C. Policar, F. Lambert, M Cesario, I. Morgenstern-Badarau
FULL PAPER
ded dropwise. The reaction mixture was left for 30 min. at 0°C and
culated and included in the refinement at their ideal positions
˚
˚
then allowed to warm to room temperature. After 15 h, the solution (CϪHar ϭ 0.93A, CϪHMe ϭ 0.96A) with an isotropic thermal par-
was filtered and the filtrate evaporated to dryness. The residual oil ameter of 1.2 for the bonded atoms. Only the manganese atom was
was distilled under reduced pressure (0.4 Torr, 100°C), to give a refined anisotropically to limit the number of parameters versus
1
colorless liquid. Yield: 75%. Ϫ H NMR (CDCl
H, CH ), 2.81 (s, 1 H, NH), 3.48 (s, 2 H, NϪCH
s, 2 H, pyϪCH ϪN), 4.20 (q, 2 H, OϪCH ), 7.17 (t, 1 H, Hpy),
.33 (d, 1 H, Hpy), 7.64 (t, 1 H, Hpy), 8.56 (d, 1 H, Hpy).
3
the number of data.
3
2
ϪCOOEt), 3.96
The asymmetric unit consists of one monomeric complex cation
and one counteranion (PF ). The latter shows disorder; two differ-
6
ent sites were found on a difference Fourier-syntheses. A better
convergence was obtained with an occupancy factor of 50% and
(
7
2
2
Potassium
N,N-[2-pyridylmethyl)(1-methylimidazol-2-yl)-methyl]-
glycinate (2K): A solution of 1 (3.88 g) and N-methyl-2-imidazol- refinement was pursued with restraints. A selection of bond lengths
[
45]
carboxaldehyde
over (Pd/C, 10%) for 24 h. After filtration and evaporation to dry-
ness, 2K was obtained by hydrolysis at room temperature in H O/
EtOH (3:1) with K CO (2.2 equiv.) for 48 h. Residual potassium
(2.2 g) in MeOH (100 mL) was hydrogenated
and angles is presented in Table 2 and the crystallographic number
scheme is presented in Figure 1 which shows three adjacent units
along the axis b.
2
2
3
Crystallographic data (excluding structure factors) for the structure
included in this paper have been deposited with the Cambridge
Crystallographic Data Centre as supplementary publication
no. CCDC-125980. Copies of the data can be obtained free of
charge on application to CCDC, 12 Union Road, Cambridge
CB2 1EZ, UK [Fax: (internat.) ϩ 44-1223/336-033; E-mail:
deposit@ccdc.cam.ac.uk].
salts were partially removed by extracting the carboxylate 2K with
anhydrous MeOH. Compound 2K was recrystallized from MeOH/
EtOEt. Yield: 95%. Ϫ 1H NMR (CD
), 3.52 and 3.57 (2s, 2 ϫ 2 H,
ϪIm), 6.54 and 6.64 (2s, 2 ϫ 1 H, HIm),
3
NϪCH
NϪCH
2
COOK), 3.30 (s, 3 H, CH
Ϫpy and NϪCH
.03 (t, 1 H, Hpy), 7.14 (d, 1 H, Hpy), 7.52 (t, 1 H, Hpy), 8.15 (d, 1
H, Hpy). Ϫ IR (KBr): ν˜ ϭ 1591 (νasCO), 1396 (νsCO), 771
(νpyr. deform.), 742 (νimid. deform.) cm (strong bands only).
3
2
2
7
Ϫ1
n 6 n
Mn(IPG)(MeOH)] (PF )
(3): The pH of a 2 ϫ 10Ϫ3 solution
[
Acknowledgments
of 2K in water was adjusted by HCl addition in the 8Ϫ8.5 range.
After evaporation, the solid was dried under reduced pressure for
We thank Dr. E. Rivi e` re for his contribution to magnetic measure-
ments and Pr T. Mallah for useful discussions.
one night in the presence of P
tion of the ligand in anhydrous methanol. Typically, chain crystals
were obtained as followed. MnBr (330 mg) in deoxygenated
2 5
O and KCl was removed by extrac-
2
[
1]
G. B. Deacon, R. J. Phillips, Coord. Chem. Rev. 1980, 227Ϫ250.
R. L. Rardin, W. B. Tolman, S. J. Lippard, New J. Chem. 1991,
MeOH (20 mL) was added to a solution of the ligand (400 mg) in
deoxygenated MeOH (20 mL). It was allowed to stand for two
hours at 40°C. Then, after cooling, a deoxygenated solution of
[2]
1
5, 417Ϫ430.
[3]
Y. Akhriff, J. Server-Carrio, A. Sancho, J. Garcia-Lozano, E.
Escriva, J. V. Folgado, L. Soto, Inorg. Chem. 1999, 38,
NH
The solution was allowed to stand for a week during which time
crystals were formed. Yield: 50%. Ϫ C14 MnN P (491.2):
4 6
PF (3 equivalents) in MeOH (40 mL) was added dropwise.
1
174Ϫ1185.
[4]
M. C. Rodriguez, C. Policar, I. Morgenstern-Badarau, unpub-
lished results.
