1384
Chuang Yang et al.
pellet. The UV-Vis measurements were performed on concentration of dye remaining in the aqueous phase
Varian UV-Vis spectrometer. Dyes were purchased was subsequently determined by UV-Vis analyses.
from Acros Organics, China. All solvents were purified Blank experiments showed that dye extraction was less
by standard procedures. Compounds 1, 2 and 3 were than 2% in the absence of extractant. The percent
prepared according to the literature method.2 Com- extraction (E%) was calculated as: E% = 100 (A −
3
o
pound 4 was synthesized according to the procedure in A)/A where A and A are initial and final concentra-
o.
o
22
reference.
tions of the dye before and after the extraction, respec-
tively. Each experiment was repeated thrice. The dye
concentration in the receiving phase was reported as
the mean of the determination and the relative standard
2
.2 The procedure for syntheses of compound 5a
Under N atmosphere, the mixture of compound 4 (0.4 deviation from the mean was less than 5%.
2
g, 0.3 mmol) and benzaldehyde (0.2 mL, 1.9 mmol)
was stirred and refluxed in 15 mL of MeOH-CHCl3
2
.5 UV-Vis spectral studies of complexation
(3:2, v/v). TLC analysis revealed that compound 4 dis-
experiments
appeared in 6 h. After cooling, the solvent was removed
under reduced pressure. The residue was treated with
All UV-Vis experiments were performed in DMSO
solution by adding aliquots of stock solution of the
respective dyes. The stoichiometry of the complexes
was determined by the Job method of continuous vari-
ations. The association constants were calculated by
Benesi-Hilderbrand formula with linear curve fitting
10 mL of MeOH and white precipitation appeared. The
precipitate was filtrated and dried under vacuum. Com-
pound 5a was obtained as white solid in yield of 86%.
◦
1
5
(
a: M.p. 252∼254 C. H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl )δ:
3
ppm) 1.04 (s, 36H, CH ), 4.97 (s, 8H, NCH ), 5.66 (s,
3 2
8
H, OCH ), 7.42∼8.31 (m, 36H, CH and ArH), 11.85
24,25
2
procedure.
+
(
s, 4H, NH). ESI-MS m/z(%): 1684.9(M , 100). Anal.
Calcd. for C H N O S : C 62.69, H 5.50, N 16.61;
88
92 20
8 4
found C 62.61, H 5.45, N 16.56.
.3 The procedure for syntheses of compound 5b
Under N atmosphere, the mixture of compound 4 (0.4 g,
3. Results and Discussion
3.1 Synthesis and characterization
2
The synthetic route was illustrated in scheme 1. As per
22
2
our report on click reaction, thiacalix[4]arene deriva-
0
.3 mmol) and salicylaldehyde (0.2 mL, 2.0 mmol)
was stirred and refluxed in 20 mL of MeOH-CHCl3
1:1, v/v). TLC analysis revealed that compound 4 dis-
tive 3 was prepared by treating alkynylthiacalix[4]arene
2
with compound 1 in yield of 70%. Then, by reacting
(
compound 3 with hydrazine hydrate, the thiacalix[4]
arene hydrazide derivative 4 was obtained in yield of
appeared in 5 h. After cooling, the solvent was distilled
under reduced pressure and 10 mL of MeOH was added
to give white precipitation. Then the precipitate was
filtered and dried under vacuum. Compound 5b was
8
6%. Finally, by Schiff-base condensation of compound
4
with benzaldehyde or salicyic aldehyde, two novel
thiacalix[4]arene derivatives 5a and 5b containing mul-
obtained as white solid in yield of 90%. 5b: M.p. tiple aromatic groups were synthesized after simple
◦
1
2
69–272 C. H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl )δ: (ppm) 1.02 recrystallization. The yields of compounds 5a and 5b
s, 36H, CH ), 5.00 (s, 8H, NCH ), 5.65 (s, 8H, OCH ), were as high as 86% and 90%, respectively.
The structures of the new compounds 5a and 5b were
1.77 (s, 4H, NH). ESI-MS m/z(%): 1749.4(M 100). confirmed by elemental analyses, IR, ESI-MS and H
3
(
3
2
2
6
1
.89∼8.47 (m, 32H, CH and ArH), 10.06 (s, 4H, OH),
+
1
Anal. Calcd. for C H N O S : C 60.39, H 5.30, NMR spectra. Their IR spectra showed correspon-
88
92 20 12 4
N 16.01; found C 60.33, H 5.34, N 16.04.
ding adsorption peaks of Schiff-base groups (C=N) at
620 cm approximately. The corresponding molecular
peaks in their ESI-MS spectra were observed at 1684.9
−1
1
2.4 Extraction of dyes
+
+
1
(
M ) and 1747.4(MH ), respectively. In the H NMR
22
According to the reported method, 10 mL of 2.0 × spectra, one singlet for the tert-butyl groups supported
−
5
1
1
0 M aqueous solution of dye and 10 mL of 1.0 × the cone conformations of compounds 5a and 5b.
−3
0 M solution of receptor in CH Cl were vigorously
2
2
agitated in a stoppered glass tube with a mechanical
3
.2 Complexation studies for dyes
shaker for 2 min. Then the mixture was stirred magneti-
◦
cally in a thermostated water-bath at 25 C for 1 h, and As can be seen that compounds 5a and 5b possess mul-
was finally left standing for an additional 30 min. The tiple aromatic triazole rings and phenyl groups, which