J. Shi, et al.
CatalysisTodayxxx(xxxx)xxx–xxx
changing their composition (e.g., MgO and ZrO). For DMO hydro-
genation, it has been reported that the strong acidic sites can induce the
intermolecular dehydration of methanol, ethanol and diols to ether
products, whereas the strong basic sites catalyze the Guerbet reaction to
form 1,2-butanediol (1,2-BDO), which will definitely diminish the se-
lectivity to ethanol [3,6]. Therefore, choosing the interlayer compo-
nents of LDH and modulating their composition to optimize the surface
acidity and alkalinity are effective to improve the selectivity of ethanol
in DMO hydrogenation.
Herein, we use a facile co-precipitation strategy to prepare CuMgAl-
LDH catalysts confining Cu nanoparticles by using alkaline MgO and
acidic Al2O3 as the layer components. The Mg/Al molar ratios in
CuMgAl-LDH have been tuned to investigate their influence on the
morphology and texture properties, acidity and alkalinity of the lami-
nate, as well as the Cu nanoparticles dispersion. The obtained catalysts
were systematically characterized and tested for understanding the ef-
fect of the structures and surface chemical properties on the catalytic
performance of DMO hydrogenation.
micro-scope at 200 kV. The catalyst powders were well dispersed in
ethanol solution and then dropped and dried on a copper grid sup-
ported transparent carbon foil. The morphology of the prepared cata-
lysts was analyzed using a JEOLJSM-6360LV scanning electron micro-
scope (SEM) (voltage: 5.0 kV). Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy
(FT-IR) experiments were carried out on a Nicolet iS-50 spectrometer.
The samples were finely ground and dispersed in KBr. The spectra were
collected from 4000 to 500 cm−1 with a resolution of 4 cm−1
.
The H2 temperature-programmed reduction (H2-TPR) of the cata-
lysts was performed on a ChemStar TPx chemisorption analyzer. About
50 mg of catalysts were pretreated in argon atmosphere at 393 K for 1
h. Next, the reduction step was carried out under 10 vol % H2-Ar (30
mL min−1) atmosphere with the temperature increased from 323 K to
1000 K (heating rate: 5 K min−1). TCD detector was employed to de-
termine the amount of hydrogen consumption during this process.
The CO2 and NH3 temperature-programmed desorption (TPD) was
also carried out on ChemStar TPx chemisorption analyzer to quantify
the surface basic sites or acid sites over the catalysts. 100 mg of cata-
lysts were placed in a quartz U tube and reduced in 10 vol% H2-Ar (30
mL min−1) at 623 K for 4 h before the gas switched to CO2 or NH3,
which passed through the U tube for 1 h to reach adsorption saturation.
After removeing the weak adsorption by argon sweeping, the tem-
perature was increase from room temperature to 1073 K at a heating
rate of 10 K min-1 under pure helium atmosphere.
The specific surface area of the metallic copper species was quan-
tified by N2O adsorption and H2-TPR reverse titration. Typically, after
pretreated in Ar at 473 K for 2 h, 50 mg of catalysts were reduced with
the temperature increased from 323 K to 973 K (this process was de-
fined as total TPR). Then the samples were switched to 10 vol% N2O-Ar
mixture under room temperature and pulse titrated for 2 h, oxidizing
copper species to higher valence states. Finally, the reduction process
was repeated with the temperature increased to 573 K (this process was
defined as surface TPR). The dispersion (DCu), specific surface area
(SCu) and particle size of copper species (dCu) were calculated by the
following equations:
2. Experimental
2.1. Materials
Dimethyl oxalate was purchased from Aladdin (Shanghai)
Biochemical Technology Co., Ltd. Methanol, Cu(NO3)2·3H2O, Mg
(NO3)2·6H2O, Al(NO3)3·9H2O, anhydrous sodium carbonate, sodium
hydroxide, and ethanol (all analytical grade) were bought from Kelong
Chemical Co., Ltd. Hydrogen gas (99.99 %), H2-Ar (10 %), pure N2
(99.999 %) and pure He (99.999 %) were from Tianyi Gas Co., Ltd. All
the chemicals above were used as received and without any purifica-
tion.
2.2. Catalysts preparation
CuMgAl-LDH hydrotalcite catalysts were prepared by a classic co-
precipitation method. The specific preparation process is as follows: Cu
(NO3)2·3H2O, Mg(NO3)2·6H2O, and Al(NO3)3·9H2O with Cu content of
ca. 17 % were firstly dissolved in 100 mL of deionized water to obtain a
mixed solution. Na2CO3 (providing CO32− as the interlayer anions) and
NaOH were added in 300 mL of deionized water to obtain an alkali
solution as a precipitant, ensuring n(CO32−)/n(Mn+) > 0.667 and n
(OH−)/n(Mn+) of 2.2. The precipitation process was performed under
an oil bath at 343 K with stirring (1000 r min−1). The two mixed so-
lution were added dropwise into a three-necked flask to control the pH
value of the co-precipitation solution between 9.0 and 10.0. After
continuously stirred at 343 K for 24 h, the suspension was separated by
vacuum filtration and washed for several times until the pH value of the
solution decreased to ∼7. The filter cake was dried under vacuum at
353 K for 10 h and then calcined at 773 K for 4 h (heating rate: 5 K
min−1). The final obtained catalysts were denoted as CuMgAl-LDH-x,
where x represents the Mg/Al molar ratios of 1.0, 1.25, 1.5, 2.5, 3.0 and
3.5, respectively.
2 × H2 consumption (Surface TPR)
DCu (%) =
× 100%
H2 consumption (Total TPR)
(1)
(2)
(3)
DCu × Nav
SCu (m g−1Cu) =
dCu (nm) =
≈ 649 × DCu
2
0
MCu × 1.46 × c
6
1.0
≈
SCu × ρCu
DCu
Where assuming the Cu species are sphere and contains 1.46 × 1019
copper atoms per square meter.
2.4. Catalytic performance
The vapor-phase hydrogenation of DMO was tested in a fixed-bed
tubular reactor (length of 50 cm, inner diameter of 0.8 cm and external
diameter of 1.6 cm). Typically, 0.4 g of catalyst (40–60 mesh) was
placed in the middle section of the reactor. After the reduction in H2
atmosphere at 623 K for 2 h, the temperature was cooled to the reaction
temperature of 553 K and DMO (15 wt% dissolved in methanol) was
injected into the reactor. The H2/DMO molar ratio, reaction pressure
and weight hour space velocity (WHSV) were 200, 3.0 MPa and 0.5
2.3. Catalytic characterization
Textural properties were measured at 77 K by N2 adsorption-deso-
rption using a Micromeritics ASAP 2460 instrument. The specific sur-
face areas were calculated from the isotherms using Brunauer-Emmett-
Teller (BET) method, and the pore size distributions were calculated by
the Barrett-Joyner-Halenda (BJH) method. The actual Cu, Mg and Al
contents were determined by the inductively coupling plasma optical
emission spectrometry (ICP-OES). X-ray diffraction (XRD) spectra were
implemented on the Empyrean diffraction meter using Cu kα radiation
(λ = 1.5406 Å) at 40 kV and 35 mA, and the particle sizes of copper
species were calculated by the Scherrer equation. Transmission electron
microscopy (TEM) images were taken using a Tecnai-G20 electron
h
−1, respectively. The reaction products were analyzed by GC SP-
2100A equipped with the flame ionization detector (FID) and a DB-
WAX capillary column (Agilent Technologies Company, 30 m × 0.250
mm). All experimental data was averaged from three to six GC samples
to ensure the repeatability.
2