S. Tebayashi et al. / Phytochemistry 54 (2000) 387±392
391
(
2:98, v/v) under ultrasonication. The combined
mm  20 mm) using H O±MeCN (77:23, v/v) as sol-
2
extract, after concentration to ca. 100 ml, was washed
with hexane and fractionated with an ODS column
(
Japan) by eluting with H O and MeOH (500 ml each).
The MeOH fraction which contained hydroxycinnamic
acid amides was fractionated on a polyamide column
vent (yield 33.4%).
Ion-spray MS, m/z (rel. int.): 360 [M+H] (52), 163
+
1
Cosmosil 75C -OPN, 50 g, 81 mm  40 mm, Nacalai,
(100); H NMR spectral data (300 MHz, DMSO-d ): d
1
8
6
2.72 (1H, dd, J = 13.9, 9.2 Hz), 2.90 (1H, dd, J =
13.9, 5.0 Hz), 4.44 (1H, ddd, J = 9.2, 8.0, 5.0 Hz),
6.41 (1H, d, J = 15.7 Hz), 6.48 (1H, dd, J = 8.0, 1.9
Hz), 6.61 (1H, d, J = 8.2), 6.62(1H, s), 6.74 (1H, d, J
= 8.1 Hz), 6.83 (1H, dd, J = 8.2, 1.8 Hz), 6.94 (1H,
d, J = 1.8 Hz), 7.20 (1H, d, J = 15.7 Hz), 8.18 (1H,
d, J = 8.0 Hz), 8.66 (1H, br s), 8.71 (1H, br s), 9.11
(1H, br s), 9.35 (1H, br s ).
2
(Polyamide C-200, 30 g, 91 mm  40 mm, Wako,
Japan) by eluting with 500 ml each of H O, H O±
2
2
MeOH (1:1, v/v), MeOH and HOAc±MeOH (3:17), re-
spectively. Finally, amides were puri®ed from the
HOAc±MeOH (3:17) fraction by reversed phase pre-
parative HPLC (column: Wakosil-II 5C18 HG, 250
mm  20 mm). The following HPLC conditions were
used: linear gradient: 0±40% B/A for 15 min (solvent
Caeoyltyrosine (2), p-coumaroyl DOPA (3) and p-
coumaroyltyrosine (4) were synthesized using the
above protocol. Caeoyltyrosine (2): ion-spray MS,
+
1
A: HOAc±H O (3:97, v/v), solvent B: MeCN); ¯ow
2
m/z (rel. int.): 344 [M+H] (50), 163 (100); H NMR
spectral data (300 MHz, DMSO-d ): d 2.72 (1H, dd, J
rate: 10 ml/min; detection: 280 nm. Because com-
pounds 2 and 3 were eluted together, they were ana-
lyzed as a mixture.
6
= 13.8, 9.3 Hz), 2.98 (1H, dd, J = 13.9, 4.8 Hz), 4.44
(1H, ddd, J = 9.3, 8.2, 4.8 Hz), 6.41 (1H, d, J = 15.7
Hz), 6.65 (2H, d, J = 8.2 Hz), 6.74 (1H, d, J = 8.2
Hz), 6.83 (1H, d, J = 8.3 Hz), 6.94 (1H, s ), 7.03 (2H,
d, J = 8.2 Hz), 7.19 (1H, d, J = 15.7 Hz), 8.21 (1H,
d, J = 8.2 Hz), 9.06 (1H, br s), 9.19 (1H, br s), 9.36
(1H, br s).
Compound 1 (11.2 mg): ion-spray MS, m/z (rel.
+
int.): 360 [M+H] (49), 163 (100); H NMR spectral
data (300 MHz, DMSO-d ): d 2.73 (1H, dd, J =13.9,
1
6
9
.2 Hz), 2.92 (1H, dd, J = 13.9, 4.8 Hz), 4.44 (1H,
ddd, J = 9.2, 8.0, 4.8 Hz), 6.41 (1H, d, J = 15.7 Hz),
.50 (1H, dd, J = 8.1, 1.8 Hz), 6.62 (1H, d, J = 8.20
6
p-Coumaroyl DOPA (3): ion-spray MS, m/z (rel.
