1
188
E. Diez et al.
LETTER
(
(
3) Arone, A.; Assante, M.; Nasini, G.; Ragg, E. Gazz. Chim.
Ital. 1993, 123, 71.
4) For previous synthesis of herbarumin I and II: (a) Fürstner,
A.; Radkowski, K. Chem. Commun. 2001, 671.
(
b) Fürstner, A.; Radkowski, K.; Wirtz, C.; Goddard, R.;
Lehmann, C. W.; Mynott, R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124,
7061. (c) Sabino, A. A.; Pilli, R. Tetrahedron Lett. 2002, 43,
2819.
(5) (a) Baeschlin, D. K.; Dixon, D. J.; Foster, A. C.; Ince, S. J.;
Ley, S. V.; Priepke, H. W. M.; Reynolds, D. J. Chem. Rev.
2001, 101, 53. (b) Diez, E.; Dixon, D. J.; Ley, S. V. Angew.
Chem. Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 2906. (c) Dixon, D. J.; Ley, S. V.;
Polara, A.; Sheppard, T. S. Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 3749.
(d) Dixon, D. J.; Ley, S. V.; Rodriguez, F. Org. Lett. 2001,
3, 3753. (e) Dixon, D. J.; Ley, S. V.; Rodriguez, F. Angew.
Chem. Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 4763. (f) Ley, S. V.; Michel, P.
Synlett 2001, 1793. (g) Michel, P.; Ley, S. V. Angew. Chem.
Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 3898. (h) Dixon, D. J.; Guarna, A.; Ley, S.
Scheme 4 End game. a) Acid 4, NEt , 2,4,6-trichlorobenzoyl chlo-
3
V.; Polara, A.; Rodriguez, F. Synthesis 2002, 1973.
ride, DMAP, r.t., 16 h (78%); b) catalyst 16, CH Cl , reflux, 8 h
25
2
2
(
(
(
6) Data for (R,R): [a]D –211.5 (c 0.4, CHCl ); mp 40–41 °C in
3
(
85%); b) TBAF, THF, r.t., 1.5 h (quantitative).
agreement with the following reference: Michel, P.; Ley, S.
V. Synthesis 2003, in press.
2
5
7) Data for (S,S): [a]D +208.3 (c 1.2, CHCl ); mp 41–42 °C in
3
agreement with the following reference: Michel, P.; Ley, S.
control that allows the selective formation of the thermo-
dynamically less stable (Z)-isomer.
V. Synthesis 2003, in press.
8) Minor diastereomer was not detected by H NMR.
1
Finally treatment of 17 with tetrabutylammonium fluoride
in THF afforded herbarumin II 2 in quantitative yield and
(9) (a) Othani, I.; Kusumi, T.; Kashman, K.; Kakisawa, H. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 4092. (b) Kouda, K.; Ooi, T.;
Kusumi, T. Tetrahedron. Lett. 1999, 40, 3005.
10) Inanaga, J.; Hirata, K.; Saeki, H.; Katsuki, T.; Yamaguchi,
M. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1979, 52, 1989.
11) Calculated from Macromodel’s version of MM2 forcefield,
see: Mohamadi, F.; Richards, N. G. J.; Guida, W. C.;
Liskamp, R.; Lipton, M.; Caufield, C.; Chang, G.;
Hendrickson, T.; Still, W. C. J. Comp. Chem. 1990, 11, 440.
12) (a) Nguyen, S. T.; Grubbs, R. H.; Ziller, J. W. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1993, 115, 9858. (b) Schwab, P.; France, M. B.; Ziller,
J. W.; Grubbs, R. H. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1995, 34,
1
13
identical by H NMR (600 MHz), C NMR (100 MHz)
analysis and X-ray crystallography to the natural prod-
(
(
1
5
uct.
In summary we have demonstrated the power of using
both enantiomeric butane-diacetal glycolic acid building
blocks to set up all the stereogenic centres formed in the
polyol, phytotoxic agent herbarumin II. Clearly these
methods could be readily adapted to the synthesis of the
enantiomeric series and novel analogues.
(
2039. (c) Schwab, P.; Grubbs, R. H.; Ziller, J. W. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 100.
(
13) (a) Scholl, M.; Trnka, T. M.; Morgan, J. P.; Grubbs, R. H.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40, 2247. (b) Scholl, M.; Ding, S.;
Lee, C. W.; Grubbs, R. H. Org. Lett. 1999, 1, 953.
14) Fürstner, A.; Guth, O.; Duffels, A.; Seidel, G.; Liebl, M.;
Gabor, B.; Mynott, R. Chem.–Eur. J. 2001, 7, 4811.
15) Data for herbarumin II: d (600 MHz, MeOH-d ) 5.57 (1 H,
Acknowledgment
We gratefully acknowledge financial support from the EPSRC (to
D. J. D.), the EU (Marie Curie Fellowship to E. D. and to F. R.) and
the Novartis Research Fellowship (to S.V. L.). We also thank
Professor A. Fürstner for providing a sample of catalyst 15, Dr J. E.
Davies for X-ray structure determination, Dr J. M. Goodman and
S. Oliver for assistance with molecular modelling and Dr F. Stelzer
for helpful advice and discussion.
(
(
H
4
ddd, J = 15.6 Hz, 2.0 Hz, 1.0 Hz, CH=CH), 5.51 (1 H, dddd,
J = 15.6 Hz, 9.9 Hz, 4.1 Hz, 2.0 Hz, CH=CH), 5.17 (1 H, td,
J = 9.3 Hz, 2.6 Hz, CHOCO), 4.34 (1 H, quint, J = 1.9 Hz,
CHOH), 3.85 (1 H, dd, J = 10.5 Hz, 2.9 Hz, CHOHCH2),
3.52 (1 H, dd, J = 9.6 Hz, 2.3 Hz, CHOH), 2.28 (1 H, m,
CH=CHCH H ), 2.08 (1 H, m, CH H ), 1.87 (1 H, m,
References
a
b
a
b
CH H CH H ) 1.80 (1 H, m, CHCH H ), 1.76 (1 H, m,
a
b
c
d
e
f
(
1) Rivero-Cruz, J. F.; Garcia-Aguirre, G.; Cerda-Garcia-Rojas,
C. M.; Mata, R. Tetrahedron 2000, 56, 5337.
CH H ), 1.55 (1 H, m, CH H ), 1.44 (1 H, m, CH H CH ),
c
d
e
f
g
h
3
1
.34 (1 H, m, CH H ), 0.93 (3 H, t, J = 7.4 Hz, CH ); d (100
g h 3 C
(
2) (a) Evidente, A.; Lanzetta, R.; Capasso, R.; Vurro, M.;
Bottalico, A. Phytochemistry 1993, 34, 999. (b) de Napoli,
L.; Messere, A.; Palomba, D.; Piccialli, V.; Evidente, A.;
Piccialli, G. J. Org. Chem. 2000, 65, 3432.
MHz, MeOH-d ) 177.7 (C=O), 134.5 (CH), 123.9 (CH),
4
7
3
4.5 (CH), 74.3 (CH), 74.0 (CH), 72.3 (CH), 35.6 (CH2),
5.4 (CH ), 30.1 (CH ), 19.1 (CH ), 14.8 (CH ).
2
2
2
3
Synlett 2003, No. 8, 1186–1188 ISSN 1234-567-89 © Thieme Stuttgart · New York