A. Kamal et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 20 (2010) 5229–5231
5231
(b) Kamal, A.; Rajender; Reddy, D. R.; Reddy, M. K.; Balakishan, G.; Shaik, T. B.;
Chourasia, M.; Sastry, G. N. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2009, 17, 1557; (c) Kamal, A.;
Khan, M. N. A.; Srikanth, Y. V. V.; Rajesh, S. V. C. R. N. C. Chem. Biol. Drug Des.
2009, 73, 687; (d) Kamal, A.; Khan, M. N. A.; Srikanth, Y. V. V.; Reddy, K. S.;
Juvekar, A.; Sen, S.; Kurian, N.; Zingde, S. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2008, 16, 7804; (e)
Kamal, A.; Sreekanth, K.; Kumar, P. P.; Shankaraiah, N.; Balakishan, G.; Ramaiah,
M. J.; Pushpavalli, S. N. C. V. L.; Ray, P.; Bhadra, M. P. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2010, 45,
2173.
an IC50 value of 2.8 lM, where as fluorine substituent did not alter
the potency of the compounds. Incorporation of a methyl group in
1-position of indole moiety (4h and 4p) also displayed consider-
able cytotoxicity in all most all cell lines tested.
Notably, some of the compounds displayed marked potency
selectively against prostate cancer cell line and CNS cancer cell line
8. (a) Rad-Moghadam, K.; Sharifi-Kiasaraie, M.; Taheri-Amlashi, H. Tetrahedron
2010, 66, 2316; (b) Klumpp, D. A.; Yeung, K. Y.; Prakash, G. K. S.; Olah, G. A. J.
Org. Chem. 1998, 63, 4481; (c) Wang, S.; Ji, S. Tetrahedron 2006, 62, 1527; (d)
Yadav, J. S.; Reddy, B. V. S.; Gayathri, K. U.; Meraj, S.; Prasad, A. R. Synthesis
2006, 24, 4121; (e) Azizian, J.; Mohammadi, A. A.; Karimi, N.;
Mohammadizadeh, M. R.; Karimi, A. R. Catal. Commun. 2006, 7, 752; (f) Paira,
P.; Hazra, A.; Kumar, S.; Paira, R.; Sahu, K. B.; Naskar, S.; Saha, P.; Mondal, S.;
Maity, A.; Banerjee, S.; Mondal, N. B. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2009, 19, 4786.
9. (a) Bolm, C.; Legros, J.; Paiti, J. L.; Zani, L. Chem. Rev. 2004, 104, 6217; (b) Ruping,
M.; Nactshim, B. J.; Scheidt, T. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 3717; (c) Komeyma, K.;
Morimoto, T.; Takaki, K. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 2938; (d) Kischel, J.;
Jovel, I.; Mertins, K.; Zapf, A.; Beller, M. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 19; (e) Diaz, D. D.;
Miranda, P. O.; Padron, J. I.; Martin, V. S. Curr. Org. Chem. 2006, 10, 457; (f) Iovel,
I.; Kristin, M.; Kischel, J.; Zapf, A.; Mathias, B. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44,
3913; (g) Zou, T.; Pi, S.; Li, J. Org. Lett. 2009, 11, 453; (h) Yadav, J. S.; Reddy, B. V.
S.; Reddy, Y. J. S.; Praneeth, K. Synthesis 2009, 9, 1520; (i) Yadav, J. S.; Reddy, B.
V. S.; Praneeth, K. Tetrahedron Lett. 2008, 49, 199; (j) Xu, X.; Liu, J.; Liang, L.; Li,
H.; Li, Y. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2009, 351, 2599; (k) Liang, Z.; Hou, W.; Du, Y.; Zhang,
Y.; Pan, Y.; Mao, D.; Zhao, K. Org. Lett. 2009, 11, 4978; (l) Sue, D.; Kawabata, T.;
Sasamori, T.; Tokitoh, N.; Tsubaki, K. Org. Lett. 2010, 12, 256.
with IC50 value up to 1.2 and 2.8 lM, respectively. It is expected
that these compounds which resemble with indole derivatives
(1–3), could exhibit anticancer activity by acting as HDAC or CDK
inhibitors. However, further studies by structural modifications
in both isatin and indole moieties to improve the anticancer effi-
cacy is likely to provide an insight in to the mechanism of action
of diindolyl oxyindoles.
