Organic Process Research & Development
ARTICLE
charged with 4 (31.0 kg, 77.1 mol) dissolved in water (310 L)
were added dichloromethane (310 L) and aqueous sodium
hydroxide (81 L, 2 M, 162 mol) under stirring. The mixture
was stirred for 10 min after which the phases were allowed to
separate. The organic phase was transferred to another vessel and
the remaining aqueous phase was extracted with dichloromethane
(86 L) followed by a combination of the organic phases. The
combined organic phases were then washed with water (258 L)
and dried over magnesium sulfate (13 kg). After filtration the
solvent was distilled off under reduced pressure (20 mbar) at
45 °C. Toluene (256 L) was added under stirring. To dry the
solution and eliminate residues of dichloromethane 35 L of
toluene was distilled off under atmospheric pressure. The
mixture was cooled to 20-25 °C after which 2,2,2-trichlor-
oethyl chloroformate (21.3 kg, 100.5 mol) was added under
stirring. After at least 10 h with stirring at room temperature,
water (172 L) was added, and stirring was continued for 1 h.
Diethyl ether (327 L) was added followed by stirring for 15 min.
The organic phase was separated and washed with water (2 ꢁ
86 L). Five hundred and fifty liters of solvent were distilled off
under reduced pressure (20 mbar) with the jacket temperature
set to 60 °C. To the residue was added tetrahydrofuran (172 L),
and the mixture was stirred for 15 min. Under stirring was added
acetic acid (37 L) and water (65 L) followed by addition of zinc
dust (8.7 kg, 133 mol) in 10 portions during 1 h (CAUTION!
Exothermic, evolution of carbon dioxide; risk for foaming!). The
temperature of the reactor was kept below 50 °C during the
addition. After cooling to 20 °C the mixture was stirred for 10 h.
To eliminate residues of zinc, the mixture was transferred to
another reactor via a cartridge filter. Aqueous hydrochloric acid
(28 L, 4 M) was added to the reaction mixture under stirring.
Then 200 L of tetrahydrofuran was distilled off under reduced
pressure (20 mbar); meanwhile, the precipitation started. The
mixture was cooled to 0-5 °C and stirred at this temperature for
at least 90 min. The precipitate was isolated on a filter and
washed with water (2 ꢁ 45 L) and diethyl ether (2 ꢁ 45 L). The
wet filter cake was charged to a glass-lined reactor after which
water (172 L), dichloromethane (172 L), and aqueous sodium
hydroxide (100 L, 2 M) were added. The mixture was heated to
reflux and kept at reflux for 10 min; after cooling to 20 °C the
phases were allowed to separate. The organic phase was trans-
ferred to another reactor, and the aqueous phase was extracted
with dichloromethane (86 L). After separation, the organic
phases were combined and dried over magnesium sulfate (13 kg).
After filtration the mixture was concentrated to approximately
20 L under reduced pressure (20 mbar) at 45 °C in a reactor.
The final concentration was performed in a 50-L evaporator
under the same conditions. Rapidly, before solidification started,
the warm oil was transferred to a reactor. To the oil was added
ethanol (63 L), and the mixture was heated to reflux. After 30 min
at reflux, acetic acid (3.63 L, 75.6 mol) was added, and the
mixture was cooled to 20-25 °C during 30 min. Diethyl ether
(56 L) was added and the mixture was cooled to 0-5 °C, then
left for at least 3 h. The precipitated product was collected on
a filter and washed with cold ethanol (8.2 L) and diethyl ether
(10.8 L). Drying of the product at reduced pressure (20 mbar) at
60 °C for 10 h gave 10.9 kg (47%) of the title compound as white
crystals.
