Evaluation Only. Created with Aspose.PDF. Copyright 2002-2021 Aspose Pty Ltd.
J. Fan et al. / Dyes and Pigments 99 (2013) 620e626
621
with a single excitation wavelength. Given this molecular design,
click chemistry provides a convenient synthetic method for unit-
ing the two fluorophores, and the resultant 1,2,3-triazole was
identified as an ideal bridge and biocompatibility [20,21]. Then, a
Hþ-induced process can change the emission maximum of the
system from 538 nm (the characteristic peak of naphthalimide) to
580 nm (the characteristic peak of rhodamine). This wavelength
shift allows the ratiometric detection of pH both in aqueous so-
lution and live cells.
2.2.4. Synthesis of 2
Compound 4 (100 mg, 0.27 mmol) and NaN3 (87.75 mg,
1.35 mmol) were added to 20 mL ethanol. After heating at 110 ꢀC for
24 h, the solvent was removed on a rotary evaporator. The resulting
crude product was purified on a silica gel column with CH2Cl2/ethyl
acetate as eluent to give compound 2 (54.08 mg, yield: 59.4%). 1H
NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3), dH (ppm): 8.56 (m, 1H), 8.44 (d, 1H,
J ¼ 8.0 Hz), 8.08 (t, 1H, J ¼ 4.0 Hz), 7.59 (m, 1H), 6.69 (d, 1H,
J ¼ 4.0 Hz), 5.36 (s, 1H), 4.42 (t, 2H, J ¼ 8.0 Hz), 3.64 (t, 2H,
J ¼ 8.0 Hz), 3.40 (m, 2H), 1.80 (m, 2H), 1.55 (m, 2H), 1.02 (t, 3H,
J ¼ 8.0 Hz), Q-TOFMS: [M ꢁ H]þ: 336.1465; found: 336.1526.
2. Experimental section
2.1. Apparatus and general methods
2.2.5. Synthesis of 1
Rhodamine hydrazide 3 was synthesized from rhodamine B by
the procedure published in literature [24]. Compound 3 (300.0 mg,
0.66 mmol), K2CO3 (96.6 mg, 0.7 mmol) was dissolved in 20 mL
ethyl acetate in a 50 mL flask, excess (1.0 mL) 3-bromopropyne was
then added dropwise with vigorous stirring. The mixture was
refluxed overnight. After removal of ethyl acetate under vacuum,
the residue was purified by flash chromatography with CH2Cl2/
ethyl acetate as eluent to give compound 1 as a white powder
(100 mg, yield: 30.6%). TLC analysis: Rf ¼ 0.6 in 5.0% ethyl acetate in
CH2Cl2. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3), dH (ppm): 7.93 (t, 1H, J ¼ 4.0 Hz),
7.47 (m, 2H), 7.11 (d, 1H, J ¼ 4.0 Hz), 6.48 (d, 2H, J ¼ 8.0 Hz), 6.41 (s,
2H), 6.28 (d, 2H, J ¼ 4.0 Hz), 4.58 (t, 1H, J ¼ 8.0 Hz), 3.33 (q, 8H), 3.32
(d, 2H, J ¼ 4.0 Hz), 2.10 (s, 1H), 1.16 (t, 12H, J ¼ 8.0 Hz). 13C NMR
(100 MHz, CDCl3), dC: 166.79, 153.81, 151.90, 148.95, 132.90, 129.98,
128.44, 127.38, 124.11, 122.99, 107.97, 105.72, 98.11, 80.21, 72.54,
65.49, 44.47, 40.55, 12.76. Q-TOFMS: [M þ H]þ: 495.2760; found:
495.2760.
All solvents used were of analytical grade without further pu-
rification. 1H NMR and 13C NMR spectra were recorded on a VAR-
IAN INOVA-400 spectrometer, using TMS as an internal standard.
Mass spectrometry data were obtained with a HP1100LC/MSD
mass spectrometer and a LC/Q-TOF MS spectrometer. UVevisible
spectra were collected on a Perkin Elmer Lambda 35 UVeVis
spectrophotometer. Fluorescence measurements were performed
on a VAEIAN CARY Eclipse Fluorescence Spectrophotometer with a
slit width of 5 nm for excitation and 2.5 nm for emission, respec-
tively. All pH measurements were made with a Model PHS-3C
meter (SHANGHAI PRECISION & SCIENTIFIC INSTRUMENT CO.,
LTD). The fluorescence images of cells for the staining experiments
were performed with an Olympus FV1000 confocal laser scanning
microscope.
2.2. Synthetic routes of NR1
2.2.1. Synthesis of 6
2.2.6. Synthesis of NR1
According to the literature [22], compound 6 was synthesized by
refluxing compound 7 and ethanolamine for 4 h in ethanol. After
filtration, the crude product was recrystallized from ethanol as a
white product with a yield of 70.3%. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3), dH
(ppm): 8.68 (d, 1H, J ¼ 8.0 Hz), 8.60 (d, 1H, J ¼ 8.0 Hz), 8.44 (d, 1H,
J ¼ 4.0 Hz), 8.06 (d, 1H, J ¼ 8.0 Hz), 7.87 (t, 1H, J ¼ 8.0), 4.46 (t, 2H,
J ¼ 4.0 Hz), 3.99 (t, 2H, J ¼ 4.0 Hz). Q-TOFMS: [M þ H]þ: 320.1432,
found: 320.1430.
