GMA Reaction Mechanism
GMA in an aprotic solvent. Li et al.19 discussed the reaction
mechanisms between the chondroitin sulfate and the GMA in a
protic solvent at pH 7.6. Both of the reaction mechanisms may
take place simultaneously, depending on pH and the chemical
nature of the solvent. It has been also described that the
transesterification mechanism is a rapid and reversible reaction
route and that the epoxide ring-opening mechanism is a slow
and irreversible reaction route. Over the initial stage of the
reaction, there is a predominant formation of the resultant
products of the transesterification. With the evolution of the
reaction, there is a decrease in pH of the reaction medium that
limits the transesterification and makes the epoxide ring-opening
mechanism more favorable. By this logic, for a long period of
reaction, the formation of the resultant products of the epoxide
ring-opening mechanism would be predominant over that of the
transesterification mechanism. However, the reaction of chon-
droitin sulfate by GMA at pH 3 indeed occurs via epoxide ring
opening.13 In this case, there is an attachment of a whole GMA
molecule onto the sulfate and carboxylic groups of the chon-
droitin sulfate. When the reaction is processed via transesteri-
fication, only hydroxyl groups of the polysaccharide are directly
attached to the methacryloyl groups from the GMA. Although
the reaction mechanism of the GMA with chondroitin sulfate
in an aqueous medium has been described, there is still an
interesting question that remains to be answered: could the
hydroxyl groups of the chondroitin sulfate also react with the
GMA by way of an epoxide ring-opening route in a protic
solvent? With the purpose of responding to this question and
also complementing the studies performed by both van Dijk-
Wolthuis et al.1 and Li et al.,19 a detailed examination of the
reaction mechanisms of poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA) and poly-
(acrylic acid) (PAAc) by GMA in water was performed. The
idea of using these polymers as model compounds may be based
on their chemical structures: the presence of the hydroxyl groups
of PVA and the carboxyl groups of PAAc allowed for a better
evaluation of the reaction mechanisms. The use of polymers
with different functional groups enabled us to better understand
and describe the resultant products and mechanisms of reactions
by GMA. Functionalization of macromolecules by way of either
the ring opening of epoxides20 or transesterification21 is an
important issue on laboratorial and industrial scales. There have
been no reports describing a thorough investigation on the
reaction mechanisms of GMA with macromolecules in water.
This work aims to be a contribution for a better comprehension
of the reaction mechanisms of macromolecules by GMA.
FIGURE 1. Schema of the chemical reaction of GMA with a
macromolecule by way of transesterification and epoxide ring-opening
mechanisms.
recommended for uses in the development of new modified
drug-delivery devices and vitro-retinal replacement surgery.8-14
Furthermore, superabsorbent hydrogels for applications in which
the efficient use of water is required, for example, soil con-
ditioning in agriculture, can be synthesized through a polym-
erization cross-linking reaction at the vinyl moiety of the
modified polymer with acrylic monomers.5
There are two reaction routes that explain chemical modifica-
tions of natural and synthetic polymers through the use of the
GMA: transesterification and epoxide ring-opening mech-
anisms.14-18 The reaction mechanism of GMA with dextran
(Dex), by using dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) as a solvent and
4-(N,N-dimethylamino)pyridine (DMAP) as a catalytic agent,
has been reported by van Dijk-Wolthuis et al.1,2 It has been
found that transesterification is the predominant route for the
GMA-Dex system when a polar aprotic solvent, such as the
DMSO, is used as a reaction medium. Methacrylated Dex was
found as a main product and glycidol (GDOL) as a byproduct.
Equivalent results were verified when inulin was treated with
(4) Vervoort, L.; Van Der Mooter, G.; Augustijns, P.; Busson, R.; Toppet,
R.; Kinget, R. Pharm. Res. 1997, 14, 1730–1737.
(5) Guilherme, M. R.; Reis, A. V.; Takahashi, S. H.; Rubira, A. F.; Feitosa,
J. P. A.; Muniz, E. C. Carbohydr. Polym. 2005, 61, 464–471.
(6) Reis, A. V.; Cavalcanti, O. A.; Rubira, A. F.; Muniz, E. C. Int. J. Pharm.
2003, 267, 13–25.
Results and Discussion
(7) Reis, A. V.; Guilherme, M. R.; Rubira, A. F.; Muniz, E. C. Polymer
2006, 47, 2023–2029.
Spectroscopic Characterization of GMA and Modified
Polymers in pH 3.5 and pH 10.5. GMA Molecule. For a better
evaluation of the GMA reaction with the polymers, a more
detailed schema of both the transesterification and the epoxide
ring-opening mechanisms is shown in Figure 1. The reaction
products that result in an epoxide ring opening pathway are two
isomers: 3-methacryloyl-1-glyceryl and 3-methacryloyl-2-glyc-
eryl esters. Methacrylated polymer, as the main product, and
GDOL as the byproduct are the results of a transesterification
(8) Vervoort, L.; Rombout, P.; Van Der Mooter, G.; Augustijns, P.; Kinget,
R. Int. J. Pharm. 1998, 172, 137–145.
(9) Rubinstein, A. Drug DeV. Res. 2000, 50, 435–439.
(10) Chen, L. G.; Liu, Z. L.; Zhuo, R. X. Polymer 2005, 6, 6274–6281.
(11) Basan, H.; Gumusderelioglu, M.; Orbey, M. T. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm.
2007, 65, 39–46.
(12) Gliko-Kabir, I.; Yagen, B.; Baluom, M.; Rubinstein, A. J. Controlled
Release 2000, 63, 129–134.
(13) Reis, A. V.; Guilherme, M. R.; Mattoso, L. H. C.; Rubira, A. F.;
Tambougi, E. B.; Muniz, E. C. Pharm. Res. 2009, 26, 438–444.
(14) Tortora, M.; Cavalieri, F.; Chiessi, E.; Paradossi, G. Biomacromolecules
2007, 8, 209–214.
1
(15) Ferreira, L.; Vidal, M. M.; Geraldes, C. F. G. C.; Gil, M. H. Carbohydr.
Polym. 2000, 41, 15–24.
(16) Hennink, W. E.; Franssen, O.; van Dijk-Wolthuis, W. N. E.; Talsma,
H. J. Controlled Release 1997, 48, 107–114.
pathway. Figure 2a,b shows the H and 13C NMR reference
spectra of GMA. The resonance lines in both of the NMR
(17) Crispim, E. G.; Piai, J. F.; Rubira, A. F.; Muniz, E. C. Polym. Test.
2006, 25, 377–383.
(18) Ferreira, L.; Vidal, M. M.; Geraldes, C. F. G. C.; Gil, M. H. Carbohydr.
Polym 2000, 41, 15–24.
(19) Li, Q.; Wang, D.; Elisseeff, J. H. Macromolecules 2003, 36, 2556–
2562.
(20) Holbach, M.; Weck, M. J. Org. Chem. 2006, 71, 1825–1836.
(21) Co´rdova, A.; Janda, K. D. J. Org. Chem. 2001, 66, 1906–1909.
J. Org. Chem. Vol. 74, No. 10, 2009 3751