zene (ANB), 3ANB, and 4ANB. The E1°′ value for 24DNT we
determined via pulse radiolysis and the one computed from
the LFER were only 9.3% different (Table 1). Hofstetter et al.
used 4NT, 4CNB, 4ANB, 1,3-dinitrobenzene, and 1,4-dinitro-
benzene to develop an excellent log-linear LFER fit (26). The
E1°′ values for 2ADNT, 4ADNT, and DANT from our pulse
radiolysis experiments and the LFER were in close agreement
(6.5, 4.2, and 2.6% difference for 2ADNT, 4ADNT, and DANT,
respectively; Table 1). The E1°′ value we measured for TNT
deviated by 19% from the value reported by Hofstetter et al.
(26). These authors supplied electrons for TNT reduction by
a H2S/ jugalone system. Because the reduction rate of TNT
was 2-4 orders of magnitude faster than for ADNT and DANT,
it is possible that the reduction rate was limited by the
transport of electrons from H2S via jugalone to TNT rather
than the kinetics of the one-electron transfer, leading to an
erroneous low estimate for E1°′. We believe that our meas-
urement for E1°′ may be more accurate because the method
is more direct. Except for TNT, E1°′ results presented in this
study are very consistent with previously reported values.
Acknowledgments
We thank the U.S. Department of Energy Radiation Labora-
tory at the University of Notre Dame, especially Dr. Dan
Meisel and Tim Schatz, for operation of the linear electron
accelerator and assistance in the E1°′ measurements.
Literature Cited
(1) Kaplan, C. L.; Kaplan, A. M. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1982, 16,
566-573.
(2) Hathaway, J. A. In Chemical Industry Institute of Toxicology Series;
Rickert, D. E., Ed.; Hemisphere Publishing: New York, 1985; pp
262-269.
(3) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Approaches for the
remediation of federal facility sites contaminated with explosive
or radioactive wastes; EPA/ 625/ R-93/ 013; U.S. Government
Printing Office: Washington, DC, 1993.
(4) Bradley, P. M.; Chappelle, F. H.; Landmeyer, J. E.; Schumacher,
J. G. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1994, 60, 2170-2175.
(5) Boopathy, R.; Manning, J.; Kulpa, C. Water Environ. Res. 1998,
70, 80-86.
(6) Esteve-Nu´ n˜ ez, A.; Ramos, J. L. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1998, 32
(23), 3802-3808.
Correlations between the E1°′ of nitroarenes and quinones
and reduction rates by a variety of catalysts have been
reported with slope values that vary from 0.22 to 1.25 (Table
3). On the basis of the Marcus equation, the slope is largely
a function of the solvent reorganization energy, so it is not
surprising that slopes vary with different catalysts (35). LFERs
with the lowest slopes were likely limited by precursor
formation as 0.22 was obtained using an aqueous suspension
of minerals as electron donors (25). Slopes near 1 were
obtained only in solutions with dissolved electron donors
without enzyme mediation, a situation unlikely to exhibit
precursor formation limitation (21, 22, 26). Glaus et al. (41)
also obtained a slope near one (0.985) with Streptomyces
exudates, although boiling of the solution did not change
results, suggesting that low molecular weight dissolved
compounds were driving nitro group reduction. LFERs for
enzyme-catalyzed reductions exhibit slopes between 0 and
1, indicating possible kinetic limitation from precursor
formation (20, 17, 24). Similarly, we obtained a slope of 0.509,
indicating that precursor formation may limit overall reaction
rates. Bryant and DeLuca measured a very similar slope
(0.475) with an Enterobacter cloacae nitroreductase (17). This
enzyme has a bound FMN fraction, exhibits FMN activity,
and is likely related to the employed NAD(P)H:FMN oxido-
reductase (17).
(7) McCormick, N. G.; Fecherry, F. E.; Levinson, H. S. Appl. Environ.
Microbiol. 1976, 31, 949-958.
(8) Preuss, A.; Fimpel, J.; Diekert, G. Arch. Microbiol. 1993, 159,
345-353.
(9) Spain, J. C. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 1995, 49, 523-555.
(10) Hughes, J. B.; Wang, C. Y.; Bhadra, R.; Richardson, A.; Bennett,
G. N.; Rudolph, F. B. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 1998, 17 (3), 343-
348.
(11) Hawari, J.; Halasz, A.; Paquet, L.; Zhou, E.; Spencer, B.;
Ampleman, G.; Thiboutot, S. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1998, 64
(6), 2200-2206.
(12) Daun, G.; Lenke, H.; Reuss, M.; Knackmuss, H.-J. Environ. Sci.
