INFLUENCE OF UNSATURATION ON MACROLACTONIZATION
Syntheses
mations, respectively. In the case of 9 the multiplicity of the
conformations to be used in the computation of the probabilities
had to be recovered by molecular geometry. Conformational
searches on cycles 2, 3, 5, and 6 have been performed with 50
000-step Monte Carlo searches. In all cases only the conformers
within 5 kcal molꢀ1 above the minimum have been kept.
Semiempirical calculations have been performed at the AM1
level.
All reactions were performed under dry nitrogen. Products have
been purified by chromatography on silica gel (Merck
70–230mesh and Merck 230–400mesh).
The synthesis of 1, 2, and 3 has been performed according to
[23]
Reference
The synthesis of 10 has been performed according to
.
[24]
Reference
.
(15S,16S)-15,16-dihydroxy-octadecanoic acid (4). A mixture
of the methyl ester of 1 (130 mg, 0.4 mmol), BaSO4 (catalytic
amount) in methanol (2 ml) was stirred under a H2 atmosphere
for 2 h at 258C. The mixture was filtered through silica gel to
eliminate the catalyst, using methanol as eluent and concen-
trated to give the saturated ester of 1 (126 mg, 0.38 mmol, 95%).
The product was then dissolved in 1,2-dimethoxyethane (25 ml)
with lithium hydroxide (3 M, 67 ml) and stirred at 258C for 30 min.
The mixture was acidified with hydrochloric acid to pH 1 and the
water layer was extracted with CH2Cl2 (3 Â 25 ml). The combined
organic layers were dried (Na2SO4), filtered, and concentrated to
give dihydroxy acid 4 (119 mg, 0.38 mmol, 97%) which was used
without further purification.
Acknowledgements
Financial support from the MIUR is gratefully acknowledged.
REFERENCES
[1] H. J. Jacobson, W. H. Stockmayer, J. Chem. Phys. 1950, 18, 1600–1606.
[2] L. Mandolini, Adv. Phys. Org. Chem. 1986, 22, 1–111.
[3] K.-S. Yeung, I. Paterson, Angew. Chem. 2002, 114, 4826–4847.
[4] A. Parenty, X. Moreau, J.-M. Campagne, Chem. Rev. 2006, 106,
911–939.
[5] S. J. Rowan, S. J. Cantrill, G. R. L. Cousins, J. K. M. Sanders, J. F. Stoddart,
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 898–952.
[6] T. Caruso, G. Monaco, A. Peluso, A. Spinella, Org. Biomol. Chem. 2004,
2, 3425.
[7] E. J. Corey, S. Iguchi, J. O. Albright, B. De, Tetrahedron Lett. 1983, 24,
37–40.
[8] J. Dale, Acta Chem. Scand. 1973, 27, 1115.
[9] H. F. Dos Santos, W. R. Rocha, W. B. De Almeida, Chem. Phys. 2002, 280,
31–42.
[10] G. Ercolani, L. Mandolini, P. Mencarelli, S. Roelens, J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1993, 115, 3901–3908.
[11] C. Galli, L. Mandolini, Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2000, 3117–3125.
1H NMR d (CDCl3): 3.45-3.41 (1H, m); 3.39-3.32 (1H, m); 2.34 (2H,
t, J ¼ 7.6 Hz); 1.68-1.54 (6H, m); 1.51-1.42 (6H, m); 1.34-1.29 (12H,
m); 1.02 (3H, t, J ¼ 7.6 Hz).
13C NMR d (CDCl3): 177.2, 75.8, 74.00, 36.1, 34.00, 33.3, 30.4
(2CH2), 30.2, 29.3, 29.2, 29.1, 26.3, 25.6, 25.7, 19.8, 13.0, 10.7 (CH3).
15-hydroxy-esadecanoic acid (12). A mixture of the methyl
ester of 10 (130 mg, 0.4 mmol), BaSO4 (catalytic amount) in
methanol (2 ml) was stirred under a H2 atmosphere for 2 h at
258C. The mixture was filtered through silica gel to eliminate the
catalyst, using methanol as eluent and concentrated to give the
saturated ester of 10 (126 mg, 0.38 mmol, 95%). The product was
then dissolved in 1,2-dimethoxyethane (25 ml) with lithium
hydroxide (3 M, 67 ml) and stirred at 258C for 30 min. The mixture
was acidified with hydrochloric acid to pH 1 and the water layer
was extracted with CH2Cl2 (3 Â 25 ml). The combined organic
layers were dried (Na2SO4), filtered, and concentrated to give
hydroxy acid 12 (119 mg, 0.38 mmol, 97%) which was used
without further purification.
´
[12] M. Stoll, A. Rouve, G. Stoll-Comte, Helv. Chim. Acta 1934, 17, 1289.
[13] D. Seebach, U. Bra¨ndli, H.-M. Mu¨ller, M. Dobler, M. Egli, M. Przybylski,
K. Schneider, Helv. Chim. Acta 1989, 72, 1704–1717.
[14] S. J. Rowan, J. K. M. Sanders, J. Org. Chem. 1998, 63, 1536–1546.
´
[15] A. Demeter, V. Mile, T. Berces, J. Phys. Chem. A 2007, 111, 8942–8949.
[16] M. J. S. Dewwar, E. G. Zoebisch, E. F. Healy, J. J. P. Stewart, J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1985, 107, 3908.
[17] E. J. Corey, H. Niwa, J. R. Falck, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1979, 101, 1586.
[18] J. Mulzer, H. M. Kirstein, J. Buschmann, C. Lehmann, P. Luger, J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 910.
[19] J. D. White, P. R. Blakemore, C. C. Browder, J. Hong, C. M. Lincoln, P. A.
Nagornyy, L. A. Robarge, D. J. Wardrop, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123,
8593.
[20] J. Blankenstein, J. Zhu, Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 1949–1964.
[21] J. I. Seeman, Chem. Rev. 1983, 83, 83–134.
[22] T. Matsushima, K. Horita, N. Nakajima, O. Yonemitsu, Tetrahedron Lett.
1996, 37, 383.
1H NMR d (CDCl3): 3.82-3.76 (1H, m), 2.34 (2H, t, J ¼ 7.6 Hz),
1.67-1.44 (2H, m); 1.44-1.24 (22H, m), 1.18 (3H, d, J ¼ 6.0 Hz).
13C NMR d (CDCl3): 178, 68.07 (CH), 39.04, 33.89, 29.54 (5CH2),
29.44, 29.26, 28.93, 25.58, 24.62, 23.07 (CH3).
Computational methods
All calculations have been performed with SPARTAN 04.[25]
Molecular mechanics calculations have been performed by the
Merck molecular force field (MMFF).[26] Systematic conformation-
al searches have been performed for compounds 7, 8, and 9,
corresponding to the investigation of 35, 37, and 39 confor-
[23] T. Caruso, A. Spinella, Tetrahedron: Asymmetry, 2002, 13, 2071–2073.
[24] A. Spinella, T. Caruso, M. Martino, C. Sessa, Synlett. 2001, 12,
1971–1973.
[25] SPARTAN ’04, Wavefunction Inc. 18401 Von Karman Avenue, Suite
370; Irvine, CA 92612.
[26] T. A. Halgren, J. Comp. Chem. 1996, 17, 490.
J. Phys. Org. Chem. 2009, 22 978–985
Copyright ß 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.