REACTIVITY OF N-PHENYL-N-NITROSOUREA
Procedures: synthesis of N-phenyl-N-nitrosourea
Table 3. Correlation between the structure of NBP-ANU
adducts and their molar absorption coefficients, eAD
.
PhNU were prepared from the respective N-phenylurea (this urea
was obtained from Fluka). PhNU was prepared as by Werner.[22]
N-phenylurea (approx. 1 g) was dissolved in water and 10 g of
sodium nitrite was added. The mixture was cooled to below 0 8C
and ice-cold sulphuric acid (10%) was added dropwise during
continuous stirring. The nitrosourea precipitated as yellow
crystals. After vacuum filtration, the crystals collected were
repeatedly washed with cool water and then desiccated.
N-alkyl-N-nitrosourea
a (8)
eAD (MÀ1 cmÀ1
)
N-phenyl-N-nitrosourea
N-methyl-N-nitrosoureaa
N-allyl-N-nitrosoureaa
N-ethyl-N-nitrosoureaa
N-propyl-N-nitrosoureaa
N-butyl-N-nitrosoureaa
ꢂ 0
29.0
31.0
31.2
31.6
31.6
7,674 Æ 343
521 Æ 30
282 Æ 20
204 Æ 8
93 Æ 11
65 Æ 8
Acknowledgements
a Values obtained from Reference [5].
´
We thank the Spanish Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion
´
(CTQ2007-63263), as well as the Spanish Junta de Castilla y Leon
(Grant SA040 A08) for supporting the research reported in this
´
paper. R.G.B. thanks the Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion, I. F. C.
thanks the Spanish Ministerio de Asuntos Exteriores y de Co-
than that of the other nitrosoureas studied.[5] The greater the
non-planarity in the NBP-ANU adducts, disrupting the p-electron
cloud to interlink the two phenyl rings, the smaller the values of e,
as can be seen in Table 3.
´
operacion as well as Agencia Espanola de Cooperacion Inter-
nacional and J.A.M., M.T.P.P., and M. G. P. thank the Junta de
˜
´
A similar argument can be made to rationalize the fact that the
biological activity of ANUs decreases when their molecular size
increases:[3] the smaller the alkyl group of the alkyldiazonium ion,
the stronger the linkage between DNA nucleophile sites and the
electrophilic alkyldiazonium ions.
´
Castilla y Leon, for PhD grants. Thanks are also given for the
valuable comments made by the referees.
REFERENCES
[1] P. D. Lawley, in: Chemical Carcinogens, 2nd ed. (Ed.: C. E. Searle), ACS
Monograph 182, American Chemical Society, Washington DC, 1984.
325.
[2] S. J. Lu, M. C. Archer, Mol. Carcinogen. 1992, 6, 260–265.
[3] W. Lijinsky, Chemistry and Biology of N-Nitroso Compounds. Cam-
bridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1992.
[4] W. Lijinsky, R. K. Elespuru, A. W. Andrews, Mutat. Res. 1987, 178,
157–165.
CONCLUSIONS
ꢁ The mechanism of the alkylation reaction of NBP by
N-phenyl-N-nitrosourea is different from that caused by other
nitrosoureas.
ꢁ The formation of the NBP–N-phenyl-N-nitrosourea adduct
occurs about 20,000-fold slower than with N-methyl-
N-nitrosourea, one of the most effective carcinogenic nitro-
soureas.
´
[5] J. A. Manso, M. T. Perez Prior, M. P. Garc´ıa Santos, E. Calle, J. Casado,
J. Phys. Org. Chem. 2008, DOI: 10.1002/poc.1402, 21, 932–938.
[6] R. Uehara, Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1960, 33, 12–14.
[7] J. Casado, A. Castro, F. M. Lorenzo, F. Meijide, M. Mosquera, Bull. Soc.
Chim. Fr. 1985, 4, 597–601.
[8] R. Preussmann, H. Druckrey, J. Bucheler, Z. Krebsforsch. 1968, 71,
63–65.
ꢁ A correlation was found between the alkylating potential of
nitrosoureas and their tumorigenicity.
[9] W. Lijinsky, C. Winter, J. Cancer Res. Clin. Oncol. 1981, 102, 13–20.
[10] J. H. Kim, J. J. Thomas, Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 1992, 49,
879–885.
EXPERIMENTAL
[11] S. E. Shephard, W. K. Lutz, Cancer Surv. 1989, 8, 401–421.
´
´
[12] M. P. Garc´ıa Santos, S. Gonzalez Mancebo, J. Hernandez Benito, E.
Calle, J. Casado, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 2177–2182.
General remarks
´
[13] J. A. Manso, M. T. Perez Prior, M. P. Garc´ıa Santos, E. Calle, J. Casado,
Chem. Res. Toxicol. 2005, 18, 1161–1166.
[14] M. P. Garc´ıa Santos, E. Calle, J. Casado, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123,
7506–7510.
A Shimadzu UV-2401-PC spectrophotometer with a thermoelec-
tric six-cell holder temperature control system (Æ0.1 8C) was used.
The reaction temperature was kept constant (Æ0.05 8C) with a
Lauda Ecoline RE120 thermostat.
´
[15] J. A. Manso, M. T. Perez Prior, M. P. Garc´ıa Santos, E. Calle, J. Casado,
J. Solution Chem. 2008, 37, 451–457.
´
´
´
´
A Crison Micro pH 2000 pH-meter was used to perform pH
measurements (Æ0.01).
[16] R. Gomez Bombarelli, M. Gonzalez Perez, M. T. Perez Prior, J. A. Manso,
E. Calle, J. Casado, Chem. Res. Toxicol. 2008, in press, DOI: 10.1021/
tx800153j
Water was deionized with a MilliQ-Gradient (Millipore).
All kinetic runs were performed in triplicate.
´
[17] M. T. Perez Prior, J. A. Manso, M. P. Garc´ıa Santos, E. Calle, J. Casado,
J. Solution Chem. 2008, 37, 459–466.
Numerical treatment of data was performed using the
7.1.44 Data Fit software. Geometry optimization of the NBP-
alkyldiazonium adducts was carried out with the Chem3D Ultra
Molecular Modeling and Analysis software, version 9.0, and with
Gaussian 03W Client Pro 9.0. The PM3 semiempirical method was
used.
´
[18] M. T. Perez Prior, J. A. Manso, M. P. Garc´ıa Santos, E. Calle, J. Casado,
J. Agric. Food Chem. 2005, 53, 10244–10247.
´
[19] R. Pazo Llorente, M. J. Sarabia Rodr´ıguez, C. Bravo D´ıaz, E. Gonzalez
Romero, Int. J. Chem. Kinet. 1999, 31, 73–82.
[20] F. McGarrity, T. Smyth, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1980, 102, 7303–7308.
[21] W. Lijinsky, Qual. Assur. 1992, 1, 115–119.
[22] E. A. Werner, J. Chem. Soc. 1919, 115, 1093–1102.
J. Phys. Org. Chem. 2009, 22 386–389
Copyright ß 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.