Chemistry Letters Vol.33, No.9 (2004)
Table 1. Kinetic constants of free and bound heme proteins in toluene solvent
1211
Heme Proteins
Km/mM
Vmax/mM minꢃ1 mgꢃ1
Kcat ꢀ 103/minꢃ1
ðKcat=KmÞ ꢀ 103/minꢃ1 mMꢃ1
Free Mb
Bound Mb
Free Hb
0.54
0.28
3.23
1.75
0.78
0.42
0.72
0.48
6.61
3.56
12.24
12.71
7.58
24.49
16.33
Bound Hb
9.33
mobilized Mb and Hb indicated that the catalytic activities were
lower than that of the free Mb and Hb. Although the catalytic ac-
tivity for the immobilized Mb and Hb was low, a larger amount
of products were obtained after 30 min, which indicated that it
was still an efficient method to protect enzyme from harming
by organic solvents.
In conclusion, Mb and Hb immobilized in the interlayers of
magadiite nanoparticles showed relatively lower initial or intrin-
sic activity and higher stability or durability than that of free Mb
and Hb, which demonstrated that the layered magadiite nanopar-
ticle matrix could efficiently prevent the conformational changes
of Mb and Hb in the organic solvent. The encouraging results
would be useful for and applicable to industrial processes and
other applications, especially some environmentally benign
enzymatic reactions.
free Hb
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
immobilized Hb
TBA-magadiite
free Mb
immobilized Mb
0.0
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Time,minute
Figure 1. tert-Butyl hydroperoxide activated peroxidase activ-
ity for oxidation of o-phenylenediamine to 2,3-diaminophena-
zine with the absorbance at 496 nm at different interval times
for free and immobilized Mb and Hb. ([tert-butyl hydroperox-
ide] = 10 mM, [o-phenylenediamine] = 2.5 mM, [Mb] = [Hb]
= 1 mg).
This work was financially supported by Chinese National
Science Funding (No. 20201013) and ‘‘Plan of Outstanding
Talents’’ of Chinese Academy of Science.
References
mobilized heme proteins decreased 71.1% (Mb) and 68.9%
(Hb), respectively, while the enzymatic activities for the free
heme proteins were almost totally lost under the same condi-
tions. These results suggest that there may exist facile diffusion
of the reactants through the layered support and facile access to
the active sites of the immobilized proteins in the organic media.
The higher stability of the immobilized Mb and Hb composites
demonstrates that the layered magadiite nanoparticle matrix
could efficiently prevent the conformational changes of Mb
and Hb in the organic solvent.
Comparison of the values of the kinetic constants based on
the Michaelis–Menten equation for the free and the bound Mb
and Hb is represented in Table 1. It is evident from the table that
the free Mb and Hb have larger values of Km and Vmax than that
of bound Mb and Hb, about twofold in Km and Vmax values of
bound Mb and Hb. The transformation constants (Kcat) decrease
accordingly and the catalytic specific constants (Kcat=Km) of
bound Mb and Hb are improved compared to that of free Mb
and Hb. The decrease in Vmax values was similar to that from
other methods for protein immobilization,9 indicating that the
mass transport limitations still existed in the composites. The de-
crease in Km values indicated that the affinities of immobilized
Mb and Hb to substrate were stronger than that of free heme pro-
teins, similar to the results in aqueous solvent. It suggested that
the substrate molecules had no difficulty to access the active
sites, which might result from the more open framework of the
matrix than that of the other supports. Both decreases in Km
and Vmax values might be due to the existence of product inhib-
ition. This could be due to the restricted environments imposed
by the rigid matrix. The reductions in Vmax and Kcat for the im-
1
a) A. Zaks and A. M. Klibanov, Science, 224, 1249 (1984).
b) A. Zaks and A. M. Klibanov, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.,
82, 3192 (1985).
´
2
3
4
B. C. Paez, A. R. Medina, F. C. Rubio, P. G. Moreno, and
E. M. Grima, Enzyme Microb. Technol., 33, 845 (2003).
K. Frings, M. Koch, and W. Hartmeier, Enzyme Microb.
Technol., 25, 303 (1999).
a) Y. Okahata and K. Ijiro, J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun.,
1988, 1392. b) K. Martinek, A. V. Levashov, N. L.
Klyachko, Y. L. Khmelnitski, and I. V. Berezin, Eur. J.
Biochem., 155, 453 (1986). c) H. Takahashi, B. Li, T. Sasaki,
C. Miyazaki, T. Kajino, and S. Inagaki, Chem. Mater.,
12, 3301 (2000).
J. H. Xu, J. Zhu, and Y. Hu, Biotechnology, 7, 1 (1997).
a) Y. Ding, D. J. Jones, P. Maireles-torres, and J. Roziere,
Chem. Mater., 7, 562 (1995). b) C. V. Kumar and A.
Chaudhari, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 122, 830 (2000). c) A. Corma,
V. Fornes, and F. Rey, Adv. Mater., 14, 71 (2002). d) Q. Gao,
S. L. Suib, and J. F. Rusling, Chem. Commun., 2002, 2254.
I. Hamachi, S. Noda, and T. Kunitake, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
113, 9625 (1991).
a) S. Peng and Q. Gao, Chem. J. Chin. Univ., 25, 603 (2004).
b) S. Peng, Q. Gao, Q.Wang, and J. Shi, Chem. Mater.,
16, 2675 (2004).
a) D. Shabat, F. Grynszpan, S. Saphier, A. Turniansky,
D. Avinr, and E. Keinan, Chem. Mater., 9, 2258 (1997). b)
C. Giacomini, A. Villarino, L. Franco-Fraguas, and F.
Batista-Viera, J. Mol. Catal. B: Enzym., 4, 313 (1998).
c) Z. Guo, S. Bai, and Y. Sun, Enzyme Microb. Technol.,
32, 776 (2003).
5
6
7
8
9
Published on the web (Advance View) August 21, 2004; DOI 10.1246/cl.2004.1210