fitted to a Superdex 200 increase 10/300 GL column with 24 mL bed
volume was used i) to determine if PsiK was active as a mono- or multimer,
and ii) to rebuffer PsiK. Prior to sample loading, PsiK was concentrated on
a centrifugal filter unit (10 kDa cut off, Amicon Ultra 15, Merck). Elution
was with phosphate buffer (10 mM sodium dihydrogen phosphate, 140 mM
NaCl, pH 7.5) at a flow of 0.5 mL min-1. For rebuffering and subsequent
use in assays, PsiK was eluted with assay buffer (below).
We thank Karin Burmeister, Karsten Willing, Andrea Perner and
Heike Heinecke (Hans-Knöll-Institute Jena) for technical
assistance, and for recording high-resolution mass and NMR
spectra, respectively. C.L. acknowledges a doctoral fellowship by
the International Leibniz Research School (ILRS) for Microbial
Interactions. This work was supported by the Deutsche
Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG grant HO2515/7-1 to D.H.) and
by the Usona Institute (Madison, WI). D.H. is also supported by
the DFG Collaborative Research Center ChemBioSys 1127.
In vitro PsiK assays: Assays to detect activity or to record kinetics were
set up in sodium dihydrogen phosphate buffer (50 m
β-mercaptoethanol in a final volume of 50 µL. ATP and MgCl2 or chlorides
of other bivalent cations (2 m each) and either 4-hydroxytryptamine or 2
(1 m ) were added as substrate, PsiK was added at 1 µ . The reactions
M, pH 7.0) and 3 mM
M
Keywords: biosynthesis • enzymes • fermentation • kinase •
M
M
psilocybin
were incubated for 10 min at 40°C. Subsequently, the assays were
lyophilized, the residue was dissolved in 50 µL MeOH, centrifuged (11,000
g, 10 min, 4°C), filtered, and chromatographically analyzed (below). To
determine optima, pH and temperature were varied between pH 6-8 and
20-50°C. To investigate the storability of PsiK, aliquots were stored with or
without additional glycerol (10%, v/v) at 4, -20 and -80°C and analyzed by
the above assay after 14 and 30 days.
[1]
[2]
a) A. Hofmann, R. Heim, A. Brack, H. Kobel, Experientia 1958, 14, 107–
109; b) A. Hofmann, R. Heim, A. Brack, H. Kobel, A. Frey, H. Ott, T.
Petrzilka, F. Troxler, Helv. Chim. Acta 1959, 42, 1557–1572.
H. A. Geiger, M. G. Wurst, R. N. Daniels, ACS Chem. Neurosci. 2018, 9,
2438−2447.
[3]
[4]
[5]
F. X. Vollenweider, M. Kometer, Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2010, 11, 642–651.
M. W. Johnson, R. R. Griffiths, Neurotherapeutics 2017, 14, 734–740.
a) D. E. Nichols, S. Frescas, Synthesis 1999, 6, 935–938; b) O. Shirota,
W. Hakamata, Y. Goda, J. Nat. Prod. 2003, 66, 885–887, c) S. Bartolucci,
M. Mari, G. Di Gregorio, G. Piersanti, Tetrahedron 2016, 72, 2233–2238;
d) H. Sakagami, K. Ogasawara, Heterocycles 1999, 51, 1131–1135; e)
C. Hu, H. Qin, Y. Cui, Y. Jia, Tetrahedron 2009, 65, 9075–9080; f) N.
Gathergood, P.J. Scammells, Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 921–923.
A. M. Sherwood, P. Meisenheimer, G. Tarpley, R. B. Kargbo, Synthesis,
2020, 52, 688-694,
Analytical liquid chromatography: UHPLC-ESIMS-analyses of in vitro
assays were performed on an Agilent Infinity 1290 chromatograph with a
Luna Omega Polar C18 column (100 × 2.1 mm, 1.6 µm particle size,
Phenomenex), and coupled to an Agilent 6130 Single Quadrupole mass
detector. The flow was 0.5 mL min-1. Diode array detection was between
λ=200-600 nm. Chromatograms were extracted at λ=280 nm. Solvent A
was 0.1% (v/v) formic acid in H2O, solvent B was acetonitrile (ACN). The
linear gradient was initially 1% B, increased to 10% within 3 min, and to
100% B in 1 min. LC-HRESIMS analysis in positive and negative mode
[6]
[7]
a) J. Fricke, F. Blei, D. Hoffmeister, Angew. Chem. Intl. Ed. 2017, 56,
12352–12355; Angew. Chem. 2017, 129, 12524–12527; b) H.T.
Reynolds, V. Vijayakumar, E. Gluck-Thaler, H. B. Korotkin, P. B.
Matheny, J. C. Slot, Evol. Lett. 2018, 2, 88–101.
with purified substances were performed on
a Thermo Accela
chromatograph coupled to an Exactive Orbitrap mass spectrometer, as
described.[14]
[8]
a) S. Hoefgen, J. Lin, J. Fricke, M. Stroe, D. J. Mattern, J. E. Kufs, P.
Hortschansky, A. A. Brakhage, D. Hoffmeister, V. Valiante, Metab. Eng.
2018, 48, 44–51; b) A. M. Adams, N. A. Kaplan, Z. Wei, J. D. Brinton, C.
S. Monnier, A. L. Enacopol, T. A. Ramelot, J. A. Jones, Metab. Eng. 2019,
56,111-119.
Gram-scale production of 1: Scaled-up production was carried out in a
1.8 L reaction in sodium dihydrogen phosphate buffer (50 m
Before adding enzyme and substrates, the reaction buffer was pre-
warmed to 40°C. Subsequently, 725 mg 2 (2 m ), 3.97 g ATP disodium
salt (4 m ), 1.46 g MgCl2 ꞏ 6 H2O (4 m ) and 422 mg β-mercaptoethanol
(3 m ) were added. The reaction was initiated by adding 149.7 mg of
M, pH 7.0).
M
M
M
[9]
C. Lenz, J. Wick, D. Braga, M. García-Altares, G. Lackner, C. Hertweck,
M. Gressler, D. Hoffmeister, Angew. Chem. Intl. Ed. 2020, 59, 1450-1454.
M
purified PsiK (1.89 µM). Samples (50 µL) were taken in triplicates in 10 min
intervals to monitor product formation by UHPLC-MS. After 90 min, the
solvent was evaporated under reduced pressure, and the residue was
dissolved in 500 mL MeOH, centrifuged (3,200 g, 15 min, 4°C) also to
remove precipitated protein and ADP, and filtered. The solvent was
[10] S.-Y. Ku, K. A. Cornell, P. L. Howell, BMC Struct. Biol. 2007, 7, 70.
[11] a) C. M. Porter, B. G. Miller, Bioorg. Chem. 2012, 43, 44–50, b) D.
Pollard-Knight, A. Cornish-Bowden, Mol. Cell. Biochem. 1982, 44, 71–
80.
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.