Low-Temperature Ozonation of Aldehydes
of the obtained stationary points. Intrinsic reaction coordinate (IRC)
29,30
calculations
were used to confirm the connectivity between
minima and associated transition states. Calculated binding energies
have been corrected for basis set superposition error using the
31
counterpoise correction method. The effect of the solvent medium
on the systems investigated was included using the conductor-like
polarizable continuum model (C-PCM) applying the dielectric
3
2,33
constant of acetone (ꢀ ) 20.7).
The decomposition of the hydrotrioxide has been investigated
both as a concerted mechanism as well as a radical decomposition.
1
The concerted mechanisms result in the formation of the O
2
( ∆
g
),
which has singlet diradical character. Due to the deficiencies of
DFT when describing multireference systems such as O ( ∆ ), we
2 g
employed spin projection to provide an accurate description of
the complexes involving O ( ∆ ). At the B3LYP level, this
technique has been shown to provide reliable energetic data for
and is able to reasonably
reproduce (∆E ) 20.9 kcal/mol) the experimental triplet-singlet
4
,5
benzaldehyde hydrotrioxide was reported. We demonstrate
in this work by theory and experiment that benzaldehyde
hydrotrioxide (2, Scheme 1) is too unstable to be detected by
NMR spectroscopy in various organic solvents at temperatures
above -80 °C and that its previous detection must have been
erroneous.
1
3
4
1
2
g
1
35-37
complexes involving O
2
( ∆
g
)
3
8
splitting of 22.5 kcal/mol.
The mechanistic possibility, already proposed before but never
tested, of the involvement of still another intermediate, a cyclic
A recent contribution by Radom et al. assessed the ability of a
variety of density functionals to reproduce the bond dissociation
energies (BDEs) against experimental and high-level ab initio (W1)
6
-8
tetraoxide 3 (tetraoxolane)
formed as a primary product in
the cycloaddition of ozone to the carbonyl group of the aldehyde,
has also been explored.
39
data. We have, therefore, investigated the decomposition reaction
mechanisms that involve the dissociation into radical pairs against
the best-performing functionals identified in their work. These
41
It is known that benzaldehydes react with ozone at -70 to
40
+
10 °C in inert solvents to form the corresponding benzoic acids
include the restricted open-shell (RO)-BMK, the RO-MPWB1K,
42,43
9
,10
as the major products.
Various amounts of peroxybenzoic
and the unrestricted (U)-M05-2X functionals;
the mean absolute
acids were also reported to be among the reaction products.
Ozone is believed to attack the aldehydes as an electrophilic
reagent (Hammett F values of -1.1 to -0.6), and the reactions
are first-order each in ozone and aldehyde. Studies of the
deviation from the W1 (experimental) data across the set of 22
reactions is 0.69 (1.00) kcal/mol, 0.43 (0.74) kcal/mol, and 1.55
(1.33) kcal/mol for the three functionals, respectively. In previous
work, the RO-B3LYP functional was also investigated for the same
39
9
deuterium isotope effect showed relatively low kH/kD values of
(
12) Giamalva, D. H.; Church, D. F.; Pryor, W. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1986,
1
.2-2.0 for these reactions when run with ozone-nitrogen
1
08, 7678.
9
mixtures.
(13) Giamalva, D. H.; Church, D. F.; Pryor, W. A. J. Org. Chem. 1988, 53,
429.
(14) Hellman, T. M.; Hamilton, G. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1974, 96, 1530.
3
Aldehyde hydrotrioxides (ROOOH) were proposed as the
4,5,9-11
initial intermediates in these reactions.
These intermedi-
(
15) Becke, A. D. Phys. ReV. A 1988, 38, 3098.
ates might be formed by either (a) a concerted 1,3-dipolar
insertion of ozone into the C-H bond of the aldehyde or (b)
the abstraction of either the H atom or the hydride ion from
R-H by ozone to first form the radical (R• •OOOH) or ionic
(16) Becke, A. D. J. Chem. Phys. 1993, 98, 5648.
(
(
(
17) Hertwig, R. H.; Koch, W. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1997, 268, 345.
18) Lee, C. T.; Yang, W. T.; Parr, R. G. Phys. ReV. B 1988, 37, 785.
19) Stephens, P. J.; Devlin, F. J.; Chabalowski, C. F.; Frisch, M. J. J. Phys.
Chem. 1994, 98, 11623.
+
-
(20) Vosko, S. H.; Wilk, L.; Nusair, M. Can. J. Phys. 1980, 58, 1200.
pair (R OOOH), with subsequent collapse to the hydrotri-
(
21) Kohn, W.; Sham, L. J. Phys. ReV. 1965, 140, 1133.
1
2-14
oxide.
