1-Hydroxy-2-(2-hydroxyphenyl)imidazoles
Russ. Chem. Bull., Int. Ed., Vol. 68, No. 3, March, 2019
637
found: m/z 247.1077 [M + H]+; C13H14N2O3; calculated:
[М + H]+ = 247.1083.
and within the framework of the State task No. 8/18 of the
State Research Center of Virology and Biotechnology
VECTOR.
2-(2-Hydroxyphenyl)-6,6-dimethyl-3,5,6,7-tetrahydro-4H-
benzimidazol-4-one (6c). A mixture of 1-hydroxyimidazole 1c
(0.54 g, 2.0 mmol) and triphenylphosphine (0.84 g, 3.2 mmol)
in glacial acetic acid (4 mL) was stirred at reflux for 4 h, cooled
to room temperature, and diluted with diethyl ether (10 mL).
The precipitate was filtered off, washed on a filter with diethyl
ether, and purified by refluxing in diethyl ether. Chromato-
graphically pure product 6c was obtained as pale-yellow powder
with m.p. 282—284 °C in a yield of 0.42 g (82%). 1H NMR
(DMSO-d6), δ: 13.56 and 13.26 (both br.s, 1 H, NH); 12.52 (br.s,
1 H, OH); 8.11 and 7.88 (both br.d, 1 H, H(2´)); 7.33 (t, 1 H,
Ar, J = 7.8 Hz); 6.90—7.04 (m, 2 H, Ar); 2.84 and 2.78 (both s,
2 H, CH2); 2.42 (s, 2 H, CH2); 1.10 (s, 6 H, 2 CH3). 13C NMR
(DMSO-d6), δ: 188.4; 172.0; 157.1; 131.5/131.4*; 131.2;
128.8/128.7*; 125.6; 119.1; 117.0; 112.3; 51.6; 35.5; 28.0; 21.0.
MS, found: m/z 257.1285 [M + H]+; C15H16N2O2; calculated:
[М + H]+ = 257.1290.
Evaluation of antiviral activity. Antiviral activity and toxicity
of the synthesized compounds were evaluated in Vero cell culture.
Vaccinia virus (Copenhagen strain), as a typical representative
of orthopoxviruses, was used as model. A Vero cell monolayer
was grown in wells of 96-well plates. Solutions of the compounds
to be tested were prepared in dimethyl sulfoxide at a concentra-
tion of 20 mg mL–1. These solutions were used to prepare a series
of dilutions in a culture medium. These dilutions were placed in
wells of the plates containing a cell monolayer. In one-half of the
wells, the virus was added, and another half was used to evaluate
the toxicity of the compounds. The dilutions were made in five-
or three-fold steps; the initial concentration in the wells of the
plates was 100 μg mL–1. Commercially available Cidofovir
(Vistide) purchased from Gilead Sciences Inc. (USA) was em-
ployed as the control. Cidofovir proved to be active against or-
thopoxviruses in in vitro and in vivo experiments.3
After incubation for four days, the vital dye neutral red that
is absorbed only by living cells was added to the wells. In the
wells, in which the cells are destroyed by the virus or damaged
by toxicity of the compound, the dye uptake does not occur. The
monolayer was washed with a physiological solution to remove
the unabsorbed dye. Then a lysis buffer was added to the wells to
dissolve the dye absorbed by the cells. The absorbance of the
solutions in the wells was measured with an E-Max microplate
reader (Molecular Devices, USA) at a wavelength of 490 nm.
The absorbance is proportional to the number of surviving cells
and characterizes the antiviral activity and toxicity of the com-
pound compared to the virus control and the cell control, re-
spectively. The data were processed with the Soft Max Pro 4.0
software, which calculated the 50% toxic concentration
(TC50, μg mL–1) and the 50% virus-inhibitory concentration
(IC50, μg mL–1). The selectivity index (SI) defined as SI =
= TC50/IC50 was determined based on the values of TC50 and
IC50. The value of SI smaller than 8 is regarded as unacceptable for
compounds that can be considered as promising antiviral agents.3
References
1. D. A. Henderson, T. V. Inglesby, J. G. Bartlett, M. S. Ascher,
E. Eitzen, P. B. Jahrling, J. Hauer, M. Layton, J. McDade,
M. T. Osterholm, T. O´Toole, G. Parker, T. Perl, P. K.
Russell, K. Tonat, J. Am. Med. Ass., JAMA, 1999, 281, 2127.
