JBIC Journal of Biological Inorganic Chemistry
1
837, 785, 742, 730, 623, 570, 507. H-NMR (300 MHz,
CDCl3): δ=13.92 ppm (s, 2H, OH), δ=8.37 ppm (s, 2H,
CH=N), δ = 7.25-6.80 ppm (m, 6H, ArH), δ = 3.91 ppm
(s, 6H, OCH3), δ = 3.76–3.71 ppm (td, 4H, N–CH2),
δ = 2.16–2.06 ppm (q, 2H, CH2–CH2–CH2). UV–Vis
(CH3OH): λmax/nm (ε/dm3 mol−1 cm−1)=263 (15,280), 296
(6196), 326 (3324), 420 (3321).
gents and leaving the product as a brown solid, which
was fltered, washed with cold methanol and dried
over P4O10. Yield 0.12 g (52%).
Anal. C19H20Cu2N4O10 (591.47 g mol−1) Calcd (%):
C, 38.12; H, 3.50; N, 9.36. Found (%): C, 37.82; H,
3.34; N, 9.26. IR (cm−1): 2993, 2949, 2925, 1627, 1613,
1559, 1519, 1494, 1477, 1466, 1440, 1422, 1409, 1384,
1353, 1335, 1307, 1297, 1245, 1233, 1199, 1173, 1101,
1079, 1070, 1015, 1011, 990, 983, 955, 934, 894, 855,
839, 805, 784, 762, 745. UV–Vis (CH3OH): λmax/nm (ε/
dm3 mol−1 cm−1)=226 (47,027), 279 (24,284), 360 (6360),
608 (78).
Synthesis of [CuL] (1)
H2L (0.66 g, 2 mmol) was dissolved in methanol (140 mL)
and placed in an electrochemical cell with a sacrifcial cop-
per anode and an inert platinum cathode using Et4NBr as
electrolyte. The intensity value was set up at 40 mA and the
output was 100 V. The reaction time was 2 h and 41 min
at room temperature. The green solid obtained was fltered
of, methanol washed and vacuum dried. The Ef value was
0.5 mol F–1 which corresponds to the oxidation of metallic
copper to Cu(II). Yield 0.48 g (60%). Anal. C19H20CuN2O4
(403.90 g mol–1) Calcd (%): C, 56.50; H, 4.99; N, 6.94.
Found (%): C, 56.42; H, 4.91; N, 6.94. IR (cm−1): 3431,
3053, 2999, 2941, 2830, 1629, 1545, 1471, 1441, 1403,
1327, 1243, 1221, 1167, 1101, 1082, 1008, 977, 959, 939,
857, 786, 743, 619, 560, 452. UV–Vis (CH3OH): λmax/nm
(ε/dm3 mol−1 cm−1)=282 (24,773), 371 (7172), 550 (197).
Synthesis of [CuMnL(NO3)2] (3)
reported procedure [22]. The mononuclear complex (1)
(0.10 g, 0.5 mmol) was dissolved in MeOH:MeCN (1:4)
(125 mL), Mn(NO3)2·4H2O (0.06 g, 0.5 mmol) was added
and the resulting solution was stirred for 0.5 h. After 4 days
of slow evaporation at low temperature, a dark green powder
and single crystals suitable for X-ray data collection were
obtained. The product was fltered of, washed with cold
methanol and dried in vacuum. Yield 0.19 g (66%). Anal.
C19H20CuMnN4O10 (582.87 g mol–1) Calcd (%): C, 39.15;
H, 3.46; N, 9.61. Found (%): C, 39.36; H, 3.58; N, 9.27. IR
(cm−1): 1617, 1561, 1472, 1445, 1384, 1302, 1236, 1172,
1101, 1073, 1030, 988, 953, 855, 786, 745, 638, 574, 539,
466. UV–Vis (CH3OH): λmax/nm (ε/dm3 mol−1 cm−1)=226
(44,254), 276 (19,559), 356 (4630), 618 (33).
Synthesis of [Cu2L(NO3)2] (2)
Three diferent procedures have been followed for the syn-
thesis of the title compound.
(i) A methanolic solution (40 mL) of Cu(NO3)2·3H2O
(0.80 g, 3.3 mmol) was added to an stirring solution
of H2L (0.36 g, 1.1 mmol) in methanol (15 mL). The
reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for
12 h. The solid appeared as a brown powder that was
fltered of and washed with methanol. Single crys-
tals suitable for X-ray data collection were obtained
by slow evaporation of the fltered solution. Yield
0.41 g (65%).
Physical methods and materials
All chemicals of analytical grade were purchased from
Sigma-Aldrich and used without further purifcation.
Elemental analysis (carbon, hydrogen and nitrogen) were
carried out by the Microanalytical Service of the Universi-
dad Complutense de Madrid (UCM) using a LECO CHNS-
932 analyser. FTIR spectra (4000–650 cm−1) of solid powder
samples were recorded using a Perking Elmer spectropho-
tometer with a universal ATR accessory and FTIR KBr-
dispersion spectra (4000–400 cm−1) were recorded using a
THERMO NICOLET 200 spectrophotometer. Mass spectra
were recorded using electrospray ionization (ESI–MS) in
DMSO and MeOH with the HCTultraPTM Discovery Sys-
tem mass spectrometer equipped with a conventional ESI
source. 1H-NMR spectra were collected in the UCM Nuclear
Magnetic Resonance Service using a Burker AVIII300
(300 MHz) spectrophotometer. Electronic spectra in oxygen-
ated methanol (200–1000 nm) were registered in a Cary-5G
spectrophotometer. The measurements of the catalytic oxi-
dation of 3,5-di-tert-butylcatechol (3,5-DTBC) were carried
(ii) H2L (0.17 g, 0.5 mmol) and Cu(NO3)2·3H2O (0.14 g,
0.56 mmol) were dissolved in methanol (105 mL)
in an electrochemical cell with a sacrifcial copper
anode and an inert platinum cathode. The intensity
value was set up at 40 mA and the output was 100 V.
The reaction time was 41 min at room temperature.
The product was fltered of, washed with methanol
and dried. The Ef value was 0.5 mol F–1. Yield 0.13 g
(43%).
(iii) A solid mixture of Cu(NO3)2·3H2O (0.10 g,
0.4 mmol) and H2L (0.14 g, 0.4 mmol) was ground
for 30 min at room temperature. The mixture was
suspended in methanol to extract the excess of rea-
1 3