ChemSusChem
10.1002/cssc.201802216
COMMUNICATION
[
12,22]
VII,
which would ultimately react with in situ generated α-dioxy
for technical and human support provided by SGIker of UPV/EHU
and European funding (ERDF and ESF). Cost-CHAOS action
radical VIII to produce the coupling product.
(
CA15106) is also acknowledged. M. Agirre is kindly acknowledged
3
by her support on HPLC analysis.
In summary, we have developed
functionalization reaction of α-amino carbonyl compounds and 2-
alkyl-1,3-dioxolanes. From fundamental point of view, this
a practical dual C(sp )−H
a
Keywords: sustainable C–H functionalization • quaternary
transformation represents a robust, yet unprecedented, means for
the selective oxidation of 2-susbtituted dioxolane derivatives toward
the challenging assembly of quaternary centers. Importantly, this Cu-
catalyzed oxidative alkylation constitutes a powerful, yet sustainable,
tool for building up structural diversity within a peptide framework
and providing access to novel α-amino acids beyond those found in
naturally occurring proteins. Important features of our strategy are
the low-price of the copper catalyst, the retention of the chiral
integrity of the existing stereocenters in peptide settings, the broad
functional group tolerance, the site-seletivity toward the
functionalization of N-aryl glycine unit and the high
diastereoselectivity induced by proline-containing peptides. As a
result, we anticipate that our Cu-catalyzed oxidative alkylation could
become a versatile platform technology of tremendous importance in
drug discovery and protein engineering.
center • copper catalysis • late-stage peptide modification • CDC
[1]
a) L. Pollegioni, S. Servi, Non-natural Amino Acids: Methods and
Protocols; Springer: New York, 2012; b) A. B. Hughes, Amino Acids,
Peptides and Proteins in Organic Chemistry; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim,
2011.
[
2]
For reviews, see: a) W. Wang, M. Lorion, J. Shah, A. R. Kapdi, L.
Ackermann, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2018, 10.1002/anie.201806250; b)
X. Lu, S.-J. He, W.-M. Cheng, J. Shi, Chin. Chem. Lett. 2018, 29, 1001;
c) S. Mondal, S. Chowdhury, Adv. Synth. Catal. 2018, 360, 1884; d) L.
R. Malins, Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2018, 46, 25; e) J. N. deGruyter, L.
R. Malins, P. S. Baran, Biochemistry 2017, 56, 3863; f) G. He, B. Wang,
W. A. Nack, G. Chen, Acc. Chem. Res. 2016, 49, 635; g) A. M. Metz, M.
C. Kozlowski, J. Org. Chem. 2015, 80, 1; h) K. Fosgerau, T. Hoffmann,
Drug. Discov. Today 2015, 20, 122; i) A. F. M. Noisier, M. A. Brimble,
Chem. Rev. 2014, 114, 8775.
[
3]
For selected recent examples, see: a) W. Wang, M. M. Lorion, O.
Martinazzoli, L. Ackermann, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2018, 57, 10554;
Angew. Chem. 2018, 130, 10714; b) B. A. Vara, X. Li, S. Berritt, C: R:
Walters, E. J. Petersson, G. A. Molander, Chem. Sci. 2018, 9, 336; c) Y.
Yu, L.-K. Zhang, A. V. Buevich, G. Li, H. Tang, P. Vachal, S. L. Colletti,
Z.-C. Shi, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140, 6797; d) M. Bauer, W. Wang,
M. M. Lorion, C. Dong, L. Ackermann, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2018, 57,
203; Angew. Chem. 2018, 130, 209; e) B.-B. Zhan, Y. Li, J.-W. Xu, X.-L.
Nie, J. Fan, L. Jin, B.-F. Shi, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2018, 57, 5858;
Angew. Chem. 2018, 130, 5960; f) N. Ichiishi, J. P. Caldwell, M. Lin, W.
Zhong, X. Zhu, E. Streckfuss, H.-Y. Kim, C. A. Parish, S. W. Krska,
Chem. Sci. 2018, 9, 4168; g) T. Liu, J. X. Qiao, M. A. Poss, J.-Q. Yu,
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2017, 56, 10924; h) A. F. M. Noisier, J. García, I.
