increase the substrate concentration to observe a Michaelis–
Menten dependence.
In conclusion, LMOGs based on octyl hexonamides were
found to exhibit electroosmosis, even in slab gels. This is the
first demonstration of electroosmosis in an LMOG. This
phenomenon is both novel and unexpected. Intuitively, elec-
troosmosis could not be driven by uncharged moieties. How-
ever, post priori, the occurrence of EOF can be readily
explained by the supramolecular structure of LMOGs which
imposes environmental constraints which spread the proton
dissociation susceptibility of the very same gelator function-
ality (i.e., the a-hydroxyl) over a wide pH range when it is
exposed to different solid environments. This structure can
similarly explain the somewhat surprising existence of enzy-
matic activity within the gel. The gelator, which like most
LMOG gelators is a surface active agent having distinct
hydrophobic and hydrophilic parts, should have denatured
the enzyme. However, this does not happen due to the
supramolecular structure which binds and hinders the mobility
of the surfactant gelator and thus interferes with its denaturing
activity.
Fig. 4 Electropherograms of pyrogallol (23 min) with N-benzyl-1-
(1-naphthyl)-ethylamine as internal standard (8 min) in (a) a plain gel
capillary; and (b) a capillary with added HRP and hydrogen peroxide.
Capillary effective length 42 cm; driving force 20 kV.
recent.10 Since the presence of electroosmosis in the gel allows
the flow of uncharged compounds through the capillary, it is
possible to use the gel-filled capillary as a packed bed reactor.
To date non-destructive accessibility to the gel interior could
be attained only by diffusion or electrophoresis. The first is a
slow process and the latter is limited to charged species. This
communication expands the possibilities of enzyme immobili-
zation and paves the way for LMOG applications requiring
fast transport of analytes, reactants or products between the
interior of LMOG gels and their surroundings.
The gelator, hexyl-galactonamide was tailored to meet the
needs of two model applications. First it was used as a
stationary phase for electrochromatography. Dichlorophenols
were separated based on the different interactions with the gel
resulting from the location of the chloride groups relative to
the hydroxyl. The gelator was further used as the solid phase
of a packed bed bioreactor hosting HRP inside a fused silica
capillary. Pyrogallol was oxidized by hydrogen peroxide cat-
alyzed by the immobilized HRP. The unique properties of
LMOGs and especially their thixotropy, reversibility and
porosity combined with the accessibility due to electroosmosis
thus provide an environment suitable for many analytical
applications, two of which were demonstrated here.
In order to demonstrate this idea, horseradish peroxidase
(HRP) and hydrogen peroxide were added to the gel, and
pyrogallol was injected into the capillary along with a refer-
ence species N-benzyl-1-(1-naphthyl)-ethylamine. The conver-
sion was calculated from the ratio of the pyrogallol peak to the
reference peak in relation to the ratio in a blank run with no
enzyme. All runs were carried out at pH 5 since at higher pH
the stronger EOF causes some instability in the gel. A run at
20 kV is shown in Fig. 4. The top window shows a run without
HRP. The first peak is the N-benzyl-1-(1-naphthyl)-ethyl-
amine internal standard, and the second is pyrogallol which
amounts to 46% of the internal standard peak. In the lower
window is the run with HRP in which the pyrogallol peak has
been reduced to 8% of the internal standard peak. This
amounts to an 83% conversion. The oxidation of pyrogallol
to purpurogallin is a multi-step reaction with several inter-
mediates.11 Because the reaction is taking place under electro-
phoretic conditions, the products are formed at different
locations along the capillary and therefore do not emerge as
chromatographic peaks, rather they are smeared through the
capillary as seen by the rise in baseline starting a few minutes
before the pyrogallol peak. No reaction (or decrease of the
pyrogallol peak) was observed for thermally denatured HRP.
The oxidation of pyrogallol is first order with respect to
each of pyrogallol, peroxidase and peroxide at low substrate
concentrations.12 The effective residence time of pyrogallol in
the reactor was changed by varying the voltage and/or the
capillary length, keeping all other parameters constant. The
data fit the expected logarithmic relationship for first order
reactions (R2 ¼ 0.991). The observed rate constant for the
We gratefully acknowledge the financial support of the
Israel Ministry of Science.
Notes and references
1. M. George and R. G. Weiss, Acc. Chem. Res., 2006, 39, 489;
N. M. Sangeetha and U. Maitra, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2005, 34, 821;
M. de Loos, B. L. Feringa and J. van Esch, Eur. J. Org. Chem.,
2005, 3615.
2. P. Mukhopadhyay, Y. Iwashita, M. Shirakawa, S. Kawano,
N. Fujita and S. Shinkai, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2006, 45, 1592.
3. A. Friggeri, B. L. Feringa and J. Van Esch, J. Controlled Release,
2004, 97, 241.
4. Q. Wang, Z. Yang, X. Zhang, X. Xiao, C. K. Chang and B. Xu,
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2007, 46, 4285.
5. S. Kiyonaka, K. Sada, I. Yoshimura, S. Shinkai, N. Kato and
I. Hamachi, Nat. Mater., 2004, 3, 58.
6. S. Mizrahi, J. Gun, Z. G. Kipervaser and O. Lev, Anal. Chem.,
2004, 76, 5399.
7. J. H. Furhop, P. Schnieder, E. Boekema and W. Helfrich, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 1988, 110, 2861.
8. M. A. Porter, J. R. Hall, J. C. Locke, J. H. Jensen and
P. A. Molina, Proteins, 2006, 63, 621.
9. CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, ed. R. C. West and
M. J. Astle, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 63rd edn, 1982.
10. Q. Wang, Z. Yang, L. Wang, M. Ma and B. Xu, Chem. Commun.,
2007, 1032.
enzyme and peroxide concentrations used is 0.0677 minꢁ1
.
11. K. Miyazaki, S. Arai, T. Iwamoto, T. Masaru and A. Tomoda,
Tohoku J. Exp. Med., 2004, 203, 319.
12. M. K. Mahanti, Afinidad, 1991, 48, 59.
Fig. 2 of the ESIw shows the characteristic logarithmic con-
version–retention time dependence. We did not attempt to
ꢀc
This journal is The Royal Society of Chemistry 2008
2916 | Chem. Commun., 2008, 2914–2916