1
2
H), 4.22 (s, 2H), 2.29 (s, 3H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl
3
) δ 155.8, 140.4, 136.9, 121.5, 116.1, 112.2, 54.6,
+
1.3; ESI-HRMS (M+H) m/z calcd for C
8
H
10
N
3
O 164.0824, found 164.0833.
3
.4. 1-(Azidomethyl)-3-((4-(bromomethyl)benzyl)oxy)-5-methylbenzene (7)
To a solution of compound 6 (73 mg, 0.45 mol) in DMF (10 mL) was added sodium hydride (54 mg,
.34 mmol) and p-xylylene dibromide (590 mg, 2.24 mmol) at room temperature. After being stirred at room
1
temperature for 4 h, the reaction mixture was evaporated, diluted with water, and the product was extracted with
EtOAc. The extract was washed with brine, dried, and evaporated. Flash column chromatography with
1
hexane/EtOAc (20:1) as the eluent gave compound 7 (127 mg, 82%). H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl
6
1
3
) δ 7.40 (s, 4H),
) δ
59.8, 140.1, 137.4, 137.2, 136.6, 129.4, 127.9, 121.6, 115.5, 111.6, 69.6, 54.9, 33.1, 21.4; ESI-HRMS (M+H)+
O 346.0555, found 346.0569.
.75 (s, 1H), 6.72 (s, 2H), 5.03 (s, 2H), 4.49 (s, 2H), 4.25 (s, 2H), 2.32 (s, 3H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl
3
m/z calcd for C16H17BrN
3
3
.5. (R)-(1-(4-((3-(Azidomethyl)-5-methylphenoxy)methyl)benzyl)pyrrolidin-2-yl)methanol (8)
To a solution of 7 (19 mg, 0.055 mmol) in acetonitrile (3 mL) was added (R)-(-)-prolinol (17 mg, 0.16
mmol). The reaction mixture was stirred at 50 °C for 12 h and concentrated. Purification by silica gel
chromatography, eluting with CH Cl /MeOH (10:1), gave 16 mg (78%) of compound 8 as a slightly yellow waxy
) δ 7.37 (dd, J = 8.4, 12.0 Hz, 4H), 6.75 (s, 1H), 6.71 (s, 2H), 5.02 (s, 2H), 4.24
s, 2H), 4.05 (d, J = 13.1 Hz, 1H), 3.67 (dd, J = 11.2, 3.2 Hz, 1H), 3.57–3.49 (m, 2H), 3.10–3.06 (m, 1H), 2.90–
2
2
1
solid. H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl
(
2
1
3
.88 (m, 1H), 2.40 (dd, J = 17.3, 8.7 Hz, 1H), 2.31 (s, 3H), 2.01–1.61 (m, 4H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl
59.1, 140.1, 136.6, 136.3, 129.6, 127.8, 121.6, 115.5, 111.5, 69.6, 65.1, 61.7, 58.4, 54.8, 54.3, 27.5, 23.4, 21.5;
3
) δ
+
27 4 2
ESI-HRMS (M+H) m/z calcd for C21H N O 367.2134, found 367.2192.
3
.6. (R)-5-(Dimethylamino)-N-(3-((4-((2-(hydroxymethyl)pyrrolidin-1-yl)methyl)benzyl)oxy)-5-methylbenzyl)-
naphthalene-1-sulfonamide (2)
To a solution of compound 8 (37 mg, 0.10 mmol) in benzene/H
2
O (10/1, 5 mL) was added
triphenylphosphine (41 mg, 0.20 mmol). The reaction mixture was heated at 60 °C for 12 h and concentrated. To
a solution of the reaction mixture 9 (0.10 mmol) in acetonitrile (4 mL) was added triethylamine (0.5 mL) and
dansyl chloride (54 mg, 0.20 mmol). The reaction mixture was stirred at 50 °C for 12 h and concentrated.
Purification by silica gel chromatography, eluting with CH
as a slightly yellow waxy solid. H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl
8
7
2
Cl
) δ 8.52 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 1H), 8.29 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 1H),
.24 (dd, J = 7.3, 1.0 Hz, 1H), 7.56 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H), 7.49 (dd, J = 8.4, 7.4 Hz, 1H), 7.36 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 2H),
.29 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 2H), 7.16 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 6.58 (s, 1H), 6.43 (s, 2H), 5.10 (br, OH), 4.77 (s, 2H), 4.20 (d,
2
/MeOH (10:1), gave 41 mg (72%) of compound 2
1
3
J = 13.2 Hz, 1H), 4.01 (d, J = 5.3 Hz, 2H), 3.79 (d, J = 12.9 Hz, 1H), 3.75–3.60 (m, 2H), 3.27 (dd, J = 17.9, 7.1
Hz, 1H), 3.15 (dd, J = 19.8, 9.3 Hz, 1H), 2.85 (s, 6H), 2.71–2.58 (m, 1H), 2.15 (s, 3H), 2.03–1.94 (m, 1H), 1.93–
1
3
1
1
4
.75 (m, 3H); C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl
3
) δ 158.6, 152.0, 139.8, 137.7, 134.7, 130.6, 130.5, 129.9, 129.8, 129.7,
29.6 (2C), 128.5 (2C), 127.8 (2C), 123.2, 121.2, 118.8, 115.6, 115.1, 110.6, 69.3, 61.5, 60.4, 58.7, 54.4, 53.5,
7.3, 45.4, 29.7, 23.2, 21.2; ESI-HRMS (M+H) m/z calcd for C33H N O S 574.2740, found 574.2724.
40 3 4
+
3
.7. Sphingosine kinase activity assay
Sphingosine kinase 1 inhibitory effect was measured with (0.40 M PF-543 (1) and dansyl-PF-543 (2)
using 100 M sphingosine, 10 M ATP and 0.5 ng/l of recombinant sphingosine kinase 1. SK1 activity was
detected with an Echelon's Sphingosine Kinase Activity Assay kit (Echelon Biosciences Incorporated) according
to the manufacturer’s protocol. The IC50 was calculated using Sigma plot software.
3
.8. Molecular modeling of dansyl-PF-543 against SK1
Molecular modeling of dansyl-PF-543 against SK1 was performed using Induced Fit Docking (IFD)
protocol as implemented in Schrödinger Suite 2017-2 (Schrödinger, LLC, http://www.schrodinger.com). The PF-
43-bound crystal structure of SK1 obtained from the Protein Data Bank (http://www.rcsb.org/pdb) showed that
5
PDB code was 4V2414 (Wang et al., 2014). The grid box of receptor was set using the bound PF-543 and all
constraints were set to default value. The Glide SP (Standard Precision) mode docking process was used for the
identification of initial docking pose, and 20 ligand poses were generated. A van der Waals scaling of 0.7 and 0.5
were used for the protein and ligand non-polar atoms, respectively. The trim side chains were set automatically.
In addition, only the residues within 5.0 Å of the ligand were refined using Prime Refinement. The refined
complexes were ranked by Prime energy, and the receptors within 30 kcal/mol of the minimum energy structure
were selected for a Glide Redocking step. The binding pose with the lowest IFD score structure (-770.542 kcal/mol)
was selected and the docking pose was determined using Discovery Studio 2016 (http://www.biovia.com).
5