H
19
F
6
4 3
O
[
[
5]
6]
calcd C 34.2, H 3.9, N 11.4, P 6.3, Mn 11.2; found C 33.9, H 3.8,
M. C. Rodriguez, I. Morgenstern-Badarau, M. C e´ sario, J. Gu-
ilhem, B. Keita, L. Nadjo, Inorg. Chem. 1996,
In the IPG abbreviation, I stands for imidazole, P for pyridine
and G for glycinate.
N 11.3, P 5.9, Mn 10.6. Ϫ IR (KBr): ν˜ ϭ 1606 (sh), 1571 (νasCO),
Ϫ1
1
440 (νsCO), 770 (νpyr. deform.) 755 (νimid. deform.) cm (strong bands
only). Ϫ The EPR spectrum was recorded on ground crystals at
room temperature and 100 K. It shows a broad signal centered at
g ϭ 1.98, with no resolved hyperfine structure.
[7]
M. J. Baldwin, J. W. Kampf, M. L. Kirk, V. L. Pecoraro, Inorg.
Chem. 1995, 34, 5252Ϫ5260.
[
[
8]
9]
M. I. Kay, I. Almodovar, S. F. Kaplan, Acta Cryst. 1968, B24,
1
312Ϫ1316.
All measurements were performed with crystals or ground crystals
from the same batch of crystallization.
J. Pickworth Glusker, H. L. Carrel, J. Mol. Strut. 1973, 15,
151Ϫ159.
[10]
E. F. Bertaut, T. Q. Duc, P. Burlet, P. Burlet, M. Thomas, J. M.
Moreau, Acta Cryst. 1974, B30, 2234Ϫ2236.
[11]
Crystal Data, Data Collection and Refinement
T. Glowiak, Z. Ciunik, Acta Cryst. 1978, B34, 1980Ϫ1983.
Z. Ciunik, T. Glowiak, Acta Cryst. 1980, B36, 1212Ϫ1213.
G. Smith, E. J. OЈReilly, C. H. L. Kennard, J. Chem. Soc., Dal-
ton Trans. 1980, 2462Ϫ2466.
[
[
12]
13]
Several crystals were tested for their suitability for X-ray diffraction
studies. Most of them were twinned. A very thin fragment was
found to be a single crystal. This pale yellow-pink crystal of
[14]
Z. Ciunik, T. Glowiak, Acta Cryst. 1981, B37, 693Ϫ695.
X.-M. Chen, Y.-X. Tong, Z.-T. Xu, T. C. W. Mak, J. Chem.
Soc., Dalton Trans. 1995, 4001Ϫ4004.
[15]
0.2 ϫ 0.15 ϫ 0.07 mm was mounted on an EnrafϪNonius Cad 4
diffractometer with graphite monochromated Mo-K
α
radiation
[16]
V. Tangoulis, G. Psomas, C. Dendrinou-Samara, C. P. Rapto-
poulou, T. A., D. P. Kessissoglou, Inorg. Chem. 1996, 35,
˚
[λ ϭ 0.7107A]. The unit cell dimensions were refined from setting
angles of 25 reflections [5.2 < Θ <11.6°]. Structure determination
and refinement data are reported in Table 1. Data collection was
performed at room temperature with ΘϪ2Θ scan technique mode,
in the 2Θ range from 4 to 32°. Three standard reflections were
measured every hour, to monitor instrument and crystal stability.
A 28% decay was observed. A total of 568 reflections was collected
7
655Ϫ7660.
[
[
[
17]
18]
19]
M. E. Fisher, Ann. J. Phys. 1964, 32, 343Ϫ346.
O. Kahn, Molecular magnetism, VCH, New York, 1993.
T. Smith, S. A. Friedberg, Phys. Rev. 1968, 660Ϫ665.
R. Dingle, M. E. Lines, S. L. Holt, Phys. Rev. 1969, 187,
[20]
6
43Ϫ648.
[
[
21]
22]
C. Dupas, J.-P. Renard, Phys. Rev. B 1978, 18, 401Ϫ407.
B. E. Myers, L. Berger, S. A. Friedberg, J. Appl. Phys. 1969,
[Ϫ6 Յ h Յ 6; 0 Յ k Յ 7; 0 Յ l Յ 9]. From 531 independent
40, 1149Ϫ1151.
reflections, 509 were used [I > 2σ(I)]. These data were corrected for
Lorentz and polarization factors but not for absorption factors.
[23]
D. K. Towle, S. K. Hoffmann, W. E. Hatfield, P. Singh, P.
Chaudhuri, Inorg. Chem. 1988, 394Ϫ399.
24]
[
B. Chiari, A. Cinti, L. David, F. Ferraro, D. Gatteschi, O.
Piovesana, P. F. Zanazzi, Inorg. Chem. 1996, 7413Ϫ7418.
W. Chiang, M. D. Ho, D. Van Engen, M. E. Thompson, Inorg.
Chem. 1993, 32, 2886Ϫ2893.
The structure was solved by direct methods (program
[
46]
2
SHELXS86)
and refined on F for all reflections by least-
[25]
squares method using SHELXL-93.[ Hydrogen atoms were cal-
47]
2206
Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 1999, 2201Ϫ2207