A. Ionut, F. Albericio, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2017, 56, 314; Angew.
Chem. 2017, 129, 320; i) T. J. Osberger, D. C. Rogness, J. T. Kohrt, A.
F. Stepan, M. C. White, Nature 2016, 537, 214.
Me
O
A
B
O
O
O
Cu
no reaction
FG
+
OEt
as above
FG = NHTs, NHBn,
NHAc, NMePh
2a
O
H
H
N
N
Cu
Ph
OEt
Ph
OEt
OOtBu
1
a
as above
8
, 71%
gram-scale
O
H
N
C
D
Ph
OEt
OOtBu
8
2a
Cu
3a, 56%
+
as above
O
N
Ph
OEt
3a (14%)
[4]
For selected reviews, see: a) H. Yi, G. Zhang, H. Wang, Z. Huang, J.
Wang, A. K. Singh, A. Lei, Chem. Rev. 2017, 117, 9016; b) L. Lv, Z. Li,
Top. Curr. Chem. 2016, 374, 225; c) S. A. Girard, T. Knauber, C.-J. Li,
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014, 53, 74; Angew. Chem. 2014, 126, 76.
a) M. S. San Segundo, A. Correa, Synthesis 2018, 50, 2853; b) T.
Brandhofer, O. García Mancheño, Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2018,
10.1002/ejoc.201800896.
Cu
2a
+
9
as above
Mechanism Proposal
O
tBuOH
CuI
[5]
[6]
O
O
H
H
N
CuII
R1
tBuO
H
R1
N
N
Ar
R1
V
Ar
Ar
SET
route a
route b
IV
Cu(OAc)(OOtBu)
or tBuOO
For selected reviews on the late-stage C−H functionalization, see: a) R.
R. Karimov, J. F. Hartwig, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2018, 57, 4234;
Angew. Chem. 2018, 130, 4309; b) T. Cernak, K. D. Dykstra, S.
Tyagarajan, P. Vachal, S. W. Krska, Chem. Soc. Rev. 2016, 45, 546; c)
J. Wencel-Delord, F. Glorius, Nat. Chem. 2013, 5, 369.
O
H
O
H
N
O
VI
H
N
Ar
R1
Ar
R1
N
R1
R2
Ar
O
O
R2
tBuOO
VII OOtBu
O
isolated
O
[
7]
M. D. Delost, D. T. Smith, B. J. Anderson, J. T. Njardarson, J. Med.
Chem. 2018, 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.8b00876.
VIII
O
O
[8]
For selected reviews, see: a) A. Batra, P. Singh, K. N. Singh, Eur. J.
Org. Chem. 2017, 3739; b) S.-r. Guo, P. S. Kumar, M. Yang, Adv.
Synth. Catal. 2017, 359, 2; c) M. K. Lakshman, P. K. Vuram, Chem. Sci.
tBuOH tBuO
R
2
Scheme 3. Control experiments and mechanism proposal
2
017, 8, 5845; d) S.-Y. Zhang, F.-M. Zhang, Y.-Q. Tu, Chem. Soc. Rev.
011, 40, 1937.
2
[
[
9]
a) N. W. A. Geraghty, A. Lally, Chem. Commun. 2006, 4300; b) A. B.
Shtarev, F. Tian, W. R. Dolbier Jr., B. E. Smart, J. Am. Chem. Soc.
Acknowledgements ((optional))
1999, 121, 7335; c) V. Malatesta, K. U. Ingold, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1981,
103, 609.
We are grateful to MINECO (CTQ2016-78395-P) and Basque
Government (IT1033-16) for financial support. A. C. thanks MINECO
for a Ramón y Cajal research contract (RYC-2012-09873). We thank
10] a) Y. Lan, P. Fan, X.-W. Liu, F.-F. Meng, T. Ahmad, Y.-H. Hu, T.-P. Loh,
Chem. Commun. 2017, 53, 12353; b) A. SØlvhØj, A. Ahbulrg, R.
Madsen, Chem. Eur. J. 2015, 21, 16272; c) W. Zhou, P. Qian, J. Zhao,
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.