A POLYLINEAR REGRESSION MODEL
R = 0.998, SD = 0.0362, N = 58, F = 6226.
1259
(6)
of the parameters of sensitivity ρYXT to the effects of the
substituents Y, calculated using the tabulated data, in the
equation log k3 = log k3st + ρYXTσY for partial reactions
in the case of different fixed substituents X and different
fixed temperatures T (ρYXT = 0.86–0.96, r ≥ 0.992).
The statistical characteristics of regression (6) are
indicative of high reliability of all its coefficients. The
adequacy of the rate constants log k3calc, calculated us-
ing this regression, to the experimental log k3exp data is
demonstrated by Eq. (7) in which the slope is virtually
equal to the expected unity:
In the general case, according to the PLP, the joint
effect of the substituents X and Y and temperature T on
the rate of reactions (1), taking into account the cross-
interaction of the effects of all the three varied factors,
should be estimated using the PLE:
log k3calc = (0.029 ± 0.026) + (1.004 ± 0.007)k3exp
r = 0.999, SD = 0.0379, N = 58.
,
(7)
logk3 = logk3st + ρXstσX + ρYstσY + BTst × 103/T + ρXsYt σXσY
Elimination from Eq. (7) of the statistically insignifi-
cant intercept term gives logk3calc = (1.004 ± 0.007)k3exp
+ q σX × 103/T + qYsTtσY × 103/T + qXYTσXσY × 103/T, (3)
s t
XT
,
which relationship demonstrates an excellent agreement
between the calculated and experimental log k3 values.
where k3st is the rate constant under standard conditions
st
st
st
(σX = σY = 0, T = ∞ K); ρX , ρY , and B , parameters of
the standard reactions at σY = 0 and T =T∞ K, σX = 0 and
Owing to the statistically significant coefficient at
the cross-member (qXT = –2.85 ± 0.02), regression
(6) is isoparametric. It is characterized by two IPPs,
namely, that for the constant of the substituent X,
σXIP = –BTst/qXT = 0.63, and that for the reciprocal of the
s t
st
T = ∞ K, and σX = σY = 0, respectively; ρXY, qXT, and
qYsTt , pair interaction coefficients in the standard reaction
series (at T = ∞ K, σY = 0, and σX = 0, respectively); and
qXYT, triple cross-interaction coefficient.
temperature 103/TIP= –ρXst/qXT = 3.42, TIP = 292 K, as well
By processing the results of the multifactor kinetic
experiment using Eq. (3), a polylinear regression was
calculated (R is the multiple correlation coefficient, and
F, Fisher’s exact test):
st
as by isoparametric value log k3IP = log k3st – ρX BTst/qXT
=
–4.57, identical for the both IPPs. It should be noted that
st
log k3IP is part of the apparent log k3 = log k IP + ρY σY =
–4.57 + (0.91 ± 0.02)σY value, and only at 3the standard
value σY = 0 (Y = H) log k3 = log k3IP.
logk3 = (5.1 ± 0.2) + (–15.6 ± 0.7)σХ + (1.2 ± 0.3)σY
+ (–2.83 ± 0.05) × 103/T + (0.4 ± 1.4)σХσY
+ (4.6 ± 0.2)σX × 103/T + (–0.08 ± 0.09)σY × 103/T
+ (–0.1 ± 0.4)σXσY × 103/T,
At the IPP σXIP = 0.63 the rate of the process (logk3)
should be temperature-independent. The figure illustrates
a decrease in sensitivity to the effect of temperature in the
reaction involving 3-bromobenzoic acid, with the IPPσXIP
being approached on changing from electron-donating to
electron-accepting substituent X in pyridine. The reac-
tions involving 3-CN-pyridine, for which the constant
σX = 0.56 in the case of the substituent X = 3-CN is little
different from the isoparametric value σXIP = 0.63, exhibit
low sensitivity to the effect of the temperature. These
reactions are characterized by close to zero slopes BTXY
in the Arrhenius equation log k3 = A X=Y∞ + BTXY×103/T
(r ≥ 0.995): Y = 3-Br, log k3 = (–3.17T± 0.06) + (–0.30 ±
0.02) × 103/T;Y= 3-NO2, log k3 = (–2.8 ± 0.1) + (–0.31 ±
0.03) × 103/T. As a consequence, the apparent activation
energies EaXY = –2.303R × BTXY×103 (R is gas constant)
are low: 5.7 and 5.9 kJ mol–1, respectively.
R = 0.998, SD = 0.0367, N = 58, F = 3260.
(4)
As might be expected, in regression (4) the already
discussed ρXY, qYT, andqXYT coefficients are statistically
insignificant.After exclusion of the cross-terms with these
coefficients, PLE (3) is simplified to the form
log k3 = log k3st + ρXstσX + ρYstσY + BTst × 103/T
+ qXTσX ×103/T.
(5)
Processing the kinetic data by Eq. (5) gave
log k3 = (5.18 ± 0.08) + (–15.4 ± 0.3)σХ
+ (0.91 ± 0.02)σY + (–2.85 ± 0.02) × 103/T
+ (4.5 ± 0.1)σX × 103/T,
As to the IPP for temperature TIP= 292 K, its realiza-
tion in experiment is clearly demonstrated by the figure,
in which it appears as the intersection point of the family
of the correlation straight lines in the Arrhenius equa-
RUSSIAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED CHEMISTRY Vol. 86 No. 8 2013