Technol. 1998, 32 (13), 1956-1963.
(13) Cerniglia, C. E.; Somerville, C. C. In Biodegradation of Nitroaro-
matic Compounds; Spain, J. C., Ed.; Plenum Press: New York,
1995; pp 99-115.
(14) Fiorella, P. D.; Spain, J. C. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1997, 63 (8),
2007-2015.
(15) Kalafut, T.; Wales, M. E.; Rastogi, V. K.; Naumova, R. P.; Zaripova,
S. K.; Wild, J. R. Curr. Microbiol. 1998, 36, 45-54.
(16) Schenzle, A.; Lenke, H.; Spain, J. C.; Knackmuss, H.-J. Appl.
Environ. Microbiol. 1999, 65 (6), 2317-2323.
(17) Bryant, C.; DeLuca, M. J. Biol. Chem. 1991, 266 (7), 4119-4125.
(18) French, C. E.; Nicklin, S.; Bruce, N. C. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
1998, 64 (8), 2864-2868.
(19) Huang, S.; Lindahl, P. A.; Hughes, J. B. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
2000, 66 (4), 1474-1478.
(20) Orna, M. V.; Mason, R. P. J. Biol. Chem. 1989, 264 (21), 12379-
12384.
(21) Schwarzenbach, R. P.; Stierli, R.; Lanz, K.; Zeyer, J. Environ. Sci.
Technol. 1990, 24 (10), 1566-1574.
(22) Dunnivant, F. M.; Schwarzenbach, R. P. Environ. Sci. Technol.
1992, 26 (11), 2133-2141.
All reported catalysts likely mediate one-electron transfers
except E. cloacae nitroreductase, which mediates two-
electron transfers (17) (Table 3). It is suspected that NAD(P)H:
FMN oxidoreductase also transfers two electrons because
oxygen sensitivity was not observed (results not shown), and
when reducing FMN, the one-electron reduced flavin was
not detected (results not shown). Nevertheless, log-linear
relationships between k and E1°′ were apparent in this
research and in Bryant and DeLuca (17). This may suggest
a correlation between E1°′ and E2°′ or that even for enzymes
that transfer in two electron increments, the first electron-
transfer governs the overall reaction kinetics.
(23) Butler, J.; Hoey, B. M. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1993, 1161, 73-
78.
(24) Ce´nas, N.; Anusevicius, Z.; Bironaite´, D.; Bachmanova, G. I.
Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 1994, 315 (2), 400-406.
(25) Klausen, J.; Tro¨ ber, S. P.; Haderlein, S. B.; Schwarzenbach, R.
P. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1995, 29 (9), 2396-2404.
(26) Hofstetter, T. B.; Heijman, C. G.; Haderlein, S. B.; Holliger, C.;
Schwarzenbach, R. P. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1999, 33 (9), 1479-
1487.
(27) Zenno, S.; Kobori, T.; Tanokura, M.; Saigo, K. J. Bacteriol. 1998,
180 (2), 422-425.
(28) Meisel, D.; Neta, P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1975, 97, 5198-5203.
(29) Wardman, P.; Clarke, E. D. J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans. 1. 1976,
72, 1377-1390.
(30) Whitham, K.; Lyons, S.; Miller, R.; Nett, D.; Treas, P.; Zante, A.;
Fessenden, R. W.; Thomas, M. D.; Wang, Y. Presented at Particle
Accelerator Conference and International Conference on High
Energy Accelerators, Dallas, TX, 1995.
(31) Hug, G. L.; Wang, Y.; Scho¨ neich, C.; Jiang, P.-Y.; Fessenden, R.
W. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 1999, 54, 559-566.
(32) Stumm, W.; Morgan, J. J. Aquatic Chemistry: Chemical Equilibria
and Rates in Natural Water; John Wiley & Sons: New York, 1996.
(33) Skoog, D.; West, D. M.; Holler, F. J. Fundamentals of Analytical
Chemistry, 7th ed.; Suanders College Publishing: New York,
1996.
We report E1°′ values measured by pulse radiolysis for six
important soil and groundwater pollutants: TNT, 24DNT,
26DNT, 2ADNT, 4ADNT, and DANT. Previous research has
shown that insight into transformation mechanisms and
kinetics can be gained from these values (21). We have
corroborated that the nitroreduction rate of these nitroarenes
by NAD(P)H:FMN oxidoreductase is strongly correlated with
the compounds’ E1°′ values. Finally, we contend that the
availability of these values will drive further mechanistic
studies into the biotic and abiotic degradation of TNT and
related nitroarenes.
9
VOL. 34, NO. 18, 2000 / ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY 3 9 0 5