heated to reflux and kept at reflux for 30 min. After cooling to
20-25 °C the phases were separated, and the organic phase
was washed with water (77 kg). The solution was filtered
trough a 0.5 μm polish filter to another reactor. The mixture
was dried by azeotropic distillation until no more water was
separated. A solution of acetic acid (2.4 kg, 40 mol) in toluene
(10 kg) was added at 100 °C. The mixture was cooled to 20-
25 °C which initiated crystallisation; stirring was continued
overnight. Isolation was performed with centrifugation; the
filter cake was washed with ether (7 kg), followed by drying at
reduced pressure at 40 °C and 20 mbar. The dry material was
charged in a reactor together with ethanol (36 kg) and heated
to reflux. Acetic acid (0.18 kg, 3 mol) was added, after which
crystallisation was induced by cooling. At room temperature,
diethylether (32 kg) was added, and the mixture was kept at 0-
5 °C overnight. The product was isolated via filtration and
dried at 50 °C and 20 mbar to give the title compound as white
crystals in 9.0 kg (83%) yield, ee 98.9%, mp 182-183 °C
(lit.177 °C);2 [R]23 = -15.1 (c = 2.2, EtOH.); IR 2937
D
(broad), 1719, 1552, 1393 cm-1; 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ 7.76-
7.64 (m, 2H), 7.32-7.26 (m, 2H), 7.12 (s, 1H), 6.42 (d, J = 5.7
Hz, 1 H), 4.18-4.08 (m, 2H), 3.21 (dd, J1 = 17.2 Hz, J2 = 4.9
Hz, 1H), 2.43 (d, J = 17.2 Hz, 1H), 2.34-2.19 (m, 1H), 2.11
(dd, J1 = 8.1 Hz, J2 = 3.6 Hz, 1H), 1.86 (s, 3H), 1.82-1.71
(m, 1H); 13C NMR (CDCl3) δ 177.3, 143.2, 139.7, 138.2,
128.3, 127.2, 124.5, 124.1, 123.2, 121.8, 119.4, 52.7, 51.8, 35.9,
33.4, 28.5, 22.7; Anal. Calcd for C17H19NO2S: C, 67.7, H, 6.3,
N, 4.6; Found C, 67.5, H, 6.4, N, 4.6.
’ AUTHOR INFORMATION
Corresponding Author
*Telephone þ46-40-383316. Fax þ46-40-186805. E-mail:
’ ACKNOWLEDGMENT
We are grateful to Hans Uvelius, Johnny Dahl and Lars L€ofvall
for running the pilot plant and to Ola Olsson for analytical
assistance.
’ REFERENCES
(1) Lounasmaa, M.; T. Tamminen. The Alkaloids; Cordell, G. A.,
Ed.; Academic Press: New York, 1993; Vol. 44, pp 1-113.
(2) (a) Peters, D.; Brown, D. T.; Egestad, B.; Dam, E.; Jones, D. S.;
Froestrup, B.; Nielsen, E. O.; Olsen, G. M.; Redrobe, J. P. PCT Int. Appl.
WO/2006064031, 2006. (b) Peters, D.; Olsen, G. M.; Nielsen, E. O.;
Ahring, P. K.; Jorgensen, T. D. PCT Int. Appl. WO/2003004493, 2003.
(c) Peters, D.; Olesen, D. F.; Dam, E. PCT Int. Appl., WO/2006108790,
2006.
(3) Mico, J. A.; Ardid, D.; Berrocoso, E.; Eschalier, A. Trends
Pharmacol. Sci. 2006, 27, 348–354.
(4) O’Brien, P. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1998, 1439–1457.
(5) Bunn, B. J.; Cox, P. J.; Simpkins, N. S. Tetrahedron 1993, 49,
207–218.
(6) Majewski, M.; Lazny, R; Nowak, P. Tetrahedron Lett. 1995, 31,
5465–5468.
(7) Majewski, M.; Lazny, R. J. Org. Chem. 1995, 60, 5825–5830.
(8) Thavaneswaram, S.; McCamley, K.; Scammells, P. J. Nat. Prod.
Commun. 2006, 1, 885–895.
(9) von Braun, J. Chem. Ber. 1900, 33, 1438–1452.
(10) Cooley, J. H.; Evain, E. J. Synthesis 1989, 1–7 and references
cited therein.
Purification of NS9544 Acetate (1). In a reactor charged
with toluene (66 kg) was added 1 (10.88 kg, 36.12 mol) under
stirring. To the resulting solution were added water (77 kg)
and aqueous sodium hydroxide (22 kg, 2 M). The mixture was
411
dx.doi.org/10.1021/op1003117 |Org. Process Res. Dev. 2011, 15, 408–412