Compound 2 (42 mg, 0.124 mmol) and compound 1 (61.29 mg,
0.124 mmol) were added to 10 mL DMF. After CuSO4$5H2O and
sodium ascorbate (Sodium AC) were added to the solution, the
mixture was stirred under N2 at room temperature for 12 h. Excess
water was added to the mixture, which was extracted with CH2Cl2
and dried over magnesium sulfate. After removal of solvent under
vacuum, the residue was purified on a silica gel column with
CH2Cl2/ethyl acetate as eluant to give NR1 (74 mg, yield: 72.0%). 1H
NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3), dH (ppm): 8.48 (d, 1H, J ¼ 4.0 Hz), 8.39 (d,
1H, J ¼ 8.0 Hz), 8.15 (d, 1H, J ¼ 16.0 Hz), 7.99 (d, 1H, J ¼ 14.0 Hz), 7.52
(t,1H, J ¼ 8.0 Hz), 7.44 (t, 2H, J ¼ 8.0 Hz), 7.08 (d, 1H, J ¼ 8.0 Hz), 6.68
(d, 2H, J ¼ 8.0 Hz), 6.59 (d, 2H, J ¼ 4.0 Hz), 6.43 (s, 2H), 5.60 (s, 1H),
5.34 (s, 1H), 4.61 (d, 2H, J ¼ 4.0 Hz), 4.54 (d, 2H, J ¼ 8.0 Hz), 3.35 (q,
8H), 2.22 (t, 2H, J ¼ 8.0 Hz), 1.77 (t, 3H, J ¼ 8.0 Hz), 1.54 (q, 2H), 1.16
(t, 12H, J ¼ 8.0 Hz). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3), dC: 175.60, 165.53,
164.45, 163.67, 152.57, 150.04, 149.05, 145.49, 134.93, 133.69, 131.46,
130.01, 129.90, 129.75, 128.84, 128.16, 127.37, 126.61, 124.56, 123.47,
122.25, 120.16, 109.10, 108.10, 104.95, 104.27, 98.41, 71.82, 65.53,
47.92, 44.34, 43.40, 39.30, 35.93, 31.92, 30.91, 29.70, 29.53, 29.34,
29.24, 29.13, 27.22, 25.54, 22.70, 20.35, 19.17, 14.14, 13.87, 12.63.
Q-TOFMS: [M þ H]þ: 830.4148; found: 830.4152.
2.2.2. Synthesis of 5
n-Butylamine (146.3 mg, 2 mmol) was added to compound 6
(160 mg, 0.5 mmol) in acetonitrile (30 mL), and the mixture
refluxed at 90 ꢀC for 20 h under nitrogen (TLC monitoring). After
removal of acetonitrile and residual n-butylamine under vacuum,
the residue was purified by flash chromatography with petroleum
ether/ethyl acetate as eluent to give a bright yellow powder, com-
pound 5 (122.13 mg, yield: 78.2%). TLC analysis: Rf ¼ 0.6 in 50% ethyl
acetate in petroleum ether. The structure of compound 5 was
established by 1H NMR, 13C NMR, and MS [23].
2.2.3. Synthesis of 4
Excess (1.0 mL) PBr3 was added dropwise to compound 5
(60 mg, 0.19 mmol) in ClCH2CH2Cl (10 mL). This was heated at 45 ꢀC
for 4 h. A little water was added to the mixture, which was then
extracted with CH2Cl2 and dried over magnesium sulfate. After
removal of solvent under vacuum, the residue was purified by flash
chromatography with CH2Cl2 as eluent to give compound 4 as a
bright yellow powder (17 mg, yield: 23.8%). 1H NMR (400 MHz,
CDCl3), dH (ppm): 8.56 (q, 1H), 8.45 (d, 1H, J ¼ 8.0), 8.09 (t, 1H,
J ¼ 4.0), 7.59 (q, 1H), 6.70 (d, 1H, J ¼ 8.0 Hz), 4.42 (t, 2H, J ¼ 4.0 Hz),
3.64 (t, 2H, J ¼ 4.0 Hz), 3.40 (t, 2H, J ¼ 8.0 Hz), 1.80 (t, 2H, J ¼ 8.0 Hz),
1.53 (q, 2H), 1.02 (t, 3H, J ¼ 8.0 Hz). Q-TOFMS: [M ꢁ H]þ: 373.0796;
found: 373.0627.
2.3. FRET efficiency (E)
FRET efficiency can be obtained by measuring either the fluo-
rescence intensities of the donor with and without an acceptor
probe [25]. Thus
ID
E ¼ 1 ꢁ
ID0
where ID and ID0 are the intensities in the presence and the absence
of acceptor.