180
M.J. Almond et al. / Journal of Organometallic Chemistry 640 (2001) 177–181
photosensitisation of the O-donor molecule such as was
seen, for example, in the oxidation of M(CO)6 (M=Cr,
Mo or W) to metal oxides by CO2 or N2O upon
photolysis at wavelengths too long for the O-donor to
absorb [14].
The next reaction steps must involve insertion of O
atoms into the remaining SiꢀSi bonds. Here it is known
from Alnaimi and Weber’s work that SiꢀSi bonds adja-
cent to O atoms are significantly more reactive than
those not bonded to oxygen; the insertion of one O
atom promotes the insertion of other O atoms [10].
Despite this, Alnaimi and Weber were able to observe
and record infrared spectra of all the intermediate
species Me12Si6On (n=1–6). While in most regions
these species show very similar infrared absorptions, for
the strongest band, that arising from wasym(SiꢀOꢀSi),
there are differences in the band position as follows:
n=1, w=1040 cm−1; n=2, w=1030 cm−1; n=3,
w=1070 cm−1; n=4, w=1065–1075 cm−1; n=5, w=
1065–1070 cm−1; n=6, w=1060–1090 cm−1 [10].
Close inspection of the spectra illustrated in Fig. 1
reveals that the exact position of the broad band in this
region does change slightly as photolysis proceeds. Af-
ter 6–9 h of photolysis, there are two peaks centred at
around 1040 and 1070 cm−1; after ca. 20 h of photoly-
sis, the higher wavenumber feature is dominant and the
lower wavenumber feature seems to have disappeared
completely after the window has been warmed to room
temperature. This provides some evidence that there are
species with different numbers of O atoms present in
the matrix, even if only at low concentrations, and that
the species with six O atoms predominates only after
prolonged photolysis and annealing. We observe no
other features which may be assigned to different prod-
ucts, but this is not too surprising given the known
similarity in the infrared spectra of these different oxi-
dation products [10].
In order to search more systematically for intermedi-
ates in this reaction we carried out experiments in
which (Me2Si)6 isolated in a 2% C2H4O-doped argon
matrix was photolysed using the low-pressure mercury
lamp. The purpose of this experiment was to limit the
concentration of the O-donor in order to attempt to
generate less oxygen-rich products. The spectral
changes observed when the matrix was photolysed for
21 h are shown in Fig. 3. New bands are seen but these
are much weaker than in the case of the 20% C2H4O-
doped matrix. The principal new bands seen upon
photolysis are listed in Table 1. These bands are at
similar positions to those seen for the product in 20%
C2H4O- or 20% N2O-doped argon matrices. The most
significant difference is perhaps the position of the
broad band arising from w(SiꢀO). In the 2% doped
matrix this band is centred around 1038 cm−1 which is
close to the reported positions of the most intense
infrared bands of Me12Si6O and Me12Si6O2 [10]. This
Fig. 3. Infrared transmission spectra in the region 1400–600 cm−1
seen upon photolysis of (Me2Si)6 (at a concentration of ca. 1%) in an
argon matrix doped with 2% ethylene oxide. The matrix support was
a CsI window at 12 K and the photolysis source used was a
low-pressure mercury lamp with output centred at u=254 nm.
Spectrum A, after deposition; spectrum B, after photolysis for 3 h;
spectrum C, after photolysis for 21 h.
conditions, of argon matrices containing either 20%
C2H4O or 20% N2O but no (Me2Si)6 led to no observ-
able changes in the infrared spectra. However, (Me2Si)6
is known to absorb at this wavelength resulting in SiꢀSi
bond cleavage [11–13]—probably via s–s* transitions
involving electrons in the SiꢀSi bonds. The first step in
the reaction is probably therefore rupture of a SiꢀSi
bond in (Me2Si)6. In the absence of, or at low concen-
trations of O-donors the reaction then proceeds to
extrude Me2Si and to form the pentamer (Me2Si)5 [4].
When low concentrations of O-donors are present this
may react to give the silanone Me2SiꢁO [6]. At higher
concentrations of O-donors it is not unreasonable to
assume that some form of adduct may be formed
between the O-donor and either the starting material or
the species with the cleaved SiꢀSi bond, leading to
photosensitisation of the O-donor. This, in turn, may
allow insertion of an O atom into the SiꢀSi bond. That
we do not observe any such adduct directly is probably
not surprising given (i) that it would doubtless be much
more reactive than the starting material or the product,
and (ii) that its infrared spectrum would probably be
not much different from that of the starting material.
We have compared the infrared spectra of (Me2Si)6
isolated in pure argon and in 20% N2O- or C2H4O-
doped argon matrices. These spectra show no signifi-
cant differences. Although there is a slight broadening
of bands in the doped matrices, the band positions are
identical to within 92 cm−1. Thus there is no direct
evidence for the formation of an adduct between
(Me2Si)6 and the O-donor which might account for