J. Catal a´ n et al. / Chemical Physics Letters 419 (2006) 164–167
165
absorption band. Such complexes [14] have also allowed
the identification of the molecular structure responsible
for the phosphorescence of 7AI with its onset at 430 nm,
which was first detected by Kasha et al. [1]. Sekiya et al.
spectro fluorimeter, using a Suprasil quartz cell of 1 cm
light path. The sample temperature was controlled by an
Oxford DN1704 cryostat equipped with an ITC4 controller
interfaced to the spectrophotometer. The cryostat was
purged with dried nitrogen 99.99% pure.
[
7
15] studied heterodimers between 3-Me-7-azaindole and
-azaindole under free-jet conditions and interpreted their
7-Azaindole was obtained in 99% purity from Sigma
and recrystallized in spectroscopic-grade cyclohexane
twice. 3-methyl-7-azaindole was synthesized from 2-pyr-
idylhydrazine and propionaldehyde to obtain the corre-
sponding hydrazone. This hydrazone was refluxed with
diethylene glycol in an inert atmosphere [29]. The resulting
residue was purified by silica gel column chromatography
(eluent: hexane/ethyl acetate 6/4 and dichloromethane/
ethyl acetate 6/4) yielding 3-methyl-7-azaindole (23%) with
a purity over 99%. All samples used were obtained from
freshly made 2-methylbutane (2 MB) solutions containing
results as evidence for a double proton transfer in the gas
phase. On the other hand, Catal a´ n and de Paz [7] inter-
preted the results for the heterodimer of 4-Me-7-azaindole
and 7AI in the condensed phase as evidence of a single pro-
ton transfer.
This paper analyses in theoretical and experimental
terms the dimer symmetry loss mechanism involving the
formation of heterodimers and rationalizes reported infor-
mation about the topic. Specifically, it deals with the het-
erodimer formed by one molecule of 7-azaindole and
another of 3-methyl-7-azaindole, which was previously
studied under free-jet conditions by Sekiya et al. [15]. Their
conclusions raise three pivotal questions, namely:
ꢀ
4
a 10 M concentration of indole residue. The 2 MB sol-
vent was Uvasol-grade and supplied by Merck.
3. Results and discussion
(
a) If the spectroscopic behaviour of (3M7AI-7AI) dimer
is so similar to that of 7AI dimer, how can simply
This section initially examines the theoretical data avail-
2
substituting a proton at position 3, possibly shift the
able for the heterodimer (3M7AI-7AI) in order to confirm
whether the electronic excitation is localized and its impli-
cations on the proton transfer process in the excited hetero-
dimer. Then, it deals with its absorption and emission
spectra in relation to the type of proton transfer it
undergoes.
0
–0 component of the S ! S transition by as much
0
1
ꢀ1
as 1666 cm
?
(
b) If the electronic excitation is delocalized on the two
molecular halves of the C2h dimer of 7AI, but only
on one in (3M7AI-7AI), how can both dimers undergo
an identical double proton transfer process?
(
c) According to Sekiya et al., ‘‘the fluorescence intensity
of (3M7AI-7AI) was too weak to measure the dis-
persed fluorescence (DF) spectrum’’ Why?
3.1. The 0–0 components of the S ! S transition
0
1
Sekiya et al. [15] obtained fluorescence excitation (FE)
spectrum for (3M7AI-7AI) heterodimer near the 0–0
region of the S ! S transition (specifically, from 30560
0
1
ꢀ1
2
. Theoretical and experimental section
to 31100 cm ) by tuning only the emission visible through
a Toshiba Y45 glass filter. Based on such spectrum and, by
All computations were done within the framework of
analogy with those for 7AI , they assigned the 0–0 compo-
nent of the (3M7AI-7AI) to the peak at 30585 cm .
2
ꢀ
1
the Density Functional Theory (DFT) and the Time
Dependent Density Functional Theory (TDDFT), using
the software Turbomole v. 5.26, which was developed by
the Quantum Chemistry Group of the University of Kar-
lsruhe (Germany) [16]. Full geometry optimization of the
ground and excited electronic states was done by using
the hybrid functional B3LYP [17–19] as implemented in
Turbomole [20]. The TZVP basis set [21] was used. Excited
states were studied at the TDDFT level [22] as imple-
mented in Turbomole [23–27]. Previous studies had shown
this methodology to be accurate with photoexcited mole-
cules [7,9,28].
The theoretical value for the 0–0 component of the
S ! S transition in (3M7AI-7AI) as computed at the
0
1
TDDTF level and corrected for the zero-point energy is
ꢀ
1
28457 cm . This value is located at much lower energy,
ꢀ1
2100 cm , than the experimental value obtained under
ꢀ1
free-jet conditions [15], 30585 cm . This great disagree-
ment between the theoretical and experimental results,
for the heterodimer 3M7AI-7AI appears to be remarkable
ꢀ
1
if we bring about the small deviation of only 900 cm for
the C2h 7AI dimer, when comparing the experimental
ꢀ1
ꢀ1
(32252 cm ) and the theoretical values (31349 cm ).
The 0–0 components for the S ! S electronic transi-
As recently shown by the authors [7], the C dimer of 7-
0
1
s
0
tions were calculated from the fully optimized geometry
for each state, which was corrected for the zero point
energy as computed from the vibrational frequencies for
the compound.
azaindole produces a first excited electronic state a with its
ꢀ
1
0–0 component 484 cm below that of the 1Bu state in the
C2h dimer. Such a state is responsible for the above-
described red shift in the onset of the first absorption band
seemingly occurring in 7-azaindole dimer [12,13]. As shown
below, this is also the case for the (3M7AI-7AI) heterodi-
mer, and probably, what Sekiya et al. have reported might
UV–visible spectra were recorded on a Cary-5 spectro-
photometer and corrected fluorescence spectra were
obtained by using a calibrated Aminco-Bowman AB2