(22) Parr, R. G.; Yang, W. T. Density Functional Theory of Atoms and
Molecules; Oxford University Press: New York, 1989.
(
(
(
23) Ditchfield, R.; Hehre, W. J.; Pople, J. A. J. Chem. Phys. 1971, 54, 724.
24) Hariharan, P. C.; Pople, J. A. Theor. Chim. Acta 1973, 28, 213.
25) Hehre, W. J.; Ditchfield, R.; Pople, J. A. J. Chem. Phys. 1972, 56, 2257.
Computational Methods
The mechanism for the ozonation of benzaldehyde was inves-
21,22
(26) Cerkovnik, J.; Tuttle, T.; Kraka, E.; Lendero, N.; Plesni cˇ ar, B.; Cremer,
15-20
tigated using the B3LYP
level of density functional theory
D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 4090.
(27) Plesni cˇ ar, B.; Cerkovnik, J.; Tuttle, T.; Kraka, E.; Cremer, D. J. Am.
(
6
DFT) in combination with the double-ꢀ-polarized basis set
2
3-25
Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 11260.
28) Plesni cˇ ar, B.; Tuttle, T.; Cerkovnik, J.; Koller, J.; Cremer, D. J. Am.
-31G(d,p).
Previous investigations on related ozonation
(
reactions have shown this level of theory to be sufficiently
Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 11553.
(29) Fukui, K. J. Phys. Chem. 1970, 74, 4161.
(
(
(
(33) Cossi, M.; Rega, N.; Scalmani, G.; Barone, V. J. Comput. Chem. 2003,
24, 669.
3,26-28
accurate.
All structures were optimized at this level of theory,
30) Fukui, K. Acc. Chem. Res. 1981, 14, 363.
31) Boys, S. F.; Bernardi, F. Mol. Phys. 1970, 19, 553.
32) Barone, V.; Cossi, M. J. Phys. Chem. A 1998, 102, 1995.
and second derivatives were calculated to characterize the nature
(
1) Oppenl a¨ nder, T. Photochemical Purification of Water and Air: AdVanced
Oxidation Processes (AOPs): Principles, Reaction Mechanisms, Reactor Con-
cepts; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 2003.
(34) Wittbrodt, J. M.; Schlegel, H. B. J. Chem. Phys. 1996, 105, 6574.
(35) Kova cˇ i cˇ , S.; Koller, J.; Cerkovnik, J.; Tuttle, T.; Plesni cˇ ar, B. J. Phys.
Chem. A 2008, 112, 8129.
(36) Reddy, A. R.; Bendikov, M. Chem. Commun. 2006, 1179.
(37) Xu, X.; Muller, R. P.; Goddard, W. A., III. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.
2002, 99, 3376.
(38) CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics; Lide, D. R., Ed.; CRC Press
LLC: Boca Raton, FL, 2000.
(39) Menon, A. S.; Wood, G. P. F.; Moran, D.; Radom, L. J. Phys. Chem.
A 2007, 111, 13638.
(40) Boese, A. D.; Martin, J. M. L. J. Chem. Phys. 2004, 121, 3405.
(41) Zhao, Y.; Truhlar, D. G. J. Phys. Chem. A 2004, 108, 6908.
(42) Zhao, Y.; Schultz, N. E.; Truhlar, D. G. J. Chem. Phys. 2005, 123,
161103.
(
2) Seinfeld, J. H.; Pandis, S. N. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics: From
Air Pollution to Climate Change; Wiley-Interscience: New York, 2006.
3) Tuttle, T.; Cerkovnik, J.; Plesni cˇ ar, B.; Cremer, D. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
004, 126, 16093, and references cited therein.
4) Stary, F. E.; Emge, D. E.; Murray, R. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1974, 96,
671.
(
2
5
1
(
(
5) Stary, F. E.; Emge, D. E.; Murray, R. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1976, 98,
880.
(
(
(
(
6) Klopman, G.; Joiner, C. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1975, 97, 5287.
7) Nangia, P. S.; Benson, S. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1980, 102, 3105.
8) Cremer, D. Isr. J. Chem. 1983, 23, 72.
9) Erickson, R. E.; Bakalik, D.; Richards, C.; Scanlon, M.; Huddleston, G.
J. Org. Chem. 1966, 31, 461.
(
(
10) White, H. M.; Bailey, P. S. J. Org. Chem. 1965, 30, 3037.
11) Syrov, A. A.; Tsyskovskii, V. K. Zh. Org. Khim. 1970, 6, 1392.
(43) Zhao, Y.; Schultz, N. E.; Truhlar, D. G. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2006,
2, 364.
J. Org. Chem. Vol. 74, No. 1, 2009 97