Evaluation Only. Created with Aspose.PDF. Copyright 2002-2021 Aspose Pty Ltd.
Paper
RSC Advances
The effect of reaction time on the direct transformation of
cellulose into HMF
The reaction time is a key parameter determining the
conversion of cellulose and the yield of HMF. The results of
the investigation into the effect of time are presented in Fig. 5.
When reactions were carried out at 120 uC in [BMIM]Cl using
MnCl2 and an acidic ionic liquid as the co-catalyst, a
maximum HMF yield of 45.62% was achieved after 2 h
followed by a sharp decrease. Obviously, the hydrolysis rate at
120 uC was higher than the rate at 100 uC, when only a 34.95%
yield of HMF was obtained after 2 h. As can be seen in Fig. 5, it
would improve the yield of HMF if a high reaction temperature
and long reaction time were used as this enhances the catalytic
activity in the hydrolysis and dehydration steps, so for future
reactions we used a temperature of 120 uC, although this is
above the boiling point of water.
Fig. 3 High throughput screening of various metal catalysts for the direct
transformation of cellulose into HMF in [BMIM]Cl. Conditions: each metal
catalyst (4 mol% to cellulose), IL-1 (9 mol% to cellulose), cellulose (150 mg),
[BMIM]Cl (3 mL), H2O (0.2 g), T = 120 uC, t = 3 h.
The effects of the (co-)catalyst and H2O on the reaction
As mentioned by Shimizu et al.,20 an acid catalyst with
stronger Brønsted acidity could result in a higher relative rate
of acid-catalyzed cellulose hydrolysis, thus the effect of the
acidic ionic liquid dosage on the hydrolysis of cellulose should
be studied. As shown in Fig. 6, the conversion of cellulose to
HMF could be promoted by using acid catalysts in a reason-
able dosage range. The amount of IL-1 used was 5 mol%, 9
mol%, 18 mol% and 54 mol%, respectively. When the dosage
of IL-1 was increased from 5 mol% to 9 mol%, the yield of
HMF increased obviously, from 15.78% to 51.98% after 1 h.
However, when the amount of IL-1was increased from 9 mol%
to 18 mol%, the yield of HMF after 1 h decreased to 48.01%,
and when the dosage of IL-1 reached 54 mol%, only 15.3% of
HMF was obtained after 1 h and the yield decreased sharply. It
also showed that time become more critical when the dosage
of IL-1 increased: (1) with increasing catalytic dosage, the
reaction rate was accelerated; a maximum HMF yield of
22.19% was achieved with 5 mol% IL-1 after 2 h, but it only
took about 1 h to reach the highest level (51.98%) with 9 mol%
IL-1, and 0.5 h (50.09%) for 54 mol%, (2) when the amount of
acidic ionic liquid was in excess (54 mol%), the yield of HMF
declined markedly to only 4.93% after 2 h. In summary, the
HMF yield decreased as the dosage of IL-1 increased (above 9
mol%), and longer reaction times lead to a decrease in HMF
yield due to an increase in the dehydration rate of the HMF
monomer.
which is the same throughout). Fig. 3 shows the results of
altering the metal catalyst by using CuCl2, CuSO4, FeCl3,
MnSO4, MnCl2 and Co(NO3)2, which each showed differing
yields of HMF from 29.34% to 43.3%, and demonstrates that
the presence of a metal salt can improve the yield of HMF
significantly compared with the reaction without a catalyst.
This is because although ILs can effectively transform
cellulose into polysaccharide, disaccharide, and hydrolyze
these into glucose, they cannot convert glucose into HMF.
However, the metal salts have an excellent ability to hydrolyze
glucose into HMF. So, when the two kinds of catalyst are used
in concert to catalyze cellulose degradation, they obtain a
higher yield of HMF. Compared with other metal salts, the
catalytic effect of MnCl2 and CuCl2 is remarkable. The yield of
HMF was increased by 27.28% and 25.16%, respectively. In our
present system, the reason for the promotional effect of the
manganese salt may be due to the Mn2+ coordination
interaction. In addition, the Mn2+ could play an important
role in promoting the rapid conversion of a-glucose to
b-glucose and the isomerization of b-glucose to fructose,
which improves the yield of HMF. In terms of conversion
pathways, the direct transformation of cellulose into HMF
involves four reactions: (I) the hydrolysis of polymeric
microcrystalline cellulose into glucose (the saccharification
process), (II) the rapid conversion of a-glucose to b-glucose,
(III) the isomerization from the aldose-type sugar (opening the
ring of b-glucose) to the 1,2-enediol intermediate which can
finally convert into fructose via a ring closure, that is, allowing
five-membered ring formation, and (IV) the dehydration of
fructose to generate the final product, HMF (Scheme 1). In this
way, we propose a mechanism in which MnCl2 in IL-1 forms
complexes of [MnCl2(HSO4)n]n2 and we suggest that these play
a role in proton transfer, and facilitating the mutarotation of
a-glucose (Fig. 4(a)). The proposed mechanism of the MnCl2
and IL-1 promoted conversion of b-glucose into HMF and
other products is shown in Fig. 4(b).
Shimizu et al.20 found that in the conversion of fructose to
HMF under acidic conditions, the complete removal of water
decreased the HMF yield while mild evacuation could improve
the HMF yield. Considering that water dosage may affect the
conversion of cellulose to HMF, in this study several special
experiments were designed in order to investigate the
influence of water on the conversion of cellulose to HMF.
The experiment was carried out at 120 uC for 1 h and 2 h. As
shown in Fig. 7, the reaction time had a relatively minor
influence on the yield of HMF, except when the dosage of H2O
was 0.1 g. In our study, the optimal dosage of H2O was found
to be 0.1 g, when we obtained the maximum yield of HMF of
59.89% after 1 h. When the dosage of H2O was 0.3 g, the yield
of HMF was only 14.41% after 1 h and 15.13% after 2 h. The
7784 | RSC Adv., 2013, 3, 7782–7790
This journal is ß The Royal Society of Chemistry 2013