116
Russ. Chem. Bull., Int. Ed., Vol. 69, No. 1, January, 2020
Chernikova et al.
as an eluent, flow rate of 0.1 mL min–1) operating in the positive
and negative ion modes at the capillary potentials of 4.5 and
–3.5 kV, respectively; the atmospheric-pressure chemical ioniza-
tion (APCI) was used as an ionization method, the APCI inter-
face, heater and vaporizer temperatures were 250, 200 and 230 C,
respectively, the interface capillary voltage was 25÷–25 V. The
hydrolysis of the ester group occurred in the acidic
medium. Similarly to chlorination of 2, chlorination of
compound 3 with the use of KCl for 5 h under the same
conditions leaved the starting compound intact. Chlorin-
ation in the two-phase system resulted in the formation
of two products, one of which is acid 5, while the other is
its methyl ester 7. 1-Carboxymethyl-5-fluoro-6-hydroxy-
5-nitro-5,6-dihydrouracil (6) was obtained in 84% yield
upon nitration of compound 3 with the H2SO4—HNO3
mixture at 0—10 С for 5 h (see Scheme 4).
flow rate of the nebulizing gas (nitrogen) was 2.5 L min–1
.
Elemental analysis was carried out using a EURO-3000 elemen-
tal analyzer.
5-Bromo-1-carboxymethyl-5-fluoro-6-hydroxy-5,6-dihydro-
uracil (4). To a mixture of 1-carboxymethyl-5-fluorouracil (2)
(0.10 g, 0.53 mmol) or 5-fluoro-1-(methoxycarbonyl)methyl-
uracil (3) (0.11 g, 0.53 mmol) and KBr (0.13 g, 1.06 mmol) in
20% H2SO4 (2.30 mL), 33% H2O2 (0.16 mL, 1.59 mmol) was
added dropwise, and the resulting mixture was stirred for 5 h at
room temperature. Then, the reaction mixture was diluted with
water and extracted with diethyl ether. The combined extracts
were washed with water, dried over Na2SO4, the solvent was
evaporated, the product was re-precipitated from an acetone-
hexane (1 : 7) mixture. A white powder was obtained. In the case
of substrate 2, the yield of 4 was 67% (0.10 g), upon the twofold
prolongation of the reaction, the yield increased to 83% (0.12 g).
In the case of substrate 3, the yield of 4 was 86% (0.13 g). 1H NMR
(DMSO-d6) δ: 3.97 (d, 1 Н, Ha(7), J = 17.40 Hz); 4.15 (d, 1 H,
Hb(7), J = 17.40 Hz); 5.45 (d, 1 H, H(6), J = 4.50 Hz); 7.35
(br.s, 1 H, OH); 11.25 (br.s, 1 H, H(3)). 13С NMR (DMSO-d6)
δ: 48.19 (s, C(7)); 83.77 (d, C(6), J = 26.40 Hz); 91.12 (d, C(5),
J = 199.95 Hz); 150.88 (s, C(2)); 163.84 (d, C(4), J = 18.90 Hz);
169.89 (s, C(8)). MS, m/z (Irel (%)): 283 [M – H]– (90), 285
(80); 567 [2 M – H]– (32), 569 (100), 571 (42). Found (%):
С, 24.54; Н, 2.07; Br, 29.03; N, 9.85. С6H6BrFN2O5. Calculat-
ed (%): С, 25.28; Н, 2.12; Br, 28.03; N, 9.83.
Scheme 4
Compound
X
Br
Cl
NO2
Cl
R
H
H
H
Me
Yield (%)
4
5
6
7
86
—
84
—
Reagents and conditions: i. KBr (2 eq.), 20% H2SO4, 33% H2O2
(3 eq.), ~20 C, 5 h, or ii. НCl (3 eq.), 33% H2O2 (4 eq.), СН2Cl2,
~20 C, 5 h, or iii. H2SO4, 67% HNO3, 020 C, 5 h.
