J. J. Weterings et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 16 (2006) 3258–3261
3261
antigen presentation assay is independent of the matura-
tion status of the antigen-presenting cells, the enhance-
ment of the antigen presentation of the conjugates
may be explained by the improved targeting of the con-
jugate to the DCs compared to the free peptide. The lack
of DC activation by the conjugates is likely due to either
the poor binding of the conjugated ligand to TLR7 as a
result of steric hindrance of the peptide moiety, the im-
paired intracellular trafficking of the conjugated ligand
compared to free 2, or both.
7. Lee, J.; Chuang, T. H.; Redecke, V.; She, L. P.; Pitha, P.
M.; Carson, D. A.; Raz, E.; Cottam, H. B. Proc. Natl.
Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2003, 100, 6646.
8
. Tighe, H.; Takabayashi, K.; Schwartz, D.; Marsden, R.;
Beck, L.; Corbeil, J.; Richman, D. D.; Eiden, J. J.;
Spiegelberg, H. L.; Raz, E. Eur. J. Immunol. 2000, 30,
1
939.
9
. Wille-Reece, U.; Flynn, B. J.; Lore, K.; Koup, R. A.;
Kedl, R. M.; Mattapallil, J. J.; Weiss, W. R.; Roederer,
M.; Seder, R. A. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2005, 102,
15190.
1
0. (a) Spohn, R.; Buwitt-Beckmann, U.; Brock, R.; Jung, G.;
Ulmer, A. J.; Wiesmuller, K. H. Vaccine 2004, 22, 2494;
According to this line of reasoning the stimulatory
capacity of the conjugates can be restored by the intro-
duction of cleavable linker between the TLR-ligand and
the peptide moiety allowing release of the ligand after
internalization. The internalization itself can be im-
proved by inclusion of functionalities known to enhance
endosomal uptake.
(
b) Daftarian, P.; Sharan, R.; Haq, W.; Ali, S.; Longmate,
J.; Termini, J.; Diamond, D. J. Vaccine 2005, 23, 3453.
1. Kurimoto, A.; Ogino, T.; Ichii, S.; Isobe, Y.; Tobe, M.;
Ogita, H.; Takaku, H.; Sajiki, H.; Hirota, K.; Kawakami,
H. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2004, 12, 1091.
2. Hirota, K.; Kazaoka, K.; Niimoto, I.; Kumihara, H.;
Sajiki, H.; Isobe, Y.; Takaku, H.; Tobe, M.; Ogita, H.;
Ogino, T.; Ichii, S.; Kurimoto, A.; Kawakami, H. J. Med.
Chem. 2002, 45, 5419.
13. Rostovtsev, V. V.; Green, L. G.; Fokin, V. V.; Sharpless,
K. B. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 2596.
4. (a) Tornoe, C. W.; Christensen, C.; Meldal, M. J. Org.
Chem. 2002, 67, 3057; (b) Bock, V. D.; Hiemstra, H.; van
Maarseveen, J. H. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 51; (c) Kolb,
H. C.; Sharpless, K. B. Drug Discovery Today 2003, 8,
1
1
The design, synthesis and evaluation of such next-gener-
ation conjugates are now in progress and will be reported
in due course.
1
Acknowledgment
1
128.
This work has been funded by Netherlands Organisa-
tion for Scientific Research (NWO) as a part of the
1
5. Zwaveling, S.; Mota, S. C. F.; Nouta, J.; Johnson, M.;
Lipford, G. B.; Offringa, R.; van der Burg, S. H.; Melief,
C. J. M. J. Immunol. 2002, 169, 350.
‘
From Molecule to Cell’ program.
1
1
1
6. Brik, A.; Wu, C. Y.; Best, M. D.; Wong, C. H. Bioorg.
Med. Chem. 2005, 13, 4622.
7. Langli, G.; Gundersen, L. L.; Rise, F. Tetrahedron 1996,
Supplementary data
5
2, 5625.
8. Li, J.; Zacharek, S.; Chen, X.; Wang, J. Q.; Zhang, W.;
Detailed experimental procedures and characterization
Janczuk, A.; Wang, P. G. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 1999, 7,
1
549.
1
2
2
9. Sabatino, G.; Mulinacci, B.; Alcaro, M. C.; Chelli, M.;
Rovero, P.; Papini, A. M. Lett. Pept. Sci. 2002, 9, 119.
0. Pearson, D. A.; Blanchette, M.; Baker, M. L.; Guindon,
C. A. Tetrahedron Lett. 1989, 30, 2739.
1. Conjugates 3, 4 and 5 were dissolved in 30% hexafluoro-
isopropanol/water and analyzed with LC/MS. Gradients
of B in A/C (9:1) were applied over 15 min. Solvent
system: A, 100% water; B, 100% acetonitrile; C, 1% TFA
in water.
References and notes
1
. Pashine, A.; Valiante, N. M.; Ulmer, J. B. Nat. Med. 2005,
1, S63.
. Janeway, C. A.; Medzhitov, R. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 2002,
0, 197.
. Takeda, K.; Akira, S. Int. Immunol. 2005, 17, 1.
. Deres, K.; Schild, H.; Wiesmuller, K. H.; Jung, G.;
Rammensee, H. G. Nature 1989, 342, 561.
1
Compound 3: LC/MS 10–70% B, t = 13.44 min. ESI-MS:
R
+
[M+H] : 2530.6 (calcd 2530.5).
2
2
Compound 4: LC/MS 10–70% B, t = 12.47 min; ESI-MS:
R
2
[M+H] : 1506.8 (calcd 1506.5).
+
3
4
Compound 5: LC/MS: 10–70% B, t = 12.35 min; ESI-
R
2
MS: [M+H] : 1506.8 (calcd 1506.5).
+
5
6
. Krieg, A. M. Nat. Med. 2003, 9, 831–835.
22. Bourel, L.; Carion, O.; Gras-Masse, H.; Melnyk, O. J.
Pept. Sci. 2000, 6, 264.
23. The antigen presentation data for compounds 4 and 5 are
included in Supplementary data (Figure S6).
. Hemmi, H.; Kaisho, T.; Takeuchi, O.; Sato, S.; Sanjo, H.;
Hoshino, K.; Horiuchi, T.; Tomizawa, H.; Takeda, K.;
Akira, S. Nat. Immunol. 2002, 3, 196.