In conclusion, we have developed a simple and highly efficient
method for the conversion of 3,3-diindolyl oxyindoles from indole
and isatin using 5 mol % of FeCl3 in high yields. The advantages of
this method over previous reports include its simplicity, clean
reactions, high yields, shorter reaction times and use of inexpen-
sive catalyst. These compounds were screened for their anticancer
potency and compounds 4b, 4c, 4f and 4k have exhibited potential
anticancer potency thereby suggesting that these scaffolds could
be further developed as possible anticancer agents by the struc-
tural modification in both indole and oxyindole moieties for
improving the anticancer efficacy.
10. General: To a mixture of isatin (1 mmol) and indole (2 mmol), FeCl3 (5 mol %)
was added. The reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for the
appropriate time (Table 1). After completion of the reaction as monitored by
TLC the solvent was removed under vacuum and quenching with a saturated
solution of NaHCO3 and the products were extracted into ethyl acetate
(3 Â 30 mL). The combined organic layers were washed with water, dried over
anhydrous Na2SO4 and concentrated in vacuo. Purification by column
chromatography using hexane/ethyl acetate (9:1) furnished the
corresponding 3,3-diindolyl oxyindoles. 4d: White solid, mp 242–243 °C; 1H
NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d6): d 10.7 (br s, 2H, NH), 10.5 (br s, 1H, NH), 7.25 (d,
J = 8.3 Hz, 3H, Ar–H), 7.20 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H, Ar–H), 7.01–6.89 (m, 2H, Ar–H),
6.84 (d, J = 3.0 Hz, 2H, Ar–H), 6.73–6.64 (m, 4H, Ar–H), 3.52 (s, 6H, OCH3). 13C
NMR (75 MHz, DMSO-d6): 178.3, 152.4, 141.4, 134.6, 132.2, 127.8, 126.4, 125.2,
124.9, 121.5, 113.6, 112.1, 110.4, 109.4, 103.4, 55.1, 52.6; LRMS (ESI, m/z) 424
Acknowledgement
The author Y.V.V.S. and M.A. thanks UGC, New Delhi, for the
award of fellowships.
References and notes
m
(M+1)+; IR (KBr) ( max/cmÀ1): 3382 (NH), 1686 (C@O), 1481, 1213 (C–O), 804,
1. Schultz, R. M.; Merriman, R. L.; Toth, J. E.; Zimmermann, J. E.; Hertel, L. W.;
Andis, S. L.; Dudley, D. E.; Rutherford, P. G.; Tanzer, L. R.; Grindey, G. B. Oncol.
Res. 1993, 5, 223.
2. Zhu, G.; Conner, S. E.; Zhou, X.; Shih, C.; Li, T.; Anderson, B. D.; Brooks, H. B.;
Campbell, R. M.; Considine, E.; Dempsey, J. A.; Faul, M. M.; Ogg, C.; Patel, B.;
Schultz, R. M.; Spencer, C. D.; Teicher, B.; Watkins, S. A. J. Med. Chem. 2003, 46,
2027.
755.
4o: Pale yellow solid, mp 333–334 °C; 1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d6): d 11.8 (br
s, 2H, NH), 11.0 (br s, 1H, NH), 8.23 (s, 2H, Ar–H), 7.97 (d, J = 9.8 Hz, 2H, Ar–H),
7.58 (d, J = 8.9 Hz, 2H, Ar–H), 7.25 (s, 2H, Ar–H), 7.20–7.00 (m, 3H, Ar–H). 13C
NMR (75 MHz, DMSO-d6):178.0, 159.7, 156.6, 140.3, 137.4, 134.6, 128.5, 124.5,
117.4, 116.8, 116.1, 115.1, 112.8, 112.5, 111.1, 52.6; LRMS (ESI, m/z) 472
m
(M+1)+; IR (KBr) ( max/cmÀ1): 3324 (NH), 1677 (C@O), 1519 (NO2 asym), 1479,
3. Trapp, J.; Jochum, A.; Meier, R.; Saunders, L.; Marshall, B.; Kunick, C.; Verdin, E.
J. Med. Chem. 2006, 49, 7307.
1342 (NO2 sym).
