3028 J. Phys. Chem. A, Vol. 107, No. 17, 2003
Suarez et al.
q
TABLE 5: Gas-Phase ∆G 298 for Selected NR
2
-Substituted
there is no gas-phase value available for the internal rotation
Trifluoroacetamides
q
∆G 298 of N-methyltrifluororacetamide to compare because only
the strongly favored cis configuration is experimentally observed
2
7
q
at different temperatures. Nevertheless, internal rotation ∆G 298
values for N-methylacetamides are known to be relatively large
(
-
1
a value of 87.0 kJ mol for N-methylacetamide in 1,2-
dichloroethane has been reported). The dielectric constant for
1
,2-dichloroethane is known to be ∼10 comparable to 1,1,2,2-
q
tetrachloroethane’s dielectric value of 8.2. The ∆G 298 value
for TFAPYR in 1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane is 80.9 kJ mol .
Therefore, the peptide bond in proline is expected to have an
-
1
q
internal rotation ∆G 298 of similar magnitude to TFAPYR and
to primary amide bonds in peptides.
In the typical primary amide peptide bonds, steric conflicts
between adjacent R-carbon substituents destabilize the cis
configuration sufficiently that less than 1% of peptide bonds
overall have a cis preference. The energy difference between
the cis and trans isomers of the peptide bond analogue
a
Reference 11. b Reference 23.
q
1
,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane. The higher ∆G 298 value for 1,1,2,2-
tetrachloroethane is not completely unexpected because halo-
genated solvents are known to enhance the solvent polarity of
their solutions.24
-1 28
N-methylacetamide has been calculated to be ∼11 J mol .
In comparison, the energy difference between the cis and trans
Only one other study has addressed the effect of cyclic
-1
configurations in proline has been found to be only 2.1 kJ mol
substituent ring size on barriers to amide rotation. 25 In the 13
C
because of the similar steric environments for the ring R-carbon
substituents in both configurations. This small difference in
energy probably accounts for the higher percentage (∼5%) of
NMR study of N-acetylpyrrolidine, Pinto et al. measured the
G of the internal rotation around the C-N bond to be 81.2-
0.8) kJ mol in (CD3)2SO, determined at the coalescence
q
∆
(
-
1
8
proline found in the cis configuration. This combination of
temperature of 403.7 K. This barrier fits within the solvent
dielectric series because the value of ꢀ for (CD3)2SO (46.7) is
higher than the value for toluene and lower than the expected
value for neat TFAPYR (the value of µ for (CD3)2SO is 3.9 D,
compared to 5.33 D calculated for TFAPYR).
relatively high barrier to internal rotation and relatively small
energy difference between cis and trans configurations seems
to be ideal properties for proline to have in its role as a switch.
We conclude that the internal rotation around the C-N amide
bond in N-trifluoroacetylpyrrolidine is much faster in the gas
phase than in solution, following similar patterns found in other
substituted amides. The five-membered ring substituent in
TFAPYR reduces the bulkiness around the C-N amide bond,
compared to N,N-dimethyl- and N,N-diethyltrifluoroacetamide,
q
It is also noteworthy to compare the gas-phase ∆G 298 value
of N-alkyl versus this N-cyclic trifluoroacetamide. True and
LeMaster and co-workers have done extensive studies on the
gas-phase barriers to rotation for trifluoroacetamides and have
4
,26
evaluated the results in terms of substituent bulkiness.
The
q
stabilizing the ground state and increasing the ∆G 298. The
current understanding is that the ground-state structures of
trifluoroacetamides are destabilized by bulky N-substituent
groups. The destabilization is attributed to steric hindrance and
the concomitant loss of the amide group planarity.23 This trend
is seen not only in the trifluoroacetamides but also in the
acetamides and formamides.26 The cyclization of the alkyl side
chains in pyrrolidine pulls the CH2 groups away from both the
carbonyl electrons and the fluorines decreasing the bulkiness
around the amide nitrogen. Table 4 lists and Figure 5 illustrates
some of the computational molecular parameters obtained at
the MP2/6-311+G* level for the ground-state geometry of
TFAPYR.
q
magnitude of the internal rotation barrier ∆G 298 in TFAPYR
is comparable to that found in primary amide peptide bonds,
emphasizing the importance of the relatively small energy
difference between cis and trans conformations in proline’s role
as a switch in protein signaling.
Acknowledgment. The authors thank the University of
Massachusetts at Amherst (500 MHz) and Wellesley College
(300 MHz) for the use of their NMR spectrometers and in
particular Charles Dikinson and Susan Kohler for their NMR
help. We thank David Bickar for his invaluable counsel, Ken
Wiberg for his computational advice, and Carole LeMaster for
her great editorial help.
This calculation predicts ground-state planarity of the amide
moiety (τOC6NC5 ) -0.90°) and ∠ C6NC5, ∠ C6NC2, and
∠
C5NC2 angle values of 118.33°, 129.18°, and 112.33°,
References and Notes
respectively. In comparison, the same MP2/6-311+G* level
ground-state calculations for dimethyl and diethyl trifluoroac-
etamide reveal similar planarity but smaller ∠ C6NC5 and
(1) Stewart, W. E.; Siddall, T. H. I. Chem. ReV. 1970, 70, 517.
(2) Wiberg, K.; Rush, D. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 2038.
(3) Bragg, R. A.; Clayden, J.; Morris, G. A.; Pink, J. H. Chem.sEur.
∠
C6NC2 angles. Table 5 lists the values of these angles and
J. 2002, 8, 1279.
the corresponding gas-phase free energy of activation barriers
for all three compounds.
(
4) True, N. S.; Suarez, C. AdV. Mol. Struct. Res. 1995, 1, 115.
(5) Taha, A. N.; Neugebauer-Crawford, S. M.; True, N. S. J. Phys.
Chem. A 2000, 104, 7957.
The height of the free energy of activation barrier does not
determine the relative populations of the cis and trans rotational
conformers, but it definitely restricts the interconversion between
them. The role of proline peptide bonds as conformational
switches in proteins is based on their relatively large barrier to
internal rotation and their relatively small energy difference
between cis and trans conformers. We expect TFAPYR to have
(
6) Hao, B.; Gong, W.; Ferguson, T. K.; James, C. M.; Krzycki, J. A.;
Chan, M. K. Science 2002, 296, 1462.
7) Marks, D. B.; Marks, A. D.; Smith C. M. Basical Medical
Biochemistry. A Clinical Approach; Williams and Wilkins: Baltimore, MD,
996.
(
1
(8) MacArthur, M. W.; Thornton, J. M. J. Mol. Biol. 1991, 218, 397.
(9) Brazin, K.; Mallis, R. J.; Fulton, D. B.; Andreotii, A. H. Proc. Natl.
Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2002, 99, 1899.
10) Duffy, E. M.; Severance, D. L.; Jorgensen, W. L. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1992, 114, 7535.
q
an internal rotation ∆G 298 comparable to that of the standard
(
peptide analogue N-methyl trifluroacetamide. Unfortunately,