key feature of success in promotion of this oxidation in water is
the formation of micelles.
‡ Cmc, gcmc and pC20 values were obtained from a surface tension vs.
concentration (on a log scale) curve measured by the Wilhelmy method
(Kyowa CBVP-A3 model; platinum plate) at 20 °C.
When the concentration of 1 in water was 10 mmol dm23, the
maximum conversion was only 72% (entry 3). It is surmised
that the oxygen atom transfer from 1 to benzyle sulfide results
in the formation of the corresponding hemiacetal, which in turn
is easily decomposed into non-surface-active nonanal and
§
DTA/TG measurements were performed in a stream of nitrogen at 2 °C
21
min of programming rate (Seiko DTA/TG30 model).
Oxidation of benzyl sulfide in aqueous systems was conducted as follows:
¶
3
23
to a stirred aqueous solution of a-AHP (0.01 dm , 10 or 20 mmol dm ) in
a 0.05 dm3 sample vial equipped with a magnetic bar and a septum were
2
3
tetra(ethylene glycol). Because the cmc of 1 is 3.1 mmol dm
,
added benzyl sulfide (0.1 mmol) and metal catalyst (3 mol%). The reaction
3
most of the micelles will disappear at the final stage of the
reaction. This results in the loss of effective solubilisation of
substrate in the system. The appearance of insoluble solids in
the reaction system was actually observed after 18 h with the
mixture was stirred in dark at rt for 24 h. Then, acetonitrile (0.015 dm ) was
poured into the mixture and bromobenzene as an internal standard was
added to the solution. The resultant solution was injected directly into the
HPLC apparatus equipped with a TSKgel ODS-80Ts column (eluate:
24
3
21
water–acetonitrile = 2/3, flow rate: 8 3 10 dm min ). From the
comparison with authentic samples, formation of nonanal (in the case of a-
AHP 1) or pentanal (in the case of compound 2), and tetra(ethylene glycol)
was confirmed in the reaction mixture.
2
3
naked eye. However, when using excess 1 (20 mmol dm
)
micelles were still present after 24 h, so that the conversion of
substrate in each system was higher than in the corresponding
2
3
system containing 10 mmol dm of 1.
The precise mechanism of these micellar oxidation systems
has not yet been established, but it seems reasonable to surmise
that benzyl sulfide solubilised within the a-AHP micelles will
be oxidised effectively by hydroperoxy groups of a-AHP,
which will exist in the vicinity of the solubilised site.
In summary, effective oxidation of benzyl sufide to the
corresponding sulfoxide (and sulfone) in water has been
achieved by using micellar a-AHP 1 in the presence of a
1 C.-J. Li and T.-K. Chan, Organic Reactions in Aqueous Media, John
Wiley & Sons, New York, 1997; Organic Synthesis in Water, ed. P. A.
Grieco, Blackie Academic & Professional, London, 1998.
2
J. H. Fendler and E. J. Fendler, Catalysis in Micellar and Macro-
molecular Systems, Academic Press, London, 1975.
3
D. A. Jaeger, M. W. Clennan and J. Jamrozik, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1990,
1
12, 1171; D. A. Jaeger and J. Wang, J. Org. Chem., 1993, 58, 6745;
D. A. Jaeger, D. Su, A. Zahar, B. Piknova and S. B. Hall, J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 2000, 122, 2749.
2 2
catalytic amount of MoO (acac) under very mild conditions.
Studies on the preparation of a series of a-AHPs and their
application to other oxidation reactions in these micellar
systems are now in progress.
This work was supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific
Research on Basic Research Area (12650835) from the Ministry
of Education, Science, Culture and Sports of Japan.
4
5
S. Kobayashi, T. Wakabayashi, S. Nagayama and H. Oyamada,
Tetrahedron Lett., 1997, 38, 4559; S. Kobayashi and T. Wakabayashi,
Tetrahedron Lett., 1998, 39, 5389; S. Kobayashi, Eur. J. Org. Chem.,
1999, 3, 15; K. Manabe, Y. Mori and S. Kobayashi, Tetrahedron, 1999,
5
5, 11203; K. Manabe and S. Kobayashi, Chem. Commun., 2000, 669.
I. Grassert, E. Paetzold and G. Oehme, Tetrahedron, 1993, 49, 6605; G.
Cerichelli, L. Luchetti, G. Mancini and G. Savelli, Tetrahedron, 1995, 51,
1
0 281; Y. Zhang and W. Wu, Tetrahedron: Assymetry, 1997, 8, 2723;
M. J. Diego-Castro and H. C. Hailes, Chem. Commun., 1998, 1549; S.
Otto, J. B. F. N. Engberts and J. C. T. Kwak, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1998,
120, 9517; J. Schulz, A. Roucoux and H. Patin, Chem. Commun., 2000,
535.
Notes and references
†
Over a solution of 1-alkene (10 mmol) and tetra(ethylene glycol) (80
3
mmol) in dichloromethane (0.04 dm ) was passed a slow stream of ozone
(
1.2 equiv.) at 278 °C. Then, the mixture was poured into aqueous NaHCO
3
6 K. Sato, M. Aoki, J. Takagi, K. Zimmermann and R. Noyori, Bull. Chem.
Soc. Jpn., 1999, 72, 2287; C. W. Jones, Applications of Hydrogen
Hydroperoxide and Derivatives, RSC, Cambridge, 1999.
7 M. Hudlicky, Oxidations in Organic Chemistry, ACS Monograph 186,
Washington, D.C., 1990, p. 9; Handbook of Reagents for Organic
Synthesis, Oxidizing and Reducing Agents, ed. S. D. Burke and R. L.
Danheiser, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, 1999, pp. 61–68.
8 M. J. Rosen, Surfactants and Interfacial Phenomena, 2nd edn., John
Wiley & Sons, New York, 1989, ch. 2, 3 and 5.
9 R. A. Sheldon and J. K. Kochi, Metal-Catalyzed Oxidations of Organic
Compounds, Academic Press, New York, 1981, ch. 1, 3 and 13.
and was extracted with ether. After evaporation of the solvent, the crude
products were separated by column chromatography on silica gel. Elution
with ether–methanol (95+5, v/v) gave the target a-AHP as an oil. Selected
data for compound 1 (R = n-C
8
H
17), d
.15–1.45 (m, 12H), 1.60–1.85 (m, 2H), 3.1 (s, 1H), 3.52–3.90 (m, 16H),
.84 (t, 1H), 10.66 (s, 1H); d (67.5 MHz) 13.98, 22.53, 24.71, 29.07, 29.23,
9.32, 31.05, 31.71, 61.49, 65.12, 69.95, 70.02, 70.19, 70.42, 70.92, 72.38,
07.00 (Calc. for C17 : C, 57.93; H, 10.30. Found: C, 58.12; H,
0.09%). For compound 2 (R = n-C ), similar NMR data were recorded
: C, 52.69; H, 9.52. Found: C, 52.39; H, 9.37%).
H 3
(270 MHz; CDCl ) 0.88 (t, 3H),
1
4
2
1
1
C
36 7
H O
H
4 9
(Calc. for C13
H O
28 7
1728
Chem. Commun., 2000, 1727–1728