1276
GIMÉNEZ et al.
antibonding orbital of the peroxide oxygen, followed
by cleavage to the O–O bond.
equation, and the errors were determined by the least-
squares procedure [12, 13].
At present, research is in progress to determine
whether the complexation involves one or both oxygen
atoms of 3,3,6,6-tetramethyl-1,2,4,5-tetraoxane. Our
further study will be aimed at analyzing the effect of
larger concentrations of copper(I) salts on the
decomposition of 3,3,6,6-tetramethyl-1,2,4,5-tetra-
oxane in methanol solution.
REFERENCES
1. Free Radicals in Biology, Pryor, W.A., Ed., New York:
Academic, 1976–1984, vols. 1–6.
2. Wen-MinWu, Zhu-Jun Yao, Yu-Lin Wu, Kun Jiang,
Yan-Fang Wang, Hai-Bao Chen, Feng Shan, and Ying Li,
Chem. Commun., 1996, vol. 18, p. 2213.
3. Bartlett, P.D., Baumstark, A.L., and Landis, M.E., J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 1974, vol. 96, p. 5557.
EXPERIMENTAL
4. Wilson, T., Landis, M., Baumstark, A., and Bartlett, P.D.,
3,3,6,6-Tetramethyl-1,2,4,5-tetraoxane was prepared
according to the procedure described in [9], and its
purity was checked by GLC. Methanol was
commercial reagent (Merck) of analytical grade; it was
purified by standard techniques [11].
J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1973, vol. 95, p. 4765.
5. Moryganov, B.N., Kalinin, A.I., and Mikhotova, L.N.,
Zh. Obshch. Khim., 1962, vol. 32, p. 3414.
6. Jorge, N.L., Romero, J.M., Leiva, L.C., Castellanos, M.G.,
Cafferata, L.F.R., and Gómez Vara, M.E., Afinidad,
2003, vol. 60 (506), p. 291.
Pyrex glass tubes (70 mm×4 mm o.d.) filled with
2 ml of a solution of 3,3,6,6-tetramethyl-1,2,4,5-tetra-
oxane in methanol containing cuprous chloride were
thoroughly degassed under vacuum line at –196°C and
then sealed with a flame torch. The ampoules were
immersed into a thermostated silicone oil bath ( 0.1°C)
and withdrawn after definite time, the reaction being
stopped by cooling to 0°C. The concentrations of
unreacted 3,3,6,6-tetramethyl-1,2,4,5-tetraoxane and
its decomposition products in the reaction mixture
were determined by quantitative UV-visible analysis
using a CampSpec M330 spectrophotometer. The
absorbance was measured at λ 209 nm.
7. Leiva, L.C., Castellanos, M.G., Jorge, N.L., Cafferata, L.F.,
and Gómez Vara, M.E., Rev. Soc. Quím. México, 2002,
vol. 46, no. 1, p. 1.
8. Schaleger, L.L. and Long, F.A., Adv. Phys. Org. Chem.,
1963, vol. 1, p. 1.
9. Huyberechts, S., Halleux, A., and Kruys, P., Bull. Soc.
Chim. Belg., 1955, vol. 64, p. 203.
10. Leiva, L.C., Castellanos, M.G., Jorge, N.L., Caffera-
ta, L.F.R., and Gómez Vara, M.E., Rev. Soc. Quím.
México, 1998, vol. 42, no. 5, p. 223.
11. Organic Solvents. Physical Properties and Methods of
Purification, Riddick, J.A. and Bunger, W.B., Eds.,
New York: Wiley, 1970, 3rd ed.
The corresponding first-order rate constant values
were calculated from the slope of the plot of lnA
(where A is the absorbance, Fig. 1) versus reaction
time. In all cases, the progress of the reaction was
followed for at least one half-conversion period. The
activation parameters were calculated using the Eyring
12. Scholz, B., Butzert, H., Neumeister, J., and Nierlich, F.,
Ulmann’s Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry,
Weinheim: Wiley, 1985, vol. A16.
13. Machado, C. and Machado, V.G., J. Chem. Educ., 2001,
vol. 78, no. 5, p. 649.
RUSSIAN JOURNAL OF GENERAL CHEMISTRY Vol. 78 No. 6 2008