Angewandte
Research Articles
Chemie
material with 3-aminopropyl-trimethoxysilane (APTMS) as
a covalent anchor for the enzymes in a water-in-oil micro-
emulsion with potassium fluoride (KF) as the catalyst,
preserving the pH-value at 7.4. During the process, the
enzymes were covalently attached to the silica network by N-
(3-dimethyl aminopropyl)-N’-ethyl carbodiimide hydrochlo-
ride (EDC) and N-hydroxysuccinimide (NHS) chemistry.
Circular dichroism (CD) spectra of enzymes in the fluoride
solution show no significant change in their secondary
structure (LDH and LOX for Figure S1), (CAT for the
previous report[13]). Conventional sol–gel chemistry relies on
acidic or alkaline catalysis, which may result in the denatura-
tion of proteins and loss of enzymatic activity in some cases.[11]
For example, when ammonia was used as a catalyst for the
condensation, no LDH enzyme activity was detected in the
resulting nanoreactor (Figure S2). Besides, with the fluoride-
catalyzed sol–gel chemistry, a higher enzyme loading effi-
ciency than conventional surface-immobilization of enzymes
was achieved (see below and ref. [14]).
As the LOX reaction produces hydrogen peroxide, a high
amount of CAT is essential to disproportionate hydrogen
peroxide into water and oxygen in the same nanoreactor and
there is a need to protect LDH from the risk of oxidative
denaturation. In the following, we adjusted the molar
equivalents of the enzymes to LDH:LOX:CAT= 3:1:15.
The hydrodynamic diameters of the silica nanoreactors were
determined by dynamic light scattering (DLS) to be between
200 and 270 nm (LDH@SiNRs: average diameter: 270 nm,
PDI = 0.404; LDH/LOX/CAT@SiNRs average diameter:
200 nm, PDI = 0.420, Figures S3 and S4). From thermogravi-
metric analysis (TGA), a high enzyme loading was estimated
by a weight loss of ca. 20% organic contents in the self-fueled
nanoreactor during the thermal degradation compared to the
empty nanoreactor (Figure S5). 29Si solid-state NMR spectra
showed the successful formation of the silica network by
condensation of TEOS (Q2, Q3, and Q4) and APTMS (T2 and
T3) with a molar ratio of 2:1 by the sol–gel process (Fig-
ure 2c). Besides, FT-IR confirms the formation of silicon
oxide by detecting two strong bands for Si-OH (780 cmÀ1) and
Si-O-Si (1040 cmÀ1) (Figure S6). Additionally, distinct amide
vibrations at 1550 cmÀ1 were detected for the loading of
enzymes. Measurements of the surface area of the nano-
reactors by Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) gas adsorption
showed a BET surface area of 31.5 m2 gÀ1 and pore volume of
0.08 cm3 gÀ1, which was sufficient for the diffusion of small
molecular substrates and products to the enzymes through the
silica matrix.[15]
Figure 3. Enzyme reactions of silica nanoreactors. a,b) Michaelis–
Menten kinetics of LDH/LOX/CAT@SiNRs (a), LDH@SiNRs (b) (LDH
activity was measured). c) Thermal stability of encapsulated LDH and
native LDH. d) Proteolytic stability of encapsulated, native, and sur-
face-immobilized LDH after incubation with Proteinase K.
product.[16] Our results show a slightly decreased velocity for
the forward reaction of native LDH (10% for 1:20 of
pyruvate:lactate), which is probably caused by the increasing
amount of lactate in the mixture. Interestingly, much stronger
effect of the product inhibition was observed for the
LDH@SiNRs (25% for a 2:1 of pyruvate:lactate ratio,
Figure S7), presumably due to the local accumulation of the
produced lactate inside the nanoreactors. In contrast, lactate
was quickly eliminated by the reaction of LOX in the LDH/
LOX/CAT@SiNRs, which we believe the main contribution
to the increased kcat value.
The activity of LOX did not differ remarkably for both
single LOX-loaded nanoreactors and LDH/LOX/CAT@-
SiNRs in terms of Km and kcat (Figures S8 and S9), because
no substrate recycling (by LDH) occurred during the
reaction.
We determined the changes of the enzymatic activity after
exposure to 60 and 708C (below melting temperature (Tm) of
the native enzyme) and 808C (above Tm) for 15 min (Fig-
ure 3c). The enzymatic assay was performed at room temper-
ature. The native LDH significantly lost its activity after
heating to 808C (above Tm) for 30 min to less than 10% of the
initial activity. In contrast, the encapsulated LDH showed
much higher stability when heated to 808C for 2 h with ca.
40% residual activity (Figure S10). Regarding such higher
stability of the encapsulated LDH, previous studies have
claimed that immobilized proteins by multipoint attachment
could increase the resistance against heat, organic solvents, or
denaturing agents, presumably due to the prevention of
structural denaturation.[17] It is consistent with our previous
results that the encapsulated glucose oxidase and beta-
glucosidase in silica nanoreactors show higher stability than
their native states.[9,14] The encapsulated LOX also showed
higher preserved activity than their native form at high
temperatures. Unlike encapsulated LDH, the native LDH
All enzyme-loaded silica nanoreactors exhibited a high
enzyme activity, which is evident in the substrate-permeabil-
ity of the silica matrix. The enzymatic activity (kcat/Km) (with
k
cat = turnover number, Km = Michaelis–Menten constant) of
LDH in the self-fueled nanoreactors (LDH/LOX/CAT@-
SiNRs) was 2.3-fold higher than that of the LDH@SiNRs for
forward reactions (pyruvate + NADH ! lactate + NAD+)
(Figure 3a,b). In particular, a two-fold higher kcat value was
observed in LDH in the LDH/LOX/CAT@SiNRs. To explore
the reason for the increased kcat value, we investigated the
product inhibition of LDH. According to the literature, the
forward reaction of LDH can be inhibited by lactate as the
7730
www.angewandte.org ꢀ 2021 The Authors. Angewandte Chemie International Edition published by Wiley-VCH GmbH
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2021, 60, 7728 –7734