Y. Xu, et al.
JournalofPhotochemistry&PhotobiologyA:Chemistry383(2019)112026
improve the solubility of the probe. As expected, compound X could be
used as a highly selective and sensitive fluorescent probe to detect zinc
ions in ethanol-water buffer system. Furthermore, the combination of
probe X and zinc ions can serve as a sensor for PPi detection in the same
system.
Ф, F, A, and n represent the quantum yield, the integrated area
under the corrected emission spectra, the absorbance intensity at the
excitation wavelength and the refractive index of solvent, respectively.
In addition, s refers to rhodamine B as the standard, and u refers to the
target. The quantum yield (Ф) of rhodamine B dissolved in anhydrous
ethanol is 0.97.
The association constant between X and Zn2+ was calculated by the
Benesi–Hildebrand Eq. (2):
2. Experimental section
2.1. Materials and sample preparation
1
1
1
max
1
F
F0
Ka [F
F0]
Fmax F0
(2)
All reagents and solvents were commercially available AR and CP
and were used without any treatment. All metal ionic solution are
corresponding chloride or sulfate solutions, including ZnCl2, Li2SO4,
where F is the fluorescence intensity of the X-Zn2+ complex, which is in
accordance with the concentration of Zn2+ at 511 nm. F0 is the fluor-
escence intensity of free X. Fmax is the fluorescence intensity of X-Zn2+
AlCl3·6H2O,
CdCl2·2.5H2O,
CoCl2·6H2O,
FeCl3,
MgCl2·6H2O,
CrCl3·6H2O, MnCl2·4H2O, NaCl, FeSO4, KCl, CuCl2·2H2O, NiCl2·6H2O,
CaCl2 and HgCl2. All anionic solutions are corresponding sodium or
potassium solutions, including Na4P2O7, NaCl, NaF, NaBr, KI, NaNO2,
NaHCO3, Na2S, NaS2O3, Na2SO4, NaNO3, NaHSO3 and NaBF3. Stock
solutions of the ions mentioned above were prepared with a con-
centration of 0.03 M by distilled water. The stock solution of ZnCl2 was
diluted to different concentration as 1 × 10−6 M, 1 × 10-7 M, 1 × 10-8
M and was used for the titration test. Similar, the stock solution of PPi
was diluted to different concentration as 1 × 10−6 M, 1 × 10-7 M. The
probe X was dissolved in ethanol/H2O (v/v = 9 : 1) buffer solution
(10 mM tris, pH = 7.4) at room temperature with the concentration of
1 × 10-5 M.
complex in the presence of the maximum concentration of Zn2+
.
2.4. Theoretical calculations
Density functional theory (DFT) structural optimizations were per-
formed with the Gaussian 09 program. In all cases, the structures were
optimized using the B3LYP functional and the mixed basis set 6-31+G
(d). Each structure was subsequently subjected to TD-DFT calculation
using the B3LYP functional [26]. For all optimized structures, fre-
quency calculations were performed to confirm the absence of ima-
ginary frequencies. The molecular orbitals were visualized and plotted
with the GaussView 5.0 program.
2.2. Measurements
UV-vis spectra were obtained on a Shimadzu 3100 spectrometer.
Fluorescence spectral data was recorded on an Edinburgh Instruments
Ltd-FLS920 Fluorescence Spectrophotometer. Fluorescence measure-
ments were recorded using excitation at 330 nm. The slits of excitation
and emission were 10 nm and 20 nm, respectively. 1H NMR measure-
ment was performed on a Bruker AV III 400 MHz NMR spectrometer.
13C NMR spectra data was taken on a Bruker AV III 100 MHz NMR
spectrometer with tatramethysilane (TMS) as internal standard and
DMSO as solvent. Infrared spectral data was obtained on a Bruker
Vertex 70 FT-IR spectrometer using samples as KBr pellets. Thin layer
chromatography (TLC) analyses were performed to monitor all the re-
actions.
2.5. Synthesis of X
Compound
1 (ethyl imidazo[2,1-b]thiazole-6-carboxylate) and
compound 2 (imidazo[2,1-b]thiazole-6-carbohydrazide) were synthe-
sized according to reported procedure [25].
b]thiazole-6- carbohydrazide (X). 2 (90 mg, 495 mmol) and 3-ethoxy-
2-hydroxybenzaldehyde (83 mg, 500 mmol) were mixed in 15 ml
ethanol and stirred at room temperature for 12 h and a pale-yellow
precipitate appeared. The precipitate was filtered and then washed with
ethanol (1 ml × 2) to obtain the pure pale-yellow solid X. Yield: 77 mg,
46%. Ms (ESI): m/z = 331.09 [M + H]+, 353.07 [M + Na]+. FTIR
(KBr, cm−1): 3314 (N-H), 1667 (C = O), 1541 (C = N). 1H NMR
(400 MHz, DMSO) δ 12.18 (s, 1 H), 11.30 (s, 1 H), 8.70 (s, 1 H), 8.40 (s,
1 H), 8.00 (d, J =4.4 Hz, 1 H), 7.45 (d, J =4.4 Hz, 1 H), 7.01 (dd,
J = 7.8, 2.7 Hz, 2 H), 6.83 (t, J =7.9 Hz, 1 H), 4.05 (q, J =6.9 Hz, 2 H),
1.34 (t, J =6.9 Hz, 3 H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, DMSO) δ 158.46, 149.44,
149.20, 148.15, 147.52, 140.51, 122.04, 120.71, 119.41, 119.33,
117.22, 116.12, 115.81, 64.62, 15.25.
2.3. Calculation of quantum yield and association constant
Quantum yield was calculated according to the following formula
F As n 2
u
u
u
s F Au n2
(1)
s
s
Scheme 1. Synthesis routes of X. Conditions: (a) THF/ethanol, 25℃/r.f., 20 h/4 h; (b) ethanol, r.t., overnight; (c) ethanol, r.t., 12 h.
2