+
int.): 344 [M+H] (45), 147 (100); H NMR spectral
1
Hz), 6.63(1H, s), 6.76 (1H, d, J = 8.1 Hz), 6.86 (1H,
dd, J = 8.2, 1.8 Hz), 6.96 (1H, d, J = 1.8 Hz), 7.21
data (300 MHz, DMSO-d ): d 2.73 (1H, dd, J = 13.8,
6
(
9
1H, d, J = 15.7 Hz), 8.21 (1H, d, J = 7.2 Hz), 8.7±
.4 (4H, br m ).
Compounds 2±4 were isolated and identi®ed by
9.2 Hz), 2.91 (1H, dd, J = 13.8, 4.7 Hz), 4.44 (1H,
ddd, J = 9.2, 8.0, 4.7 Hz), 6.48 (1H, d, J = 8.1 Hz),
6.49 (1H, d, J = 15.4 Hz), 6.61 (1H, d, J = 8.0 Hz),
6.62 (1H, s), 6.79 (2H, d, J = 8.1 Hz), 7.28 (1H, d, J
= 15.7 Hz), 7.38 (2H, d, J = 8.3 Hz), 8.16 (1H, d, J
= 8.0 Hz), 8.68 (1H, br s), 8.73 (1H, br s), 9.83 (1H,
br s ).
comparison with authentic standards and comparison
with literature data (Yoshihara et al., 1977; Van Heer-
den et al., 1980; Cliord et al., 1988).
4
.4. Preparation of synthetic 1±4
p-Coumaroyltyrosine (4): ion-spray MS, m/z (rel.
+
1
int.): 328 [M+H] (59), 147 (100); H NMR spectral
data (300 MHz, DMSO-d ): d 2.80 (1H, dd, J = 13.8,
Synthesis of caeoyl DOPA (1) was carried out by
6
the method of Villegas and Brodelius (1990) with a
slight modi®cation. Caeic acid (3.0 mmol), L-3,4-dihy-
droxyphenylalanine methyl ester hydrochloride (1.5
mmol) and dicyclohexylcarbodiimide (3.3 mmol) were
dissolved in dry pyridine (10 ml) and the mixture was
stirred at room temperature for 24 h. After evapor-
ation of pyridine in vacuo, the residue was dissolved in
MeOH (20 ml). The solution was cooled in an ice bath
after which 2 M KOH (200 ml) was added. The mix-
9.2 Hz), 2.98 (1H, dd, J = 13.8, 4.8 Hz), 4.47 (1H,
ddd, J = 9.2, 8.1, 4.8 Hz), 6.48 (1H, d, J = 15.7 Hz),
6.65 (2H, d, J = 8.4 Hz), 6.79 (2H, d, J = 8.6 Hz),
7.03 (2H, d, J = 8.4 Hz), 7.28 (1H, d, J = 15.7 Hz),
7.38 (2H, d, J = 8.6 Hz), 8.19 (1H, d, J = 8.1 Hz),
9.19 (1H, br s ), 9.82 (1H, br s).
References
ture was stirred under N at room temperature for 4 h
2
and then neutralized with HOAc. The solvent was
evaporated in vacuo and the residue was dissolved in
MeOH (50 ml).
Dicyclohexylurea and salts were removed by ®l-
tration. After evaporation of solvent, the ®ltrate was
fractionated using a polyamide column (Polyamide C-
Bordin, A.P.A., Mayama, S., Tani, T., 1991. Annals of the
Phytopathological Society of Japan 57 (5), 688±695.
Clarke, D.D., 1982. In: Wood, R.S.K. (Ed.), Active Defence
Mechanisms in Plants. Plenum Press, New York.
Cliord, M.N., Kellard, B., Ah-sing, E., 1988. Phytochemistry 28
(
7), 1989±1990.
Creelman, R.A., Mullet, J.E., 1997. Annual Review of Plant
Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology 48, 355±381.
200) by eluting with H O±MeOH (3:1, v/v). Finally,
2
caeoyl DOPA was puri®ed by reversed phase pre-
parative HPLC (column: Wakosil-II 5C18 HG, 250
Curtis, M.D., Rae, A.L., Rusu, A.G., Harrison, S.J., Manners, J.M.,
1997. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions 10 (3), 326±338.