A. Nowacki et al. / Carbohydrate Research 337 (2002) 265–272
271
ln/ct−cꢃ/= −kt+ln/c0−cꢃ/
(1)
(Sweden) for analytical runs and an Ultrasphere ODS
column (5 mm packing material, 10×250 mm) from
Beckman (USA) for semipreparative runs. Constant
flowrates were 1 and 4.5 mL/min, respectively. The
products were detected at u=226 nm. The 8:17
MeCN–water solvent system for analytical separations
and another MeCN–water system (linear gradient from
18.4 to 32% run over 90 min) for semipreparative
separations were used. A small portion of the sample A
or B was injected into a Vega 6180 (Carlo Erba)
capillary gas chromatograph equipped with a cold ‘on
column’ injector and a flame ionization detector (FID).
Gas flowrates for FID were 50 and 90 mL/min for
hydrogen and air, respectively. Hydrogen (2 mL/min)
was used as the carrier gas. Separation of the mixture
was achieved with a DB-23 fused-silica capillary
column (60 m×0.258 mm i.d., 0.15 mm film thickness)
from J&W Scientific (Folsom, CA, USA) using a tem-
perature program from 140 to 160 °C at 4 °C/min, 160
to 200 °C at 6 °C/min, 200 to 240 °C at 8 °C/min (held
for 10 min). The FID system was held at 260 °C. All
where t is the reaction time in min, c0 is the starting
concentration of the solution, ct is the concentration
after t minutes, and cꢃ is the isomer concentration at
equilibrium. With complex reactions, the rate of the
slow stage(s) was calculated from Eq. (1), whereas that
of the fast reaction from Eq. (2)
1
k= ln
t
c0−c0(s)
c1−c1(s)
(2)
where c0 is the initial concentration, c1 is the concentra-
tion measured after 1 min, c0(s) and c1(s) are, respec-
tively, appropriate quantities calculated from Eq. (1)
back to t=0 and t=1 min of the slow stage of the
reaction.6–8 All rate constants were determined at the
fixed HCl concentration (0.143 M). The precision of
calculation of the rate constants from Eq. (1) was
determined by standard deviations calculated from the
following expression:
(S x)2
1
500 MHz H NMR spectra were recorded in CDCl3
D
S x2−
with Me4Si as an internal standard using a Varian
Unity Plus 500 spectrometer. Optical rotations were
measured with a JASCO J-20 spectropolarimeter.
Kinetics studies—Sol6ent purification.—Methanol
was first dried over Na2SO4 and then with magnesium
methoxide and distilled.14
Catalyst.—A methanolic solution of hydrogen chlo-
ride was prepared by bubbling dry hydrogen chloride
through purified MeOH. The concentration of the
stock solution was determined by titration.
Sample preparation.—Four starting solutions were
prepared by dissolution of compound ap or bp or a f or
b f (8 mg) in 4 mL of purified MeOH. Four sets of
ampoules with the same amounts of starting isomer (ap
or bp or a f or b f) were prepared by taking 50 mL of the
starting solution. Then the solvent was removed under
a N2 stream. To each ampoule containing 0.1 mg of
appropriate isomer, 200 mL of 0.143 M methanolic
solution of hydrogen chloride was added, and the vial
was tightly closed. Two sets of ampoules containing
pyranosides (ap and bp) were held at 4090.1 °C, and
two other sets containing furanosides (a f and b f) were
held at 2690.1 °C. The reaction, after appropriate
time, was quenched by adding one drop of 25% aq
ammonia (the solution was alkaline). Next, solvents
were removed under a N2 stream at rt. The dry residue
was exhaustively O-acetylated with 1:1 pyridine–Ac2O
at rt for 24 h. Then solvents were removed under a
nitrogen stream, and the dry residue was dissolved in
100 mL of CHCl3 and analyzed with CGC.
n
|n=
n−1
Syntheses.—The anomeric mixture of methyl 3,4,6-
tri-O-acetyl-2-deoxy-
D
-arabino-hexosides (sample A)
was obtained under the procedure of Hughes et al.2
(heating at 45 ° C during 1 h) from 1 g (6 mmol) of
2-deoxy-D-arabino-hexose. The resulting oil (1.3 g) was
exhaustively O-acetylated with 1:1 Ac2O–pyridine at
ambient temperature during 24 h. Then the volatile
components were removed under reduced pressure.
CGC analysis revealed two main components. The
crude product (1.59 g) was decolorized by passing its
solution in 9:1 CCl4–acetone through a short column
with Kieselgel MN 60, vB0.08. A sample of the solu-
tion, after concentration to a dense syrup under re-
duced pressure, was separated by semipreparative
HPLC.
Methyl tri-O-acetyl-2-deoxy-h-D-arabino-hexopyran-
1
oside 3.—741 mg, [h]2D2 +118.8° (c 0.8, MeOH); H
NMR (CDCl3) l 4.87 (dd, 1 H, J1,2 1.4, J1,2a 3.4 Hz,
H-1); 2.26 (m, 1 H, J2,2a 13.1, J2,3 5.4 Hz, H-2); 1.84 (m,
1 H, J2a,3 11.5 Hz, H-2a); 5.31 (m, 1 H, J3,4 9.7 Hz,
H-3); 5.02 (t, 1 H, J4,5 9.7 Hz, H-4); 3.96 (m, 1 H, J5,6
4.5, J5,6% 2.4 Hz, H-5); 4.33 and 4.09 (dd, 2 H, J6,6% 12.2
Hz, H-6 and H-6%); 3.37 (s, 3 H, OCH3); 2.04–2.12 (3s,
each 3 H, OAc); 13C NMR: l 98.00 (C-1), 34.86 (C-2),
69.01 (C-3), 67.65 (C-4), 69.20 (C-5), 62.33 (C-6), 54.87
(OCH3), 20.95–20.72 (OAc), 170.74–169.88 (CꢀO).
Methyl
tri-O-acetyl-2-deoxy-i-D-arabino-hexopy-
1
ranoside 4.—163 mg, [h]2D0 −27.8° (c 0.5, EtOH); H
NMR (CDCl3) l 4.50 (dd, 1 H, J1,2 2.0, J1,2a 9.8 Hz,
H-1); 2.32 (m, 1 H, J2,2a 12.7, J2,3 4.9 Hz, H-2); 1.75 (m,
1 H, J2a,3 11.2 Hz, H-2a); 5.04 (m, 1 H, J3,4 9.5 Hz,
Calculations.—Rate constants, k, were calculated
with the least-squares method from the following
equation: