882 Yushi Heta et al.
Larmor frequency. Thus, the relaxivity of contrast agents
increases with increasing molecular weight and limited molec-
ular movement as a result of tumbling rate slowing and
approach to the Larmor frequency. In addition, the relaxivity
increase as a function of the alkyl chain length can also be
explained by the increased number of surfactant molecules in
the micellar aggregates, resulting in restriction of molecular
movements (15,27). The slight change of the slope of KMR-
AZ4 observed in Fig. 5a further supports the formation of
micelles. The distinguished intersection point at ca 0.53 mM of
Gd3+ separates a monomeric low relaxivity form from a
micellar high-relaxivity form. For KMR-AZ6 and 8, the
inflection point was not observed because of the difficulty of
relaxivity measurements in the range of the low CMC.
We also examined the photoresponse of the relaxivity
values. After UV irradiation, the relaxivities of KMR-AZ6 and
8 decreased and became 12.9 and 14.7 mM s)1, compared with
15.3 and 16.5 mM s)1 before UV irradiation. This experiment
indicated that the molecular movements after irradiation are
faster than those before irradiation, further supporting the fact
of photoresponse-triggered disruption of micelles. Figs. 5b and
S5 show the efficacy as contrast agents by phantom imaging
(T1-weighted) of KMR-AZ6, 8 and Magnevistꢁ (Nihon
Schering K.K.) at four different concentrations (0.8, 0.4, 0.2,
0.1 and 0.01 mM) in phosphate buffer solution at 1.5 T. The
images of KMR-AZn gradually brighten with higher concen-
trations similar to Magnevistꢁ (Nihon Schering K.K.) and
reflect the results of the measurement of the longitudinal
relaxivity.
Figure S4. Absorbance intensity at the isosbestic points of
KMR-AZn with ⁄ without Nile Red before and after dialysis
with ⁄ without UV irradiation.
Figure S5. Color version of Fig. 5b.
Please note: Wiley-Blackwell is not responsible for the
content or functionality of any supporting information
supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing
material) should be directed to the corresponding author for
the article.
REFERENCES
1. Cho, K., X. Wang, S. Nie, Z. Chen and D. M. Shin (2008)
Therapeutic nanoparticles for drug delivery in cancer. Clin. Cancer
Res. 14, 1310–1316.
2. Bae, Y. and K. Kataoka (2009) Intelligent polymeric micelles from
functional poly(ethylene glycol)-poly(amino acid) block copoly-
mers. Adv. Drug Del. Rev. 61, 768–784.
3. Needham, D. and M. W. Dewhirst (2001) The development and
testing of a new temperature-sensitive drug delivery system for the
treatment of solid tumors. Adv. Drug Del. Rev. 53, 285–305.
4. Ghosh, S., K. Irvin and S. Thayumanavan (2007) Tunable disas-
sembly of micelles using a redox trigger. Langmuir 23, 7916–7919.
5. Nolan, D., R. Darcy and B. J. Ravoo (2003) Preparation of ves-
icles and nanoparticles of amphiphilic cyclodextrins containing
labile disulfide bonds. Langmuir 19, 4469–4472.
6. Morimoto, N., N. Ogino, T. Narita, S. Kitamura and K. Akiyoshi
(2006) Enzyme-responsive molecular assembly system with amy-
lose-primer surfactants. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 129, 458–459.
7. Goodwin, A. P., J. L. Mynar, Y. Ma, G. R. Fleming and J. M. J.
Frechet (2005) Synthetic micelle sensitive to IR light via a two-
´
photon process. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 127, 9952–9953.
8. Bisby, R. H., C. Mead and C. G. Morgan (2000) Active uptake of
drugs into photosensitive liposomes and rapid release on UV
photolysis. Photochem. Photobiol. 72, 57–61.
9. Zhang, G., R. Zhang, X. Wen, L. Li and C. Li (2007) Micelles
based on biodegradable poly(L-glutamic acid)-b-polylactide with
paramagnetic GD ions chelated to the shell layer as a potential
nanoscale MRI-visible delivery system. Biomacromolecules 9, 36–
42.
10. Talelli, M., C. J. F. Rijcken, T. Lammers, P. R. Seevinck, G.
Storm, C. F. van Nostrum and W. E. Hennink (2009) Super-
paramagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles encapsulated in biode-
gradable thermosensitive polymeric micelles: toward a targeted
nanomedicine suitable for image-guided drug delivery. Langmuir
25, 2060–2067.
11. Yang, J., C.-H. Lee, H.-J. Ko, J.-S. Suh, H.-G. Yoon, K. Lee,
Y.-M. Huh and S. Haam (2007) Multifunctional magneto-
polymeric nanohybrids for targeted detection and synergistic
therapeutic effects on breast cancer. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 46,
8836–8839.
12. Lauffer, R. B. (1987) Paramagnetic metal complexes as water
proton relaxation agents for NMR imaging: theory and design.
Chem. Rev. 87, 901–927.
CONCLUSIONS
In conclusion, novel photosensitive micelles for magnetic
resonance imaging have been designed and synthesized. These
multifunctional micelles combine the properties of controlled
release of encapsulated compounds by UV irradiation, and the
higher MR contrast ability of micellar CAs. With this model,
we have been able to demonstrate a novel strategy toward drug
carriers showing both stimuli-response and MRI contrast
enhancement using only one amphiphilic molecule. In the
future, conjugation to phospholipid liposomes or mixed
micelles for in vitro applications will be considered.
Acknowledgements—The authors would like to thank Bruker
Optics K.K. for their precious help with longitudinal relaxation
measurements.
13. Caravan, P., J. J. Ellison, T. J. McMurry and R. B. Lauffer (1999)
Gadolinium(III) chelates as MRI contrast agents: structure,
dynamics, and applications. Chem. Rev. 99, 2293–2352.
14. Mulder, W. J. M., G. J. Strijkers, G. A. F. van Tilborg, A. W.
Griffioen and K. Nicolay (2006) Lipid-based nanoparticles for
contrast-enhanced MRI and molecular imaging. NMR Biomed.
19, 142–164.
SUPPORTING INFORMATION
Additional Supporting Information may be found in the online
version of this article:
Figure S1. CMC plot for KMR-AZn (fluorescence intensity
of Nile Red at 638 nm). The intersection of the two straight
lines indicates the critical micelle concentration.
Figure S2. Emission spectra of Nile Red in 10 mM of
phosphate buffer at pH 7.4 in the presence of 2 mM of sodium
dodecyl sulfate (SDS).
Figure S3. UV–Vis spectra of KMR-AZn in 10 mM of PBS
buffer with ⁄ without Nile Red before and after dialysis
with ⁄ without UV irradiation.
´
15. Nicolle, G. M., E. Toth, K.-P. Eisenwiener, H. R. Macke and
´
A. E. Merbach (2002) From monomers to micelles: investigation
of the parameters influencing proton relaxivity. J. Biol. Inorg.
Chem. 7, 757–769.
16. Wang, G., X. Tong and Y. Zhao (2004) Preparation of azoben-
zene-containing amphiphilic diblock copolymers for light-
responsive micellar aggregates. Macromolecules 37, 8911–8917.
17. Liu, X.-M., B. Yang, Y.-L. Wang and J.-Y. Wang (2005) New
nanoscale pulsatile drug delivery system. Chem. Mater. 17,
2792–2795.