1-Carboxymethyl-5-chloro-5-fluoro-6-hydroxy-5,6-dihydro-
uracil (5). To 1-carboxymethyl-5-fluorouracil (2) (0.10 g,
0.53 mmol) or 5-fluoro-1-(methoxycarbonyl)methyluracil (3)
(0.11 g, 0.53 mmol) in СН2Cl2 (1.00 mL), 34% HCl (0.15 mL,
1.60 mmol) was added under stirring at room temperature,
then, 33% H2O2 (0.21 mL, 2.12 mmol) was added dropwise,
and the reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature
for 5 h. Then, the reaction mixture was diluted with water
and extracted with diethyl ether. The combined extracts were
washed with water, dried over Na2SO4, the solvent was evapo-
rated, the product was re-precipitated from a mixture of ace-
tone with hexane (1 : 7). A white powder was obtained. In the
case of substrate 2, the yield of 5 was 78% (0.10 g). In the case
of substrate 3, the total yield of 5 and 7 (in the 7 : 3 ratio) was
0.13 g. 1H NMR (DMSO-d6) δ: 3.95 (d, 1 Н, Ha(7), J = 17.50 Hz);
4.10 (d, 1 H, Hb(7), J = 17.50 Hz); 5.35 (d, 1 H, H(6),
J = 1.70 Hz); 7.60 (br.s, 1 H, ОН); 11.90 (br.s, 1 H, H(3)).
13С NMR (DMSO-d6) δ: 48.44 (s, C(7)); 82.93 (d, C(6),
J = 27.67 Hz); 97.30 (d, C(5), J = 255.29 Hz); 150.84 (s, C(2));
163.04 (d, C(4), J = 27.66 Hz); 168.73 (s, C(8)). MS, m/z
(Irel (%)): 239 [M – H]– (100), 241 (30); 479 [2 M – H]– (84),
481 (58), 483 (5%). Found (%): С, 29.11; Н, 2.39; Cl, 30.01;
N, 14.81. С6H6ClFN2O5. Calculated (%): С, 29.96; Н, 2.51;
Cl, 14.74; N, 11.64.
In conclusion, 5-halogeno-6-hydroxy and 6-hydroxy-
5-nitro derivatives of uracil were synthesized for the first
time by oxidative halogenation and nitration of 1-carboxy-
methyl-5-fluorouracil and its methyl ester with the purpose
of their further involvement in a study of the dependence
between the structure and antiviral activity in the series of
uracil derivatives.
Experimental
The 1Н and 13С NMR spectra were recorded at a constant
temperature of 298 K using a Bruker Avance-III 500 pulsed
spectrometer operating at frequencies of 500.13 MHz (1H) and
125.76 MHz (13C) and equipped with a 5 mm broad-band mul-
tinuclear (PABBO) probe and the Z-axis gradient unit. Solvent
signals were used as references. The 13С NMR spectra with
proton decoupling were recorded using the following parameters:
the 29.8 kHz spectral window, the 3.2 s exciting pulse (30)
duration, the 2 s relaxation delay, the number of points was 64 K,
the number of scans was 512—2048. The DEPT-90 and
DEPT-135 experiments were performed to assist the interpreta-
tion of the 13С NMR spectra. Two-dimensional spectra were
obtained using the standard multipulse sequences available in
the spectrometer software. Mass spectra were recorded using
a Shimadzu LCMS-2010 EV spectrometer with quadrupole mass
analyzer (manual syringe injection, mixed acetonitrile-chloro-
form solutions of samples, the 95 : 5 acetonitrile-water mixture
5-Chloro-5-fluoro-6-hydroxy-1-(methoxycarbonyl)methyl-
5,6-dihydrouracil (7). 1H NMR (DMSO-d6) δ: 3.66 (s, 3 Н,
Н (9)); 3.99 (d, 1 Н, Ha(7), J = 17.50 Hz); 4.20 (d, 1 H, Hb(7),
J = 17.50 Hz); 5.36 (d, 1 H, H(6), J = 1.70 Hz); 7.65 (br.s, 1 H,
ОН); 11.38 (d, 1 H, H(3), J = 3.46 Hz). 13С NMR (DMSO-d6)