2. P. D. Anderson, G. Bokor, J. Pharm. Pract., 2012, 25, 521.
3. O. Yu. Mazurkov, A. S. Kabanov, L. N. Shishkina, A. A.
Sergeev, M. O. Skarnovich, N. I. Bormotov, M. A. Skarno-
vich, A. S. Ovchinnikova, K. A. Titova, D. O. Galahova, L. E.
Bulychev, A. A. Sergeev, O. S. Taranov, B. A. Selivanov,
A. Ya. Tikhonov, E. L. Zavjalov, A. P. Agafonov, A. N. Ser-
geev, J. Gen. Virol., 2016, 97, 1229.
4. G. G. Allan, C. S. Chopra, T. Mattila, Pestic. Sci., 1972,
3, 153.
5. M. Witschel, Bioorg. Med. Chem., 2009, 17, 4221.
6. T. B. Stensbøl, P. Uhlmann, S. Morel, B. L. Eriksen,
J. Felding, H. Kromann, M. B. Hermit, J. R. Greenwood,
H. Braüner-Osborne, U. Madsen, F. Junager, P. Krogsgaard-
Larsen, M. Begtrup, P. Vedsø, J. Med. Chem., 2002, 45, 19.
7. R. B. da Silva, V. B. Loback, K. Salomão, S. L. de Castro,
J. L. Wardell, S. M. S. V. Wardell, T. E. M. M. Costa, C. Penido,
M. G. M. de Oliveira Henriques, S. A. Carvalho, E. F. da
Silva, C. A. M. Fraga, Molecules, 2013, 18, 3445.
8. C. Midrier, S. Montel, R. Brown, K. Haaf, L. Willms, A. van
der Lee, J.-N. Volle, J.-L. Pirat, D. Virieux, RSC Adv., 2014,
4, 23770.
9. P. A. Nikitina, I. I. Tkach, E. S. Knyazhanskaya, M. B.
Gottikh, V. P. Perevalov, Pharm. Chem. J., 2016, 50, 513.
10. D. Dimova, P. Iyer, M. Vogt, F. Totzke, M. H. G. Kubbutat,
C. Schächtele, S. Laufer, J. Bajorath, J. Med. Chem., 2012,
55, 110 67.
11. S. Chen, T. Zhang, J. Wang, F. Wang, H. Niu, C. Wu, S. Wang,
Eur. J. Med. Chem., 2015, 103, 343.
12. T. Zhang, Y. Lv, Y. Lei, D. Liu, Y. Feng, J. Zhao, S. Chen,
F. Meng, S. Wang, Eur. J. Med. Chem., 2018, 146, 668.
13. P. A. Nikitina, A. S. Peregudov, T. Yu. Koldaeva, L. G.
Kuz´mina, E. I. Adiulin, I. I. Tkach, V. P. Perevalov,
Tetrahedron, 2015, 71, 5217.
14. P. A. Nikitina, L. G. Kuz´mina, V. P. Perevalov, I. I. Tkach,
Tetrahedron, 2013, 69, 3249.
15. A. S. Shawali, A. A. Fahmi, Ind. J. Chem., 1975, 13(2), 105.
16. P. A. Nikitina, E. V. Frolova, V. P. Perevalov, I. I. Tkach, Izv.
Vuz. Khim. Khim. Tekhnol. [Izv. Vuz. Russ. J. Chem. Chem.
Technol.], 2014, 57, 33 (in Russian).
Received October 24, 2018;
in revised form November 11, 2018;
accepted November 14, 2018
This study was financially supported by the Russian
Foundation for Basic Research (Project No. 18-33-00442)