4. Huber, K.; Schemies, J.; Uciechowska, U.; Wagner, J. M.; Rumpf, T.; Lewrick, F.;
Süss, R.; Sippl, W.; Jung, M.; Bracher, F. J. Med. Chem. 2010, 53, 1383.
5. Natarajan, A.; Guo, Y.; Harbinski, F.; Fan, Y. H.; Chen, H.; Luus, L.; Diercks, J.;
Aktas, H.; Chorev, M.; Halperin, J. A. J. Med. Chem. 2004, 47, 4979.
6. (a) Chao, W. R.; Yean, D.; Amin, K.; Green, C.; Jong, L. J. Med. Chem. 2007, 50,
3412; (b) Andreani, A.; Burnelli, S.; Granaiola, M.; Leoni, A.; Locatelli, A.; Morigi,
R.; Rambaldi, M.; Varoli, L.; Landi, L.; Prata, C.; Berridge, M. V.; Grasso, C.;
Fiebig, H. H.; Kelter, G.; Burger, A. M.; Kunkel, M. W. J. Med. Chem. 2008, 51,
4563; (c) Giannini, G.; Marzi, M.; Marzo, M. D.; Battistuzzi, G.; Pezzi, R.;
Brunetti, T. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2009, 19, 2840; (d) Shiri, M.; Zolfigol, M. A.;
Kruger, H. G.; Tanbakouchian, Z. Chem. Rev. 2010, 110, 2250; (e) Gaisina, I. N.;
Gallier, F.; Ougolkov, A. V.; Kim, K. H.; Kurome, T.; Guo, S.; Holzle, D.; Luchini, D.
N.; Blond, S. Y.; Billadeau, D. D.; Kozikowski, A. P. J. Med. Chem. 2009, 52, 1853;
(f) Queiroz, M. R. P.; Abreu, A. S.; Carvalho, M. S. D.; Ferreira, P. M. T.; Nazareth,
N.; Nascimento, M. S. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2008, 16, 5584; (g) Vine, K. L.; Matesic,
L.;Locke,J.M.;Ranson,M.;Skropeta, D. Anti-Cancer AgentsMed. Chem. 2009, 9, 397.
7. (a) Kamal, A.; Bharathi, E. V.; Ramaiah, M. J.; Dastagiri, D.; Reddy, J. S.;
Viswanath, A.; Sultana, F.; Pushpavalli, S. N. C. V. L.; Bhadra, M. P.; Srivastava, H.
K.; Sastry, G. N.; Juvekar, A.; Sen, S.; Zingde, S. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2010, 18, 526;
11. Cell proliferation assay using MTT:
This assay is a quantitative colorimetric method for determination of cell
survival and proliferation.12 The assessed parameter is the metabolic activity of
viable cells. Metabolically active cells reduce pale yellow tetrazolium salt
(MTT) to
a dark blue water-insoluble formazan, which can be directly
quantified after solubilisation with DMSO. The absorbance of the formazan
directly correlates with the number of viable cells. The cells were plated in 96-
well plates at a density of 2.0 Â 104 in 200
lL of medium per well of 96-well
plate. Cultures were incubated with different concentrations of test material
and incubated for 48 h. The medium was replaced with fresh medium
containing
diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) for 2–3 h. The supernatant was
aspirated and MTT-formazon crystals dissolved in 100 DMSO; OD
100
lg/mL
of
3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-
l
L
measured at k 540 nm (reference wavelength, k 620 nm) on ELISA reader cell
viability% was calculated by comparing the absorbance of treated versus
untreated cells.
12. (a) Slater, T. Biochem. Biophys. Acta 1963, 77, 383; (b) van de Loosdrecht, A. A. J.
Immunol. Methods 1994, 174, 311; (c) Alley, M. C. Cancer Res. 1988, 48, 589.